首页
登录
职称英语
In recent years criticisms have been voiced concerning sexist bias in the En
In recent years criticisms have been voiced concerning sexist bias in the En
游客
2023-11-03
79
管理
问题
In recent years criticisms have been voiced concerning sexist bias in the English language. It has been argued that some of the vocabulary and grammar we use reflects and reinforces a traditional view of the world as one in which men are dominant and women play a secondary role.
Take the word "chairman", for example. While this can in fact apply to people of both sexes, it appears to some people to be male-oriented as it ends in "man". In the past people taking the role of chairman were exclusively male, and the word was obviously originally a compound of "chair" and "man". Many English speakers, however, have ceased to view this word as a compound and no more feel it to be composed of two units, "chair" and "man", than they perceive "cupboard" as composed of "cup" and "board". In addition the continued use of chairman might be defended on the grounds that the final syllable is pronounced /m’n/ rather than / m
n/, just like the final syllable of woman. Despite such considerations other speakers take a contrary view and are sensitive to the components of which it is made up. They clearly perceive it as a title which perpetuates traditional ideas about the place of women in society. For this reason they seek to replace it with neutral terms such as "chairperson" or "chair" , so that it is now possible to ask questions such as: "Who is chair of the committee?"
Other changes advocated include the replacement of words such as "postman", "fireman" and "policeman" with more clearly neutral terms such as "postal worker", "fire-fighter" and "police officer". There is, however, continuing controversy about how far such language changes should go. Should changes also be considered to traditional idioms such as "man in the street" and titles such as "Peking Man"? What about those words where the male meaning of "man" is no longer dominant, such as "manhandle"?
To the extent that changes have taken place, they have done so more in the written language and formal pronouncements than in everyday speech. You would be quite likely to read in the paper that "Postal workers are to receive a pay increase". But "Has the postman been?" would be most likely to be heard in informal conversation. Here "postman" remains firmly entrenched in popular usage.
The lack of a sex-neutral third-person singular in English has also attracted attention. How, for example, do we fill in the blank in the following sentence? "A good teacher always makes sure is well prepared for the lesson. " Traditionally, this would be filled in with "he". The male pronoun in such cases is clearly intended to refer to both sexes. It is still widely used in this way, but some people, especially women, dislike it. They may prefer to add the female pronoun to the male, as in "A good teacher always makes sure he or she is well prepared for the lesson". Some people, however, feel that this looks and sounds awkward. Another solution is to use the plural "they" for the singular; "A good teacher always makes sure they are well prepared for the lesson. " This is often heard in conversation, but is less frequent in formal written English. More cautious souls can avoid the problem altogether by rephrasing in the plural: "Good teachers always make sure they are well prepared for the lesson. "
The extent to which language reflects and shapes attitudes and behaviors is a matter of conjecture. Chinese, Japanese, Persian and Turkish do not make the kinds of sex distinctions English makes through its system of pronouns, but it would be difficult to maintain that males who speak these languages are less sexist than males who speak English! [br] What’s the difference between "postal worker" and "postman" according to the passage?
选项
A、The former is informal; the latter is formal.
B、The former is formal; the latter is informal.
C、They have the same usage.
D、Both of them are informal.
答案
B
解析
细节题。从第四段You would be quite likely to read in the paper that“Postal workers are to receivea pay increase”.But“Has the postman been?”would be most likely to be heard in informal conversation.可以看出,postal worker是正式用法,常出现在报纸等书面文字中,而postman则是非正式用法,常用在15语中,所以[B]是正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3155080.html
相关试题推荐
AccordingtotheAmericanCollegeHealthAssociation’smostrecentannualna
AccordingtotheAmericanCollegeHealthAssociation’smostrecentannualna
AccordingtotheAmericanCollegeHealthAssociation’smostrecentannualna
InrecentyearscriticismshavebeenvoicedconcerningsexistbiasintheEn
InrecentyearscriticismshavebeenvoicedconcerningsexistbiasintheEn
InrecentyearscriticismshavebeenvoicedconcerningsexistbiasintheEn
"Untilrecently,Ithoughtthattherewouldneveragainbeanopportunityto
"Untilrecently,Ithoughtthattherewouldneveragainbeanopportunityto
"Untilrecently,Ithoughtthattherewouldneveragainbeanopportunityto
RecentlyaBJinformationcompanydidasurveyofstudentlifeamongmoreth
随机试题
Thegreatchariotofsociety,whichforsolonghadrundownthegentleslop
TheSantaAnaappealscourtupheldanearlierjuryverdictawarding$3.2mi
TheEnglishlanguageexistsinaconditionofeverlastingdanger,itsAmeri
Threehundredyearsagonewstravelledbywordofmouthorletter.They【C1】_
公路交通安全设施施工过程应有真实、准确、齐全、完整的施工原始记录、试验检测数据、
3月2日,某交易者买入10手5月份A期货合约同时卖出10手7月该期货合约,价格分
有关尖锐湿疣的治疗,错误的是()。A.药物治疗适用于小的病灶 B.常用药物为
评估形势时首先应将以下的哪一项内容看作一个整体,通过调查进行分析A.社会需求
下列关于血小板的描述,错误的是A.具有黏附和聚集作用 B.由骨髓中成熟的单核细
当通信企业既提供竞争性业务又提供垄断性业务并实施交叉补贴时,其()业务的定价有
最新回复
(
0
)