首页
登录
职称英语
According to a much-reported survey carried out in 2002, Britain then had 4
According to a much-reported survey carried out in 2002, Britain then had 4
游客
2024-05-30
52
管理
问题
According to a much-reported survey carried out in 2002, Britain then had 4.3 million closed-circuit television cameras (CCTV)--one for every 14 people in the country. That figure has since been questioned, but few doubt that Britons are closely observed when they walk in the streets. It is supposed to prevent and detect crime. Even the government’s statistics, though, suggest that the cameras have done little to reduce the worst sort of criminal activity, violence.
That may, however, be about to change, and in an unexpected way. It is not that the cameras and their operators will become any more effective. Rather, they have accidentally gathered a huge body of data on how people behave, and particularly on how they behave in situations where violence is in the air. This means that hypotheses(臆测) about violent behavior which could not be tested experimentally for practical or ethical reasons, can now be examined in a scientific way. And it is that which may help violence to be controlled.
One researcher who is interested in this approach is Mark Levine, a social psychologist at Lancaster University in Britain who studies crowds. Crowds have a bad press. They have been blamed for anti-social behavior through mechanisms that include peer pressure and the diffusion (扩散)of responsibility--the idea that "someone else will do something, so I don’t have to". But Dr. Levine thinks that crowds can also diffuse potentially violent situations and that crime would be much higher if it were not for crowds. As he told a seminar called "Understanding Violence", which was organized in Switzerland earlier this month, he has been using CCTV data to examine the bystander effect, a so-called phenomenon whereby people who would help a stranger in distress if they were alone, fail to do so in the presence of others. His conclusion is that it isn’t so. In fact, he thinks, having a crowd around often makes things better. [br] What conclusion does Dr. Levine get after examining CCTV data?
选项
答案
Crowds around often makes things better.
解析
文章第三段提到,一般来说人在人群中责任心会变淡,产生旁观者效应。但是由定位句可知,Dr.Levine的结论和这些看法不同,他认为人群会产生较好的效果,因此他的结论是Crowds around often makes things better。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3612019.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]AccordingtoanewstudydoneattheMedicalschooloftheUn
[originaltext]W:Hi,Jack,IheardthatyouwerestudyinglawinBritain.Cany
[originaltext]W:Hi,Jack,IheardthatyouwerestudyinglawinBritain.Cany
[originaltext]W:Hi,Jack,IheardthatyouwerestudyinglawinBritain.Cany
Accordingtoourrecords,___________________(之所以会出现这样的问题,只不过是因为你没有按照手册中的说明操作).
[originaltext]W:Sam,couldyoureviewtheresultsofthesurveyonleisurespo
[originaltext]W:Sam,couldyoureviewtheresultsofthesurveyonleisurespo
[originaltext]W:Sam,couldyoureviewtheresultsofthesurveyonleisurespo
ThemostsparselypopulatedcountyinWalesiswhereyouwillfindBritain’
ThemostsparselypopulatedcountyinWalesiswhereyouwillfindBritain’
随机试题
MyViewonIndependentRecruitingofUniversities1.近年来,一些高校开始自主招生2.有人表示赞成,也有人反
Justinwasalwaysprepared.Hismottowas"Neverthrowanythingout,you
OnenotedeconomisthasmadeacomparisonoftheFederalReserveandanautomobi
Hungryprehistorichunters,notclimatechange,droveelephantstoextinctio
设f(x)是区间[0,+∞)上具有连续导数的单调增加函数,且f(0)=1。对任意
工程建设国家标准由()组织编制并批准。A.国务院 B.国务院住房和城乡建设委
“人得自由,而必以他人之自由为界。”这告诫我们在政治参与中必须坚持()。A.
从“抢盐风波”到“各地发生地震”,网络造谣滋生的“网络炸弹”,影响甚远。虽然很多
案例二: 一般资料:求助者,男性,37岁,机关公务员。案例介绍:一个多月前
2021年2月,某增值税一般纳税人将2020年4月购入的一台已抵扣过进项税额的生
最新回复
(
0
)