首页
登录
职称英语
Who Lives? Who Dies? Who Decides?A)Some have called it a Ri
Who Lives? Who Dies? Who Decides?A)Some have called it a Ri
游客
2024-01-24
47
管理
问题
Who Lives? Who Dies? Who Decides?
A)Some have called it a Right to Die case. Others have labeled it a Right to Live case. One group of advocates has called for "death with dignity." Others have responded accusingly, "euthanasia".
B)At the center of the latest controversy about life and death, medicine and law, is a seventy-eight-year-old Massachusetts man whose existence hangs on a court order.
C)On one point, everyone agrees: Earle Spring is not the man he used to be. Once a strapping outdoorsman, he is now called senile by many, and mentally incompetent by the courts. He is, at worst, a member of living dead; at best, a shriveled version of his former self.
D)For more than two years, since his physical and then mental health began to deteriorate , Earle Spring has been kept alive by spending five hours on a kidney dialysis machine three times a week. Since January 1979, his family has pleaded to have him removed from the life-support system.
E)They believe deeply that he Earle Spring who was would not want to live as the Earle Spring who is. They believe they are advocates for the right to die in peace.
F)In the beginning, the court agrees. Possibly for the first time, they reeled last month in favor of withdrawing medical care from an elderly patient whose mind had deteriorated. The dialysis was stopped.
G)But then, in a sudden intervention, an outside nurse and doctor visited Earle Spring and testified that he was alert enough to "make a weak expression of his desire to live." And so the treatments were resumed.
H)Now, while the courts are waiting for new and more thorough evidence about Spring’ s mental state, the controversy rages about legal procedures; no judge ever visited Spring, no psychiatrist ever testified. And even more important, we are again forced to determine one person’ s right to die or to live.
I)This case makes the Karen Ann Quinlan story seem simple in comparison. Quinlan today hangs onto her "life" long after her "plug was pulled." But when the New Jersey court heard that case, Quinlan had no will. She had suffered brain death by any definition.
J)The Spring story is different. He is neither competent nor comatose. He lives in a gray area of consciousness. So the questions also range over the gray area of our consciences.
K)What should the relationship be between mental and physical treatment? Should we treat the incompetent as aggressively as the competent? Should we order heart surgery for one senile citizen? Should we take another off a kidney machine? Who is to decide?
L)Until recently, we didn’t have the technology to keep Earle Spring alive. Until recently, the-life-and-death decisions about the senile elderly or the retarded or the institutionalized were made privately between families and medical people. Now, increasingly, in States like Massachusetts, they are made publicly and legally.
M)Clearly there are no absolutes in this case. No right to die. No right to live. We have to take into account many social as well as medical factors. How much of the resources of a society or a family should be allotted to a member who no longer recognizes it? How many sacrifices should the healthy and vital make for the terminally or permanently ill and disabled?
N)In England, where kidney dialysis machines are scarce, Earle Spring would never have remained on one. In America, one Earle Spring can decimate the energy and income of an entire family.
O)But the Spring case is a crucial, scary one that could affect all those living under that dubious sentence "incompetent" or that shaky diagnosis "senile". So it seems to me that if there is any mental activity at all, then disconnecting him from life would be a dangerous precedent, far more dangerous than letting him continue.
P)The court ruled originally in favor of taking Spring off the machine. It ruled that this is what Earle Spring would have wanted. I have no doubt that his family believes it. I have no doubt of their affection or their pain.
Q)But I remember, too, what my grandfather used to say: No one wants to live to be one hundred until you ask the man who is ninety-nine. Well, no one, including Earle Spring, wants to live to be senile. But once senile, he may well want to live. We simply have to give him the benefit of the doubt. Any doubt. [br] The dispute over life or death began because of the incident happened to an old Massachusetts man.
选项
答案
B
解析
题干:关于生死权问题争论的开始是因为发生在马萨诸塞州一位老人身上的事情。题干关键词是dispute,life or death和Massachusetts man。文中B段提到,最近关于生与死以及医学与法律的争论。源于一位78岁马萨诸塞州男子的生死问题被提上法院议程。与题干意思一致,故选B。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3391312.html
相关试题推荐
Georgecalledhisbossfromtheairportbutit______(接电话的却是他的助手).washisassista
WhoLives?WhoDies?WhoDecides?A)SomehavecalleditaRi
WhoLives?WhoDies?WhoDecides?A)SomehavecalleditaRi
WhoLives?WhoDies?WhoDecides?A)SomehavecalleditaRi
WhoLives?WhoDies?WhoDecides?A)SomehavecalleditaRi
WhoLives?WhoDies?WhoDecides?A)SomehavecalleditaRi
Anewbatchofyoungwomen—membersoftheso-calledMillennial(千禧的)generati
Anewbatchofyoungwomen—membersoftheso-calledMillennial(千禧的)generati
[originaltext]TheBritishgovernmenthascalledformorementoconsiderac
[originaltext]TheBritishgovernmenthascalledformorementoconsiderac
随机试题
[originaltext]M:Ihaveaspecialguesttoday,Shirley.Shirley,youtrulyhave
Comparisonsweredrawnbetweenthedevelopmentoftelevisioninthe20thce
肩关节前脱位闭合复位急性期康复治疗的目的不包括A.控制疼痛 B.减轻炎症 C
胃液中内因子的作用为A.激活胃蛋白酶原 B.参与胃黏膜屏障作用 C.促进促胃
氨基糖苷类抗生素的抗菌作用机理是()A.抑制核酸代谢 B.抑制蛋白质合成
已知A企业2016年利润总额为400万元,利息费用20万元,折旧与摊销共计25万
患者,女性,26岁,结婚3年未孕。幼年曾患肺结核。妇检:子宫略小,后位,活动差,
呼吸衰竭患者动脉血氧分压小于A.80mmHg B.70mmHg C.60mm
人力资源需求预测时要进行环境与影响因素分析,以下属于竞争五要素分析法要分析的内容
1.背景材料:某一标段公路工程项目,采用工程量清单方式结算。按合同规定工程量计量
最新回复
(
0
)