首页
登录
职称英语
One of the most difficult situations that a researcher can encounter is to s
One of the most difficult situations that a researcher can encounter is to s
游客
2025-04-25
0
管理
问题
One of the most difficult situations that a researcher can encounter is to see or suspect that a colleague has violated the ethical standards of the research community. It is easy to find excuses to do nothing, but someone who has witnessed misconduct has an unmistakable obligation to act. At the most immediate level, misconduct can seriously obstruct or damage one’s own research or the research of colleagues. 1)
More broadly, even a single case of misconduct can malign scientists and their institutions, which in turn can result in the imposition of counterproductive regulations, and shake public confidence in the integrity of science.
To be sure, raising a concern about unethical conduct is rarely an easy thing to do. In some cases, anonymity is possible—but not always. Reprisals by the accused person and by skeptical colleagues have occurred in the past and have had serious consequences. 2)
Any allegation of misconduct is a very important charge that needs to be taken seriously. If mishandled, an allegation can gravely damage the person charged, the one who makes the charge, the institutions involved, and science in general.
Someone who is confronting a problem involving research ethics usually has more options than are immediately apparent. In most cases the best thing to do is to discuss the situation with a trusted friend or advisor. 3)
In universities, faculty advisors, department chairs, and other senior faculty call be invaluable sources of advice in deciding whether to go forward with a complaint.
An important consideration is deciding when to put a complaint in writing. Once in writing, universities are obligated to deal with a complaint in a more formal manner than if it is made verbally. 4)
Putting a complaint in writing can have serious consequences for the career of a scientist and should be undertaken only after thorough consideration.
The National Science Foundation and Public Health Service require all research institutions that receive public funds to have procedures in place to deal with allegations of unethical practice. 5)
These procedures take into account fairness for the accused, protection for the accuser, coordination with funding agencies, and requirements for confidentiality and disclosure.
In addition, many universities and other research institutions have designated an ombudsman, ethics officer, or other official who is available to discuss situations involving research ethics. Such discussions are carried out in the strictest confidence whenever possible. Some institutions provide multiple entry points, so that complainants can go to a person with whom they feel comfortable. [br]
选项
答案
任何对失德行为的指控都非常重要,需要认真对待。如果处理不好,这一指控会使被指控人、指控人、相关机构及科学本身受到严重的伤害。
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/4052866.html
相关试题推荐
Whatarethechancesthatwewillencountersomealienformoflife,asweex
Whatarethechancesthatwewillencountersomealienformoflife,asweex
Itusedtobesostraightforward.Ateamofresearchersworkingtogetherin
Itusedtobesostraightforward.Ateamofresearchersworkingtogetherin
Itusedtobesostraightforward.Ateamofresearchersworkingtogetherin
Itusedtobesostraightforward.Ateamofresearchersworkingtogetherin
Theroleofgovernmentinenvironmentalmanagementisdifficultbutinescapa
Theroleofgovernmentinenvironmentalmanagementisdifficultbutinescapa
Theroleofgovernmentinenvironmentalmanagementisdifficultbutinescapa
Theroleofgovernmentinenvironmentalmanagementisdifficultbutinescapa
随机试题
Ifyoucouldgoonvacationasanyoneyouwanted,whowouldyouchoose?Joel
[originaltext]Everydaydressisappropriateformostvisitstopeoples’hom
以挡土墙作为支挡构造物时,()多用于具有较完整岩石地段的路堑边坡支挡。A.
高分子防水卷材试样热老化处理试验程序,80℃±2℃的温度下恒温14d,标准环境调
慢性阻塞性肺疾病肺脾气虚证治疗宜首选A.补肺汤加减 B.小青龙汤加减 C.补
以下关于经济分析方法的发展趋势,表述正确的是()。A:在传统的观念中,经济分析
李杰是某社会服务机构的领导,在平时的工作中,他要求员工必须了解组织的工作方向和目
下列叙述正确的是A.白细胞均是有粒细胞 B.单核细胞为有粒细胞 C.淋巴细胞
共用题干 患者,女,18岁。右下颌膨隆畸形2年,无疼痛。如果检查见右下颌骨膨隆
作为低压电动机的保护电器,主回路低压断路器过电流脱扣器的选择应符合().A.
最新回复
(
0
)