首页
登录
职称英语
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on
游客
2023-07-18
45
管理
问题
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on 29 November by Undergrad, a Students’ Union magazine of our university. The main purpose behind the election was to give teachers an opportunity to review their teaching methods in light of the results.
Our concern is whether the election of one single teacher from each faculty by undergraduate students will substantially improve the quality of teaching. Surely this would be much better achieved by an extensive and standardized course-evaluation system.
According to the article on page 33 of the 3rd edition of Undergrad, the writer and his colleagues decided that it was time to "get their own back" on the teachers. There appears to be a strong aggressive tone on the whole. This seems contrary to the motive originally intended. We fear that an "unpopularity poll" is what really results.
This election was governed by the regulations of the Best Teacher Award, which required a minimum of 15 percent of voters for the results to be valid. However, as there was a very poor turnout, 17 of the "winners" were elected by less than 15 percent, which greatly reduced the representativeness of the outcome.
The teachers involved are not even given details of the masons for voting. We wonder how the organizing body can help these teachers improve their teaching methods when the evidence for their performance cannot be produced. The whole exercise is therefore worthless without these reasons made available.
A few popular newspapers have reported on the election, but the data shown are misleading. They do not show how many students voted for the teachers, merely rows of vague percentages. Most of the articles do not even state the results of the election, but only the names of elected teachers. We object to their irresponsible behaviour to both the voters and teachers alike. We believe the whole university wishes to strive for excellence in a constructive way.
Our conclusion is that the Worst Teacher Award has, from the beginning, lost sight of its virtuous purpose and has turned into something that destroys the image of our university teachers and, far worse, the mutual relationship between teachers and students. [br] It can be inferred from the passage that ______.
选项
A、the bad teachers will be highly motivated by the constructive results of the survey
B、the reports in most articles should avoid mentioning the names of those elected had teachers
C、the election will help improve the teacher-student relationship
D、the rules for electing the worst teachers were made without the approval of the university
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2847348.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]W:Excuseme,wouldyoumindansweringafewquestions?M:Well,
[originaltext]W:Excuseme,wouldyoumindansweringafewquestions?M:Well,
[originaltext]W:Excuseme,wouldyoumindansweringafewquestions?M:Well,
[originaltext]W:Excuseme,wouldyoumindansweringafewquestions?M:Well,
AnewreportreleasedbytheAmericanFederationofTeachers(AFT)remindsu
[originaltext]W:AlexisanEnglishteacherinIranandtodaywe’dliketoshar
[originaltext]W:AlexisanEnglishteacherinIranandtodaywe’dliketoshar
[originaltext]W:Howcanourhistoryteachergiveussuchadifficultassignmen
[originaltext]W:Howcanourhistoryteachergiveussuchadifficultassignmen
[originaltext]W:Howcanourhistoryteachergiveussuchadifficultassignmen
随机试题
Educationofexceptionalchildrenmeansprovisionofspecialeducationalser
WhatIfYouCouldLearnEverything?[A]Imagineeverystuden
下面的协议中属于应用层协议的是()A.SNMP B.ARP C.ICMP
会阴部不慎骑跨在钢管上,立即出现尿道口滴血,之后不能排尿,发生尿潴留,体检发现,
在临床上,TDM(治疗药物监测)使用的基本原则不包括()。A.治疗指数低的药物
原始凭证经会计机构、会计人员审核后,对记载不准确、不完整的原始凭证,予以退回,要
通过对人力资源内部能力的客观的全面分析,将有利于企业针对人力资源现存的问题,有效
随着竞争的加剧,通信企业越来越关注客户的需求与偏好,并为他们提供量身定制的个性化
某通信基本建设基础上各年现金流量预测数据如下表: 经计算,在时i1=10%
关于女性生殖器淋巴引流,哪项错误A.宫颈淋巴大部分汇入骶前淋巴结 B.女性生殖
最新回复
(
0
)