首页
登录
职称英语
As with any work of art, the merit of Chapman Kelley’s "Wildflower Works I "
As with any work of art, the merit of Chapman Kelley’s "Wildflower Works I "
游客
2025-05-02
19
管理
问题
As with any work of art, the merit of Chapman Kelley’s "Wildflower Works I " was in the eye of the beholder.
Kelley, who normally works with paint and canvas, considered the twin oval gardens planted in 1984 at Daley Bicentennial Park his most important piece.
The Chicago Park District considered it a patch of raggedy vegetation on public property that could be dug up and replanted at will like the flower boxes along Michigan Avenue. And that’s what happened in June 2004, when the district decided to create a more orderly vista for pedestrians crossing from Millennium Park via the new Frank Gehry footbridge.
If you’re looking for evidence that the rubes who run the Park District don’t know art when they see it, all you have to do is visit what’s left of Kelley’s masterpiece. The exuberant 1. 5-acre tangle of leggy wildflowers is now confined to a tidy rectangle, restrained on all sides by a knee-high hedge and surrounded by a closely cropped lawn. White hydrangeas and pink shrub roses complete the look. We don’t know who’s responsible for the redesign, but we’ll bet the carpet in his home doesn’t go with the furniture.
Still, you’d think the Park District was within its rights to plow under the prairie. Wrong. Kelley just won at lawsuit in which he argued that the garden was public and therefore protected by the federal Visual Artists Rights Act. Under that law, the district should have given him 90 days’ notice that it intended to mess with his artwork instead of rushing headlong into the demolition, a la Meigs Field. That way Kelley could have mounted a legal challenge, or at least removed the plants.
Park District officials said they never considered the garden a work of art, even though it was installed by an established artist and not, say, Joe’s sod and landscaping. We can understand their confusion. Just recently, we figured out that the caged greenery directly south of Pritzker Pavilion is supposed to be an architectural statement and not a Christmas tree lot.
All that’s left is for the district to compensate Kelley for his loss. Whatever price the parties settle on, let’s hope the agreement also provides for the removal of the rest of "Wildflower Works I. " If it wash’t an eyesore before—and plenty of people thought it was...it sure is now. [br] What’s the author’s attitude towards the present "Wildflower Works I "?
选项
A、He takes a neutral position.
B、He believes in the long arm of the law.
C、He regards it a masterpiece of public art.
D、He is in favor of demolishing the ugly garden.
答案
D
解析
题目问:文章作者对“Wildflower Works I”的态度如何?根据文章内容,现在的景观已经不伦不类,大部分被改造了,看着碍眼,所以期待将剩余的“野花工程I”拆除。故作者对现在的野花工程的态度是赞同拆除丑陋的花园。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/4059339.html
相关试题推荐
Aswithanyworkofart,themeritofChapmanKelley’s"WildflowerWorksI"
Aswithanyworkofart,themeritofChapmanKelley’s"WildflowerWorksI"
Aswithanyworkofart,themeritofChapmanKelley’s"WildflowerWorksI"
Aswithanyworkofart,themeritofChapmanKelley’s"WildflowerWorksI"
Aswithanyworkofart,themeritofChapmanKelley’s"WildflowerWorksI"
Aswithanyworkofart,themeritofChapmanKelley’s"WildflowerWorksI"
随机试题
Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteacompositionentitledProspe
Isfamilyimportantinyourcountry? Ithinknoonewilldenytheimportanceof
IntheUnitedStates,thefirstdaynurserywasopenedin1854.Nurseriesw
Theadvantagesanddisadvantagesofalargepopulationhavelongbeena(1)__
[originaltext]W:Wellhithere.Whatareyoulookingfortoday?M:Uh,I’mjustl
孕妇24岁,GP,孕39周,入院前一天阴道大量流水,24小时后行缩宫素引产,第一
对物体的知觉倾向于以外部参照作为信息加工的依据,态度和自我知觉更易受周围的人们,
中国药典的附录包括A.制剂通则B.非通用检测方法C.效价测定D.含量E.贮藏
朱先生,20岁。破伤风患者,抽搐频繁,引起肘关节脱位,呼吸道分泌物多,此时首先应
根据《税务行政复议规则》,纳税人对税务机关( )不服,经复议才能向法院提起行政诉
最新回复
(
0
)