首页
登录
职称英语
•Read the following extract from an article about Over-Capacity in the Car Busin
•Read the following extract from an article about Over-Capacity in the Car Busin
游客
2025-05-28
20
管理
问题
•Read the following extract from an article about Over-Capacity in the Car Business.
•For each question 15—20, mark one letter (A, B, C, or D) on your Answer Sheet for the answer you choose.
Since the days of Henry Ford’s dominance of the car market in the 1920s up to the present day, the car industry has continued to grow. Some companies, such as British Leyland, failed to survive the turbulent business world of the 1970s despite being government-owned. During the 1960s and 1970s, as growth in profit became more difficult to achieve due to increased competition, mainly from the Japanese, the industry turned to efficient production methods in order to create a competitive advantage. However, once all the major players in the industry had become as efficient as possible, developing a cost advantage was more difficult to achieve. In addition, car companies from Asia, such as Daewoo, Samsung and Kia, have developed cheaper, more affordable alternatives for the discerning western buyers. Such car companies are part-funded by their respective governments but enjoy considerably lower labor costs.
Increasing productive capacity has led to car companies aiming to use economies of scale as the main way of reducing cost, although this has unfortunately led to businesses having surplus capacity. This spare capacity occurs when the industry as a whole expands ahead of, or in anticipation of, a growth in customer demand. Such growth in capacity has meant that supply outstrips demand by some 30%, i.e., car companies could cut back on their capacity levels by 30%, and still meet all customer demands.
The result has been a series of joint agreements and mergers between car companies, with a view to either using capacity, or losing capacity altogether by selling off parts of a business. The other problem is the high cost of developing new vehicles: the standard response to the high cost is to either rejuvenate or re-launch old vehicles with new technology. But there are enough companies developing new models that any business, which does not, stands to lose out. The main fear in the car industry is over-capacity—experts predict that by 2001, the industry may produce 23 million cars more than it can sell!
In 1998 there was a spate of company mergers—e.g. In January 1999, Ford paid £4 billion for Volvo’s car division; Volvo claimed that it needed economies of scale, allowing it to focus on buses, engines and aerospace and to acquire shares in two major truck-making businesses. Ford intended to distribute Volvos with its own cars and hoped to use Volvo’s reputation for technological excellence to develop new cars, using common research platforms to save money.
Renault, on the other hand, announced a joint agreement with Nissan, the debt-ridden Japanese company, to purchase a 37% stake. For Renault, the problem was not over-capacity, but rather the lack of product range. Renault was 44% owned by the French government, which obviously wanted to protect one of its major companies and wealth creators. However, Renault had concentrated its major marketing effort on domestic demand in France; as the domestic market fell, profit tumbled. The expiry in 1999 of the "gentlemen’s agreement" which limited car sales from Japan was probably the main reason for teaming up with Nissan. Nissan, however, had borrowed approximately £15 billion in order to expand its productive capacity and had lost money in six of the last seven years. One estimate put 1998’s losses at nearly £1 billion. The cost savings for both companies are not likely to occur until 2002, resulting mainly from purchasing economies of scale. Renault seems to have got caught between the large manufacturers who achieve economies of scale and the smaller specialist manufacturers. [br] Once all the major companies in the car industry had become as efficient as possible,
选项
A、they turned to use economies of scales as the main way of reducing cost.
B、there came increased productive capacity.
C、there was no way to reduce cost.
D、the main fear in the car industry became over-capacity.
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/4094457.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]Whattypeofarticlesdoyouwriteforthenewspaper?(A)Ifocus
[originaltext]Whattypeofarticlesdoyouwriteforthenewspaper?(A)Ifocus
[originaltext]Whattypeofarticlesdoyouwriteforthenewspaper?(A)Ifocus
TaskOne-Job•Forquestions13-17,matchtheextractswiththepeople,listed
TaskOne-Job•Forquestions13-17,matchtheextractswiththepeople,listed
TaskOne-Job•Forquestions13-17,matchtheextractswiththepeople,listed
TASKONE—ADVANTAGE•Forquestions13—17,matchtheextractswiththeadvantages
TASKONE—ADVANTAGE•Forquestions13—17,matchtheextractswiththeadvantages
TASKONE—ADVANTAGE•Forquestions13—17,matchtheextractswiththeadvantages
TASKONE—ADVANTAGE•Forquestions13—17,matchtheextractswiththeadvantages
随机试题
Teachersneedtobeawareoftheemotional,intellectual,andphysicalchang
[originaltext]TorrentialrainhascontinuedtolashnorthernEurope,causingex
A.亚甲蓝(美蓝) B.乙酰胺 C.阿托品 D.维生素K E.纳洛酮氟乙
违约损失率的计算公式是()。A.LGD=1-回收率 B.LGD=1-回收
(2017年真题)证券公司从事介绍业务时,与期货公司签订的书面委托协议应当载明的
科目汇总表账务处理程序适合于经济业务较少的单位。()
国库券发行之后,可以在证券交易所上市交易(买卖)。请根据下表提供的信息回答下述问
下列不属于克里斯塔勒中心地理论的原则是()A.市场原则 B.交通原则 C.
按照期权市场类型的不同,期权可以分为()。A.商品期权 B.金融期权 C.
案例三: 一般资料:求助者,男性,21岁,大学二年级学生。 案例介绍:该求助
最新回复
(
0
)