首页
登录
职称英语
Who Lives? Who Dies? Who Decides?A)Some have called it a Ri
Who Lives? Who Dies? Who Decides?A)Some have called it a Ri
游客
2024-01-24
44
管理
问题
Who Lives? Who Dies? Who Decides?
A)Some have called it a Right to Die case. Others have labeled it a Right to Live case. One group of advocates has called for "death with dignity." Others have responded accusingly, "euthanasia".
B)At the center of the latest controversy about life and death, medicine and law, is a seventy-eight-year-old Massachusetts man whose existence hangs on a court order.
C)On one point, everyone agrees: Earle Spring is not the man he used to be. Once a strapping outdoorsman, he is now called senile by many, and mentally incompetent by the courts. He is, at worst, a member of living dead; at best, a shriveled version of his former self.
D)For more than two years, since his physical and then mental health began to deteriorate , Earle Spring has been kept alive by spending five hours on a kidney dialysis machine three times a week. Since January 1979, his family has pleaded to have him removed from the life-support system.
E)They believe deeply that he Earle Spring who was would not want to live as the Earle Spring who is. They believe they are advocates for the right to die in peace.
F)In the beginning, the court agrees. Possibly for the first time, they reeled last month in favor of withdrawing medical care from an elderly patient whose mind had deteriorated. The dialysis was stopped.
G)But then, in a sudden intervention, an outside nurse and doctor visited Earle Spring and testified that he was alert enough to "make a weak expression of his desire to live." And so the treatments were resumed.
H)Now, while the courts are waiting for new and more thorough evidence about Spring’ s mental state, the controversy rages about legal procedures; no judge ever visited Spring, no psychiatrist ever testified. And even more important, we are again forced to determine one person’ s right to die or to live.
I)This case makes the Karen Ann Quinlan story seem simple in comparison. Quinlan today hangs onto her "life" long after her "plug was pulled." But when the New Jersey court heard that case, Quinlan had no will. She had suffered brain death by any definition.
J)The Spring story is different. He is neither competent nor comatose. He lives in a gray area of consciousness. So the questions also range over the gray area of our consciences.
K)What should the relationship be between mental and physical treatment? Should we treat the incompetent as aggressively as the competent? Should we order heart surgery for one senile citizen? Should we take another off a kidney machine? Who is to decide?
L)Until recently, we didn’t have the technology to keep Earle Spring alive. Until recently, the-life-and-death decisions about the senile elderly or the retarded or the institutionalized were made privately between families and medical people. Now, increasingly, in States like Massachusetts, they are made publicly and legally.
M)Clearly there are no absolutes in this case. No right to die. No right to live. We have to take into account many social as well as medical factors. How much of the resources of a society or a family should be allotted to a member who no longer recognizes it? How many sacrifices should the healthy and vital make for the terminally or permanently ill and disabled?
N)In England, where kidney dialysis machines are scarce, Earle Spring would never have remained on one. In America, one Earle Spring can decimate the energy and income of an entire family.
O)But the Spring case is a crucial, scary one that could affect all those living under that dubious sentence "incompetent" or that shaky diagnosis "senile". So it seems to me that if there is any mental activity at all, then disconnecting him from life would be a dangerous precedent, far more dangerous than letting him continue.
P)The court ruled originally in favor of taking Spring off the machine. It ruled that this is what Earle Spring would have wanted. I have no doubt that his family believes it. I have no doubt of their affection or their pain.
Q)But I remember, too, what my grandfather used to say: No one wants to live to be one hundred until you ask the man who is ninety-nine. Well, no one, including Earle Spring, wants to live to be senile. But once senile, he may well want to live. We simply have to give him the benefit of the doubt. Any doubt. [br] The story of Karen Ann Quinlan seems simple because of her brain death.
选项
答案
I
解析
题干:由于凯伦·安·昆兰的大脑已经死亡,她的故事简单多了。题干关键词是Karen Ann Quinlan,simple和brain death。文中I段提到,和这个案例比起来,凯伦·安·昆兰的故事似乎简单多了。到今天为止,昆兰在撤离医疗护理后已经活了很长时间了。而当新泽西州法院听说后,她并无意愿上法庭,因为她已经脑死亡了。与题干意思吻合,故选I。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3391317.html
相关试题推荐
Georgecalledhisbossfromtheairportbutit______(接电话的却是他的助手).washisassista
WhoLives?WhoDies?WhoDecides?A)SomehavecalleditaRi
WhoLives?WhoDies?WhoDecides?A)SomehavecalleditaRi
WhoLives?WhoDies?WhoDecides?A)SomehavecalleditaRi
WhoLives?WhoDies?WhoDecides?A)SomehavecalleditaRi
Anewbatchofyoungwomen—membersoftheso-calledMillennial(千禧的)generati
Anewbatchofyoungwomen—membersoftheso-calledMillennial(千禧的)generati
Anewbatchofyoungwomen—membersoftheso-calledMillennial(千禧的)generati
Anewbatchofyoungwomen—membersoftheso-calledMillennial(千禧的)generati
[originaltext]TheBritishgovernmenthascalledformorementoconsiderac
随机试题
Thecommissionacknowledgedthatnoamountofmoneyorstaffmemberscanensure
Mostearthquakesoccurwithintheupper15milesoftheearth’ssurface.But
社会变迁和社会发展是一个等同概念。()
女性,26岁,孕2~3个月反复自然流产3次,月经规律,基础体温双相,丈夫精液检查
《关于促进互联网金融健康发展的指导意见》对互联网金融发展的总体要求,不包括(
眼睛:光线A.耳朵:声音 B.草坪:环保 C.山峦:风景 D.航母:航行
中国共产党提出建设社会主义核心价值体系的战略任务是在( ) A.十六届五中全
男性,45岁,间断腹痛、腹泻3年,排便4~5次/天,便不成形,无脓血、黏液,服黄
子宫颈早期浸润癌的病理变化包括A.癌组织突破基底膜 B.多由鳞状上皮直接癌变
某药品零售连锁企业既有网上药店,又有实体门店。该企业销售含麻黄碱类复方制剂时,其
最新回复
(
0
)