首页
登录
职称英语
Our present generation of cultural critics, arriving after the assault of po
Our present generation of cultural critics, arriving after the assault of po
游客
2025-04-08
4
管理
问题
Our present generation of cultural critics, arriving after the assault of postmodernism and the increasingly widespread commercialization of culture, has been cast adrift, without any firm basis for judgments. Publications and institutions to support serious criticism, in this view, either no longer exist or are few in number.
Critics today, it is also claimed, are too cozy behind the ivied walls of academe, content to employ a prose style that is decipherable only to a handful of the cognoscenti. The deadly dive of University critics into the shallow depths of popular culture, moreover, reveals the unwillingness of these critics to uphold standards. Even if the reasons offered are contradictory, these Jeremiahs huddle around their sad conclusion that serious cultural criticism has fallen into a morass of petty bickering and bloated reputations.
Such narratives of declension, a staple of American intellectual life since the time of the Puritans, are misplaced, self-serving, and historically inaccurate, so difficult to prove. Has the level of criticism declined in the last 50 years? Of course the logic of such an opinion depends on the figures that are being contrasted with one another. Any number of cultural critics thriving today could be invoked to demonstrate that cultural criticism is alive and well.
But many new and thriving venues for criticism and debate exist today, and they are not limited solely to the discussion of literary works. Actually, they became so entrusted with their own certitude and political judgments that they became largely irrelevant. Today the complaint is that literary culture lacks civility. We live in an age of commercialism and spectacle. Writers seek the limelight, and one way to bask in it is to publish reviews that scorch the landscape, with Dale Peck as the famous, but not atypical, case in point. Heidi Julavits, in an essay in The Believer, lamented the downfall of serious fiction and reviewing. She surveyed a literary culture that had embraced "snark" , her term for hostile, self-serving reviews.
The snark review, according to Julavits, eschews a serious engagement with literature in favor of a sound-bite approach, an attempt to turn the review into a form of entertainment akin to film reviews or restaurant critiques. A critic found cultural criticism to be in "critical condition." For him, the postmodern turn to theory, in its questioning of objectivity, cut the critical, independent ground out from under reviewers. The rise of chain bookstores and blockbuster best sellers demeaned literary culture, making it prey to the commercial values of the market and entertainment.
The criticism does not seem discontinuous. Nor should we forget that civility rarely reigned in the circles of New York intellectuals. The art critic Clement Greenberg physically pummeled the theater critic Lionel Abel after Abel rejected the view that Jean Wahl, the French philosopher, was anti-Semitic. Though Robert Peck has the reputation of a literary hatchet man, so far as I know his blows thus far have all been confined to the printed page.
Cultural criticism has certainly changed over the years. The old days of the critic who wielded unchallenged authority have happily passed. Ours is a more pluralistic age, one not beholden to a narrow literary culture. The democratization of criticism — as in the Amazon system of readers’ evaluating books — is a messy affair, as democracy must be. But the solution to the problems of criticism in the present is best not discovered in the musty basements of nostalgia and sentiment for the cultural criticism of a half-century gone. Rather the solution is to recognize, as John Dewey did almost a century ago, that the problems of democracy demand more democracy, less nostalgia for a golden age that never was, and a spirit of openness to what is new and invigorating in our culture. [br] What is the author’s opinion of the current complaint about the literary expansion into the other fields?
选项
A、When literary critics discuss issues with political judgments, their views are likely to be meaningless.
B、It is reasonable for writers to seek limelight since we are living in the age of commercialism.
C、Critics should be encouraged to write and publish poignant articles which would scorch the landscape.
D、It is the critics’ responsibility to lament the downfall of serious fiction and reviewing.
答案
A
解析
细节推理题。对于文学评论涉及政治等别的领域,作者对此的态度体现在第四段。第四段第二句中的largely irrelevant与选项A对应,作者认为他们在很大程度上不相关,也就是说他们的评论很可能没有意义。其他几项都不是作者本人的观点,故排除。故答案为A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/4031541.html
相关试题推荐
Americanculturehasnotbeenimmunetoculturalinfluencesfromoutside.Th
Americanculturehasnotbeenimmunetoculturalinfluencesfromoutside.Th
Americanculturehasnotbeenimmunetoculturalinfluencesfromoutside.Th
Americanculturehasnotbeenimmunetoculturalinfluencesfromoutside.Th
Therepresentativepresentedtothecommitteea______signedby1,200electorsa
Allrepresentativesinsistedthattheproblemsrequiringimmediatesolutionbeg
China’s______culturalheritageshouldbebetterprotectedthroughincreasedeff
Ourpresentgenerationofculturalcritics,arrivingaftertheassaultofpo
Ourpresentgenerationofculturalcritics,arrivingaftertheassaultofpo
Changesinartandculturalhistoryhaveneverbeeneasytoassimilatetopo
随机试题
Weareinaglobalhealthcrisis,anditgrowsworsebytheyear,astheWorl
()大提琴()小提琴[br]()吉他()锣D、J
Sincewritinghometotheirparentsformoney,theyhadlived______hope.A、inB、f
下列关于《寡人之于国也》的表述,正确的一项是()A.“王好战,请以战喻”,侧面
兴奋性突触后电位是由于突触后膜出现了超级化。()
队列研究的类型包括()。A.前瞻性队列研究 B.混合型队列研究 C.
承担中医药专家学术经验和技术专长继承工作的指导老师应当具备的条件是( )。A.
假设某地森林资源的增长速度是一定的,且不受到自然灾害等影响,那么若每年开采110
临床上轻型库欣病,MRI检查无明确垂体腺瘤的病人,可先采用的治疗方法是A.口服
某商业银行2014年的流动性资产余额为80亿,要想符合我国对商业银行流动性监管指
最新回复
(
0
)