首页
登录
职称英语
The 100 Aker Wood may look like a dark, forbidding place these days for Mich
The 100 Aker Wood may look like a dark, forbidding place these days for Mich
游客
2025-04-18
12
管理
问题
The 100 Aker Wood may look like a dark, forbidding place these days for Michael D. Eisner. That’s where Winnie the Pooh, Piglet, and Eeyore live, and the cartoon characters—which represent at least $ 1 billion a year in revenues for Eisner’s Walt Disney Co. —are in full revolt. A 12-years-old lawsuit, sealed in a Los Angeles court until January, has come to light, and a series of court rulings threaten the media giant with hundreds of millions in overdue license payments and possibly the loss of one of its most lucrative properties.
How large a hit Disney will take is still in dispute. Disney is appealing two rulings, including one alleging that company executives knowingly destroyed important papers related to its licensing deals. The Pooh affair may seem minor at a time when Eisner is under attack for Disney’s chronically weak stock price and ABC’s anemic ratings, but the Disney chairman hardly needs more jostling from a Silly Old Bear. What’s more, the impact could be significant. After acknowledging to the Securities & Exchange Commission on Aug. 9 that "damages could total as much as several hundred million dollars" or the loss of the licensing agreement, Disney was hit with new shareholder lawsuits.
Disney wants to keep its grip on that bear and his honey jar. Pooh is Disney’s single largest property, says Martin Brockstein executive editor of The Licensing Letter. That adds up to about $ 100 million in operating earnings from royalties on Pooh T-shirts, backpacks, and other merchandise, figures Gerard Klauer Matheson & Co. analyst Jeffrey Logsdon. Last year, Disney paid $ 352 million to one pair of heirs of Winnie-the-Pooh author A. A. Milne. But the family of Stephen A. Slesinger, a New York literary agent who bought the U. S. rights in 1930, says Disney owes them $ 200 million on licenses for T-shirts and other merchandise and has cut them entirely out of the lucrative videocassette and DVD arena. Headed by Shirley Slesinger Lasswell, an 80-year-old widow who travels with a Winnie-the-Pooh bear everywhere, the family contends it is owed close to $ 1 billion, say its lawyers. Disney, which says it pays the Slesingers $ 12 million a year, insists the $ 1 billion figure is a publicity stunt. "The 1930 contract says they get royalties on merchandise alone, not all exploitation," says Disney attorney Daniel J. Petrocelli.
The Slesingers also charge that Disney lost documents related to merchandise sales and destroyed others that extended the accord to DVDs and videotapes. On June 18, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Ernest M. Hiroshige rejected the audit by a forensic accountant he thought unduly favored Disney and found that Disney "misused the discovery process" by hiding the fact that it destroyed documents that might have expanded the licensing agreement to tapes and DVDs.
Absent those documents—which include the papers of the late Disney Consumer Products chief Vincent Jefferds—the case may hinge on the "mommy memo. " That memo, written in 1983 by Slesinger daughter Patricia to her mother, Shirley, describes a meeting with Jefferds at the Beverly Hills Hotel at which Jefferds allegedly told Patricia "that videos and all these new things were covered and to shut up about it," according to court documents. Because Disney destroyed Jefferds’ letters, Judge Hiroshige ruled that Disney is barred from "introducing evidence disputing" the family’s contention that they were entitled to royalties on videocassettes. Disney is appealing the ruling.
Settlement seems unlikely among the parties. One obstacle; the still-simmering animosity toward Slesinger lawyer Bertram Fields, who won a $250 million settlement for former Disney studio chief Jeffrey Katzenberg in a hyper-charged 1999 case. This time, the character may be soft and fuzzy, but the payout could be bigger. For Eisner, Pooh is becoming one Very Big Bother. [br] The expression "in full revolt" in the sentence "That’s where Winnie the Pooh, Piglet, and Eeyore live, and the cartoon characters..., are in full revolt. "(Para. 1)implies that______.
选项
A、the cartoon characters are no longer popular
B、Disney is seriously involved in lawsuits
C、they show the sign of defeat of Disney in lawsuits
D、the cartoon characters no longer play positive roles
答案
B
解析
本题考查细节推断能力。根据第一段第二句话“That’s where Winnie thePooh,Piglet,and Eeyore live,and the cartoon characters--which represent at least$1billion a year in revenues for Eisner’s Walt Disney Co.一are in full revolt.”可知,在那里,维尼熊、小猪皮杰、小驴屹耳和其他卡通人物——每年为艾斯纳的迪斯尼公司赚取10亿美金——在那儿造反了。可推知,有人对迪斯尼公司提出诉讼,才导致它们造反。由此可知,B项符合题意。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/4043625.html
相关试题推荐
Marywasashywomanandtook______behindaratherforbiddingbluntnessofmanne
The100AkerWoodmaylooklikeadark,forbiddingplacethesedaysforMich
The100AkerWoodmaylooklikeadark,forbiddingplacethesedaysforMich
The100AkerWoodmaylooklikeadark,forbiddingplacethesedaysforMich
The100AkerWoodmaylooklikeadark,forbiddingplacethesedaysforMich
The100AkerWoodmaylooklikeadark,forbiddingplacethesedaysforMich
The100AkerWoodmaylooklikeadark,forbiddingplacethesedaysforMicha
The100AkerWoodmaylooklikeadark,forbiddingplacethesedaysforMicha
The100AkerWoodmaylooklikeadark,forbiddingplacethesedaysforMicha
The100AkerWoodmaylooklikeadark,forbiddingplacethesedaysforMicha
随机试题
WhatisthecharacteristicoftheEnvironmentalCharterHighSchool?[originalte
Canyourememberwhatyouateyesterday?Ifasked,mostpeoplewillbeable
《亚威农少女》、《格尔尼卡》是__________绘画的代表作品。(??)A.印
()标准提出了运行维护服务能力模型。A.《信息技术服务运行维护第1部分:通
开办药品经营企业必须具备以下条件:A.具有依法经过资格认定的药学技术人员 B.
材料一中亚地区是古代丝绸之路必经之地,商业贸易活动频繁。中亚油气资源丰富,每年有
下边四个图形中,只有一个是由左边的四个图形拼合(只能通过上、下、左、右平移)而成
一海船装运煤炭20000吨至某港卸载,其中8000吨直接换装上河船运走,4500
我国刑法规定,行为虽然在客观上造成了损害结果,但不是出于故意或者过失,是由于不能
设计施工总承包合同模式下,总监理工程师可以授权其他监理人员负责执行其指派的一项或
最新回复
(
0
)