首页
登录
职称英语
One of the most difficult situations that a researcher can encounter is to s
One of the most difficult situations that a researcher can encounter is to s
游客
2025-04-25
55
管理
问题
One of the most difficult situations that a researcher can encounter is to see or suspect that a colleague has violated the ethical standards of the research community. It is easy to find excuses to do nothing, but someone who has witnessed misconduct has an unmistakable obligation to act. At the most immediate level, misconduct can seriously obstruct or damage one’s own research or the research of colleagues. 1)
More broadly, even a single case of misconduct can malign scientists and their institutions, which in turn can result in the imposition of counterproductive regulations, and shake public confidence in the integrity of science.
To be sure, raising a concern about unethical conduct is rarely an easy thing to do. In some cases, anonymity is possible—but not always. Reprisals by the accused person and by skeptical colleagues have occurred in the past and have had serious consequences. 2)
Any allegation of misconduct is a very important charge that needs to be taken seriously. If mishandled, an allegation can gravely damage the person charged, the one who makes the charge, the institutions involved, and science in general.
Someone who is confronting a problem involving research ethics usually has more options than are immediately apparent. In most cases the best thing to do is to discuss the situation with a trusted friend or advisor. 3)
In universities, faculty advisors, department chairs, and other senior faculty call be invaluable sources of advice in deciding whether to go forward with a complaint.
An important consideration is deciding when to put a complaint in writing. Once in writing, universities are obligated to deal with a complaint in a more formal manner than if it is made verbally. 4)
Putting a complaint in writing can have serious consequences for the career of a scientist and should be undertaken only after thorough consideration.
The National Science Foundation and Public Health Service require all research institutions that receive public funds to have procedures in place to deal with allegations of unethical practice. 5)
These procedures take into account fairness for the accused, protection for the accuser, coordination with funding agencies, and requirements for confidentiality and disclosure.
In addition, many universities and other research institutions have designated an ombudsman, ethics officer, or other official who is available to discuss situations involving research ethics. Such discussions are carried out in the strictest confidence whenever possible. Some institutions provide multiple entry points, so that complainants can go to a person with whom they feel comfortable. [br]
选项
答案
这些步骤考虑到了被指控人的公平性、对指控人的保护、与赞助机构的协调以及对保密和披露工作的要求。
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/4052869.html
相关试题推荐
Whatarethechancesthatwewillencountersomealienformoflife,asweex
Whatarethechancesthatwewillencountersomealienformoflife,asweex
Whatarethechancesthatwewillencountersomealienformoflife,asweex
Whatarethechancesthatwewillencountersomealienformoflife,asweex
Itusedtobesostraightforward.Ateamofresearchersworkingtogetherin
Itusedtobesostraightforward.Ateamofresearchersworkingtogetherin
Itusedtobesostraightforward.Ateamofresearchersworkingtogetherin
Theroleofgovernmentinenvironmentalmanagementisdifficultbutinescapa
Theroleofgovernmentinenvironmentalmanagementisdifficultbutinescapa
Theroleofgovernmentinenvironmentalmanagementisdifficultbutinescapa
随机试题
A—midfieldB—backfieldC—cheerteamD—shootE—cornerballF—kick-offG—stopping
A.p>-1 B.p>0 C.p≥0 D.p≥-1
A."夫医者,非仁爱之士,不可托也;非聪明理达,不可任也;非廉洁淳厚,不可信也。
叶圣陶先生曾说:“教材无非是个例子,凭这个例子要使学生能够举一反三,练成阅读和作
《千金》犀角散适用于A.黄疸热重于湿证 B.黄疸湿重于热证 C.黄疸胆
某混凝土试块强度值不满足规范要求,但经法定检测单位对混凝土实体强度经过法定检测后
下列反映投资收益的有关指标公式,错误的是()。A:普通股每股净收益=(净利润-优
Thechangeinthatvillagewasmiraculou
在对估值机构、地产经纪和律师事务所等合作机构的选择上,银行应把握的总体原则有(
下列预算中,不直接涉及现金收支的是()。A.销售预算 B.产品成本预算 C.
最新回复
(
0
)