首页
登录
职称英语
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too litt
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too litt
游客
2023-09-14
29
管理
问题
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy(冷漠) and stagnation(呆滞). Too much conflict leads to divisiveness(分裂) and hostility. Moderate levels of conflict, however, can spark creativity and motivate people in a healthy and competitive way.
Recent research by Professor Charles R. Schwenk, however, suggests that the optimal level of conflict may be more complex to determine than these simple generalizations. He studied perception of conflict among a sample of executives. Some of the executives worked for profit-making organizations and others for not-fur-profit organizations.
Somewhat surprisingly, Schwenk found that opinions about conflict varied systematically as a function of the type of organization. Specifically, managers in not-for-profit organizations strongly believed that conflict was beneficial to their organizations and that it promoted higher quality decision making than might be achieved in the absence of conflict.
Managers of for-profit organizations saw a different picture. They believed that conflict generally was damaging and usually led to poor-quality decision making in their organizations. Schwenk interpreted these results in term of the criteria for effective decision making suggested by the executives. In the profit-seeking organization, decision-making effectiveness was most often assessed in financial terms. The executives believed that consensus rather than conflict enhanced financial indicators.
In the not-for-profit organizations, decision-making effectiveness was defined from the perspective of satisfying constituents. Given the complexities and ambiguities associated with satisfying many diverse constituents executives perceived that conflict led to more considered and acceptable decisions. [br] The passage suggests that in for-profit organizations_______.
选项
A、there is no end of conflict
B、expression of different opinions is encouraged
C、decisions must be justifiable
D、success lies in general agreement
答案
D
解析
本题为逻辑推断题,由第四段可知,分歧能导致一些不明智的决策,即成功依赖于意见上的一致,所以选D。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3011964.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]M:Hi,Helen.Howareyoudoing?W:Prettygood.Thanks.Haveyou
[originaltext]M:Hi,Helen.Howareyoudoing?W:Prettygood.Thanks.Haveyou
[originaltext]M:Hi,Helen.Howareyoudoing?W:Prettygood.Thanks.Haveyou
[audioFiles]audio_eusm_j70_001(20082)[/audioFiles]A、Thefoodwasprettygoodth
Thepassageismainlyaboutthedifferencesbetweenconventionalandorganicfar
Thepassageismainlyaboutthedifferencesbetweenconventionalandorganicfar
Thepassageismainlyaboutthedifferencesbetweenconventionalandorganicfar
Thepassageismainlyaboutthedifferencesbetweenconventionalandorganicfar
Thepassageismainlyaboutthedifferencesbetweenconventionalandorganicfar
Tooursurprise,theprettylittlegirl____________________(始终助人为乐).derivedpleas
随机试题
Sincewearesocialbeings,thequalityofourlivesdependsinlargemeasur
[originaltext]Intheearly1950s,researchersfoundthatpeoplescoredlowe
Corporationsasagroupofferavarietyofjobs.Mostlargecompaniessendp
[originaltext]Inafamilywheretherolesofmenandwomenarenotsharply
化脓性骨髓炎骨改变出现的时间是:()A.3天后 B.1周后 C.2
下列关于缩宫素兴奋子宫平滑肌作用抑制的描述中,错误的是A.作用于子宫平滑肌上的
在动力电缆与控制电缆之间,应设置层间耐火隔板。
A.线粒体 B.核蛋白体 C.溶酶体 D.细胞核 E.细胞液RNA合成的
以下哪项不是全冠印模的要求A.边缘清晰 B.面清晰 C.关系正确 D.
男性,52岁,20年前患乙型肝炎,近3个月腹胀,3年前曾因鱼刺发生上消化道出血。
最新回复
(
0
)