首页
登录
职称英语
For the longest time, I couldn’t get worked up about privacy: my right to it
For the longest time, I couldn’t get worked up about privacy: my right to it
游客
2025-05-07
19
管理
问题
For the longest time, I couldn’t get worked up about privacy: my right to it; how it’s dying; how we’re headed for an even more wired, underregulated, overintrusive, privacy-deprived planet.
I should also point out that as news director for Pathfinder, Time Inc.’s mega info mall,and a guy who makes his living on the Web, I know better than most people that we’re hurtling toward an even more intrusive world. We’re all being watched by computers whenever we visit Websites; by the mere act of "browsing" (it sounds so passive!) we’re going public in a way that was unimaginable a decade ago. I know this because I’m a watcher too. When people come to my Website, without ever knowing their names, I can peer over their shoulders, recording what they look at, timing how long they stay on a particular page, following them around Pathfinder’s sprawling offerings.
None of this would bother me in the least, I suspect, if a few years ago, my phone, like Marley’s ghost, hadn’t given me a glimpse of the nightmares to come. On Thanksgiving weekend in 1995, someone (presumably a critic of a book my wife and I had just written about computer hackers) forwarded my home telephone number to an out-of-state answering machine, where unsuspecting callers trying to reach me heard a male voice identify himself as me and say some extremely rude things. Then, with typical hacker aplomb, the prankster asked people to leave their messages (which to my surprise many callers, including my mother, did). This went on for several days until my wife and I figured out that something was wrong ("Hey...why hasn’t the phone rung since Wednesday?") and got our phone service restored.
It seemed funny at first, and it gave us a swell story to tell on our book tour. But the interloper who seized our telephone line continued to hit us even after the tour ended. And hit us again and again for the next six months. The phone company seemed powerless. Its security folks moved us to one unlisted number after another, half a dozen times. They put special pin codes in place. They put traces on the line. But the troublemaker kept breaking through.
If our hacker had been truly evil and omnipotent as only fictional movie hackers are, there would probably have been even worse ways he could have threatened my privacy. He could have sabotaged my credit rating. He could have eavesdropped on my telephone conversations or siphoned off my e-mail. He could have called in my mortgage, discontinued my health insurance or obliterated my Social Security number. Like Sandra Bullock in the Net, I could have been a digital untouchable, wandering the planet without a connection to the rest of humanity. (Although if I didn’t have to pay back school loans, it might be worth it. Just a thought. )
Still, I remember feeling violated at the time and as powerless as a minnow in a flash flood. Someone was invading my private space—my family’s private space—and there was nothing I or the authorities could do. It was as close to a technological epiphany as I have ever been. And as I watched my personal digital hell unfold, it struck me that our privacy—mine and yours—has already disappeared, not in one Big Brotherly blitzkrieg but in Little Brotherly moments, bit by bit.
Losing control of your telephone, of course, is the least of it. After all, most of us voluntarily give out our phone number and address when we allow ourselves to be listed in the White Pages. Most of us go a lot further than that. We register our whereabouts whenever we put a bank card in an ATM machine or drive through an E-Z Pass lane on the highway. We submit to being photographed every day—20 times a day on average if you live or work in New York City—by surveillance cameras. We make public our interests and our purchasing habits every time we shop by mail order or visit a commercial Website. [br] According to the passage, the hackers in the movie would conduct following thing EXCEPT______.
选项
A、eavesdropping
B、damaging a Social Security number
C、threatening in a flash flood
D、making a person information disappear in the date base
答案
C
解析
细节题。根据文中的“Still,I remember feeling violated at the time and as powerless as a minnow in a flash flood.”可知,作者仍然记得那时被侵犯的感觉,就像在急流中的小鱼一样无能为力。这只是打了一个比喻,与电影中的黑客行为无关,因此正确答案是C项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/4065250.html
相关试题推荐
Forthelongesttime,Icouldn’tgetworkedupaboutprivacy:myrighttoit
Forthelongesttime,Icouldn’tgetworkedupaboutprivacy:myrighttoit
Forthelongesttime,Icouldn’tgetworkedupaboutprivacy:myrighttoit
SinceXeroxcouldn’tworksmoothly,heassumedthatsomeonehad______withit.A
Ifyoucouldn’tattendeitheroftheconcertsandare______gnashingyourteeth
Thisisthe(longest)flightI(haveevertaken).BythetimewegettoLosAnge
ThisisthelongestflightIhaveevertaken.BythetimewegettoLosAngeles,
Icouldn’tsleeplastnightbecausethetapinthebathroomwas______.A、spilling
Hecouldn’tlieconvincinglyenoughtotakeachild______.A、awayB、downC、inD、u
Muchas______,Icouldn’tlendhimthemoneybecauseIsimplydidn’thavethatm
随机试题
Youwillhearfivedifferentpeopletalkingaboutproblemsandresponsesto
FiveCommonMistakesinConversationandTheirSolutionsI.Notlis
EarlyLandPolicyGoverningbodiesoftheAme
编制设计概算的主要依据是()。A.可行性研究报告 B.初步设计图纸和说明
A.流行病学知识 B.毒理学知识 C.卫生统计学知识 D.劳动卫生与职业病
根据《水利工程工程量清单计价规范》(GB50501),关于钢筋、钢构件加工及安装
债券的久期和到期时间是()关系。A.正相关 B.无关 C.负相关 D.不
结构类型属于三萜类化合物,临床上可用于抗肝炎的药物是()。A.甜菊苷 B.紫
请认真阅读下列材料,并按要求作答。 请根据上述材料完成下列任务: (1)
已知某电厂1lOV直流系统蓄电池仅带控制负荷,经常电流为25A,放电初期(0~
最新回复
(
0
)