首页
登录
职称英语
October 3
October 3
游客
2025-06-18
12
管理
问题
October 3rd, 2009
Dear Sir,
In your editorial on August 31st, there seems to be some confused thinking in attempting to establish a direct relationship between the desire of the OAA airlines to negotiate more equitable agreements with the United States for air-traffic rights and the cost of air travel for the public.
It is simply untrue that the Asian carriers are not looking for increased access to the U.S. market, including its domestic market; they are, as part of balanced agreements that provide equality of opportunity. So long as the U.S. takes the inequitable arrangements enshrined in current agreements as a starting point for negotiation, however, there is no chance that U. S. carriers will be granted more regional rights which further unbalance the economic opportunities available to each side. Most importantly from the consumer’s viewpoint, it has yet to be demonstrated that in those regional sectors where U. S. carriers currently operate—such as Hong Kong and Tokyo—they have added anything in terms of price, quality of service, innovation or seat availability in peak seasons.
Turning to cost, I am not sure to which Merrill Larrych study you are referring, but it would be simplistic to compare seat-mile costs of narrow-body operation over U. S. domestic sectors with wide-body operation over international sectors; comparative studies of seat-mile costs are valid only if they compare similar aircraft operating over identical sectors. On this basis, International Civil Aviation Organization figures show that Asian carriers are highly competitive. Of course, given its operating environment Japan Air Lines will have high seat-mile costs, while a carrier based in Southeast Asia, such as Singapore Airlines, will have relatively low costs. But it is a fallacy to assume this means "higher ticket prices or higher taxes" for the "hapless Asian air traveller" if he travels on JAL.
The Japanese carriers have to compete in the Asian market place with others, and costs cannot simply be passed on to the consumer or taxpayer. The people who really pay the price or reap the reward of differing cost levels are the share holders.
RICHARD. T. STIRLAND
Director General
Orient Airlines Association [br] What is the main purpose of writing this letter?
选项
A、Retorting the viewpoint from a editorial on August 31 st
B、Analyzing the feasibility of negotiating more equitable agreements with USA
C、Comparing the Asian market and US market for OAA
D、Discussing the relationship between ticket price and tax
答案
A
解析
由信中第一段第1行“some confused thinking”及第二段第1句“It is simply untrue that…”等可知正确项是(A)“反驳8月31日发表的一篇社论的观点”。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/4124400.html
相关试题推荐
October3
October3
To:From:KeithWilsonDate:Thursday,October23Subject:Mr.CharlieMcGrege
To:From:KeithWilsonDate:Thursday,October23Subject:Mr.CharlieMcGrege
To:From:KeithWilsonDate:Thursday,October23Subject:Mr.CharlieMcGrege
To:JuliaDavisFrom:SabrinaTanDate:October22Subject:Yourdeliverys
October26,2009Dr.KathleenWu,DirectorKathleenManagementConsultantsInc.
October26,2009Dr.KathleenWu,DirectorKathleenManagementConsultantsInc.
To:AlldepartmentmanagersFrom:MollyStuartDate:16October2009Subject:In
To:AlldepartmentmanagersFrom:MollyStuartDate:16October2009Subject:In
随机试题
Jenny(do)______somecleaningeveryweekend.does本题考查时态。根据时间状语everyweekend可知这里
Onaclear,colddayinearlyMarch2019,JustinJordan,afifth-generation
应聘信说明:假设你是李华,得知Intel公司招聘行政助理,给人力资源部经理Black先生写一封应聘信。内容:1.即将从北京大学毕业,行政
PartⅡReadingComprehension(SkimmingandScanning)Directions:Inthispart,y
QuickChangeinStrategyforaBooksellerInthemovieY
以下无助于抑制干扰源的措施是()。A.通过在干扰源回路串联电感或电阻以及增加续
白术与苍术并用的方剂是( )。A.健脾丸 B.完带汤 C.参苓白术散 D
(2018年真题)关于资产与负债变化对现金流量的影响,下列表述中,正确的有(
简述学生的性格差异及其教育含义。
依据《建设工程安全生产管理条例》规定,注册监理工程师未执行法律、法规和工程建设强
最新回复
(
0
)