首页
登录
职称英语
There is one last question I must deal with in this chapter. Why should huma
There is one last question I must deal with in this chapter. Why should huma
游客
2025-04-19
26
管理
问题
There is one last question I must deal with in this chapter. Why should human beings be moral? Another way of putting the problem is as follows; Is there any clear foundation or basis for morality? Can any reasons be found for human beings to be good and do right acts rather than be bad and do wrong acts?
I have already pointed out the difficulties involved in founding morality on religion, and especially on religion as a safe factor.(1)
However, if a person has religious faith, then he or she does have a foundation for a personal morality, even though this foundation is basically psychological rather than logical in nature. What disturbs me about the use of religion as the foundation of morality is the frequently-made assumption that if there is no supernatural or religious basis for morality, then there can be no basis at all.
A related, and perhaps deeper, statement is that there can be no real meaning to human life: unless there is some sort of afterlife or some other extra-natural reason for living.(2)
It is obvious that for many individuals this is psychologically true; that is, they feel that their existence has meaning and purpose and that they have a reason for being moral if and only if there is a God, an afterlife, or some sort of religion in their lives.
I feel that we must respect this point of view and accept the conviction of the many people who hold it, because that is how they feel about life and morality.
It is also obvious, however, that many people do not feel this way.(3)
I think it is terribly presumptuous of religious believers to feel that if some people do not have a religious commitment, their lives are meaningless, or that such people have no reason for being moral in their actions.
But if religion does not necessarily provide a "why" for morality, then what does? Let us assume for a moment that there is no supernatural morality and see if we can find any other reasons why people should be moral.
Enlightened Self-interest
One can certainly argue on a basis of enlightened self-interest, that it is, at the very least, generally better to be good rather than bad and to create a world and society that is good rather than one that is bad. As a matter of fact, self-interest is the sole basis of one ethical theory, ethical egoism. I am not, however, suggesting at this point that one ought to pursue one’s own self-interest. I am merely presenting the argument that if everyone tried to do and be good and to avoid and prevent bad, it would be in everyone’s self-interest. For example, if within a group of people no one killed, stole, lied, or cheated, then each member of the group would benefit.(4)
An individual member of the group could say, "It’s in my self-interest to do good rather than bad because I stand to benefit if I do and also because I could be ostracized or punished if I don’t. " Therefore, even though it is not airtight, the argument from enlightened self-interest is a somewhat compelling one.
Argument from Tradition and Law
Related to the foregoing argument is the argument from tradition and law. This argument suggests that because traditions and laws, established over a long period of time, govern the behavior of human beings and because these traditions and laws urge human beings to be moral rather than immoral, there are good reasons for being so.(5)
Self-interest is one reason, but another is respect for the human thought and effort that has gone into establishing such laws and traditions and transferring them from one historic period and one culture to another. This can be an attractive argument, even though it tends to suppress questioning of traditions and laws—a kind of questioning that is, I feel, the very touchstone of creative moral reasoning.
It is interesting to note that most of us probably learned morality through being confronted with this argument, the religious argument, and the experiences surrounding them. Don’t we all remember being told we should or should not do something because it was or was not in our own self-interest, because God said it was right or wrong, or because it was the way we were supposed to act in our family, school, society, and world? [br] (2)
选项
答案
很明显,对于很多人而言,这种说法从心理方面来看是正确的。也就是说,如果或者说只有在他们的生活中有上帝、来世或某种宗教的存在,他们才会觉得自己的存在具有意义和目的,也因此他们才有恪守道德的理由。
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/4043767.html
相关试题推荐
Thewealthofacountryshouldbemeasured________thehealthandhappinessofit
Youshouldspendabout20minutesonthistask.Yourentahousethrough
Thegreatquestionthatthispaperwill,butfeebly,attempttoansweris,W
Thegreatquestionthatthispaperwill,butfeebly,attempttoansweris,W
Thegreatquestionthatthispaperwill,butfeebly,attempttoansweris,W
21.Everytimeyoutrytoansweraquestionthataskswhy,youengageinthe
21.Everytimeyoutrytoansweraquestionthataskswhy,youengageinthe
21.Everytimeyoutrytoansweraquestionthataskswhy,youengageinthe
WhatshouldwecallthepersonwhomakesresearchintoCognitiveBehavior[br]W
WhatshouldwecallthepersonwhomakesresearchintoCognitiveBehavior[br]T
随机试题
【B1】[br]【B5】[originaltext]Tobesuccessfulinajobinterview,youshould
[originaltext]Milkwasabasicfoodofmanlongbeforehistorywaswritten.
Alargepartofeffectiveleadershipisdependentonsomethingcalled"styl
当单元工程达不到合格标准时,应及时处理,下列关于处理后的质量等级确定说法,正确的
下列选项中的工作性质属于离心工作的是()。A.三角肌和冈上肌使肩关节外展的工作
()就是要训练学生对他们所阅读的东西产生一个类比或表象,以加强其深层理
案例: 下面是某化学教师关于“分子”的教学片段 环节一:情境创设,引入新课。
下列各项中,不符合内部牵制的要求的是()。A、出纳人员管票据 B、出纳人员
在建设项目中,项目投资完成后所进行的评价是()。A:项目中间评价 B:项目事
A.可处1000~5万元的罚款 B.可处3万元以下的罚款 C.可处2万元以下
最新回复
(
0
)