首页
登录
职称英语
There is one last question I must deal with in this chapter. Why should huma
There is one last question I must deal with in this chapter. Why should huma
游客
2025-04-19
40
管理
问题
There is one last question I must deal with in this chapter. Why should human beings be moral? Another way of putting the problem is as follows; Is there any clear foundation or basis for morality? Can any reasons be found for human beings to be good and do right acts rather than be bad and do wrong acts?
I have already pointed out the difficulties involved in founding morality on religion, and especially on religion as a safe factor.(1)
However, if a person has religious faith, then he or she does have a foundation for a personal morality, even though this foundation is basically psychological rather than logical in nature. What disturbs me about the use of religion as the foundation of morality is the frequently-made assumption that if there is no supernatural or religious basis for morality, then there can be no basis at all.
A related, and perhaps deeper, statement is that there can be no real meaning to human life: unless there is some sort of afterlife or some other extra-natural reason for living.(2)
It is obvious that for many individuals this is psychologically true; that is, they feel that their existence has meaning and purpose and that they have a reason for being moral if and only if there is a God, an afterlife, or some sort of religion in their lives.
I feel that we must respect this point of view and accept the conviction of the many people who hold it, because that is how they feel about life and morality.
It is also obvious, however, that many people do not feel this way.(3)
I think it is terribly presumptuous of religious believers to feel that if some people do not have a religious commitment, their lives are meaningless, or that such people have no reason for being moral in their actions.
But if religion does not necessarily provide a "why" for morality, then what does? Let us assume for a moment that there is no supernatural morality and see if we can find any other reasons why people should be moral.
Enlightened Self-interest
One can certainly argue on a basis of enlightened self-interest, that it is, at the very least, generally better to be good rather than bad and to create a world and society that is good rather than one that is bad. As a matter of fact, self-interest is the sole basis of one ethical theory, ethical egoism. I am not, however, suggesting at this point that one ought to pursue one’s own self-interest. I am merely presenting the argument that if everyone tried to do and be good and to avoid and prevent bad, it would be in everyone’s self-interest. For example, if within a group of people no one killed, stole, lied, or cheated, then each member of the group would benefit.(4)
An individual member of the group could say, "It’s in my self-interest to do good rather than bad because I stand to benefit if I do and also because I could be ostracized or punished if I don’t. " Therefore, even though it is not airtight, the argument from enlightened self-interest is a somewhat compelling one.
Argument from Tradition and Law
Related to the foregoing argument is the argument from tradition and law. This argument suggests that because traditions and laws, established over a long period of time, govern the behavior of human beings and because these traditions and laws urge human beings to be moral rather than immoral, there are good reasons for being so.(5)
Self-interest is one reason, but another is respect for the human thought and effort that has gone into establishing such laws and traditions and transferring them from one historic period and one culture to another. This can be an attractive argument, even though it tends to suppress questioning of traditions and laws—a kind of questioning that is, I feel, the very touchstone of creative moral reasoning.
It is interesting to note that most of us probably learned morality through being confronted with this argument, the religious argument, and the experiences surrounding them. Don’t we all remember being told we should or should not do something because it was or was not in our own self-interest, because God said it was right or wrong, or because it was the way we were supposed to act in our family, school, society, and world? [br] (5)
选项
答案
自利观是原因之一,但另一个原因是对人类的思想和努力的尊重。正是这些思想和努力使法律和传统得以形成,并从某个历史时期、某种文化传承到另一个历史时期和另一种文化。这个观点具有吸引力,尽管它倾向于压制人们对传统和法律提出质疑——这种质疑,我认为,是对创造性道德的理性思考的试金石。
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/4043770.html
相关试题推荐
She’scute,noquestion.Symmetricalfeatures,flawlessskin,lookstobe22
She’scute,noquestion.Symmetricalfeatures,flawlessskin,lookstobe22
She’scute,noquestion.Symmetricalfeatures,flawlessskin,lookstobe22
She’scute,noquestion.Symmetricalfeatures,flawlessskin,lookstobe22
Whetherworkshouldbeplacedamongthecausesofhappinessoramongthecau
Whetherworkshouldbeplacedamongthecausesofhappinessoramongthecau
Youshouldspendnomorethan20minutesonthistask.Youandyourfami
Ratherthanallowingthegovernmenttocontrolinvestments,truepower,shouldb
Shouldwecareifover150knownspeciesofanimalshave【1】fromtheearthin
Shouldwecareifover150knownspeciesofanimalshave【1】fromtheearthin
随机试题
[originaltext]Interviewer:GoodmorningMr.Pitt.Dositdown.Firstofall,Mr
Usually,therearetworeasonstopursuescientificknowledge:forthesake
[originaltext]W:Hello.CanItakeyourorder?M:Yes.I’dlikealargepeppero
膀胱癌的组织学类型可以是()。A.腺癌 B.鳞癌 C.移行细胞癌 D.
下列有关冠心病危险因素的说法不正确的是A.危险因素是指个体固有的生理、心理因素或
下列项目中,不能够确认为无形资产的是()。A.通过购买方式取得的土地使用权
银行承兑汇票的承兑银行,应当按照票面金额向出票人收取()的手续费。A:千分之一
某固定节拍流水施工,基础工程划分4个施工过程(挖基槽、作垫层、混凝土浇筑、回填土
16岁女孩,左小腿上段肿胀疼痛半年,近1个月来肿胀明显,夜间痛明显.查体:左胫骨
根据《标准化法》,下列标准中,不能制定为强制性标准的有()。2018真题A、行业
最新回复
(
0
)