首页
登录
职称英语
Just how much does the Constitution protect your digital data? The Supreme C
Just how much does the Constitution protect your digital data? The Supreme C
游客
2025-04-05
14
管理
问题
Just how much does the Constitution protect your digital data? The Supreme Court will now consider whether police can search the contents of a mobile phone without a warrant if the phone is on or around a person during an arrest.
California has asked the justices to refrain from a sweeping ruling particularly one that upsets the old assumption that authorities may search through the possessions of suspects at the time of their arrest. It is hard, the state argues, for judges to assess the implications of new and rapidly changing technologies.
The court would be recklessly modest if it followed California’s advice. Enough of the implications are discernable, even obvious, so that the justices can and should provide updated guidelines to police, lawyers and defendants.
They should start by discarding California’s lame argument that exploring the contents of a smart phone — a vast storehouse of digital information — is similar to, say, rifling through a suspect’s purse. The court has ruled that police don’t violate the Fourth Amendment when they sift through the wallet or pocketbook of an arrestee without a warrant. But exploring one’s smart phone is more like entering his or her home. A smart phone may contain an arrestee’s reading history, financial history, medical history and comprehensive records of recent correspondence. The development of "cloud computing," meanwhile, has made that exploration so much the easier.
Americans should take steps to protect their digital privacy. But keeping sensitive information on these devices is increasingly a requirement of normal life. Citizens still have a right to expect private documents to remain private and protected by the Constitution’s prohibition on unreasonable searches.
As so often is the case, stating that principle doesn’t ease the challenge of line-drawing. In many cases, it would not be overly onerous for authorities to obtain a warrant to search through phone contents. They could still invalidate Fourth Amendment protections when facing severe, urgent circumstances, and they could take reasonable measures to ensure that phone data are not erased or altered while a warrant is pending. The court, though, may want to allow room for police to cite situations where they are entitled to more freedom.
But the justices should not swallow California’s argument whole. New, disruptive technology sometimes demands novel applications of the Constitution’s protections. Orin Kerr, a law professor, compares the explosion and accessibility of digital information in the 21st century with the establishment of automobile use as a virtual necessity of life in the 20th: The justices had to specify novel rules for the new personal domain of the passenger car then; they must sort out how the Fourth Amendment applies to digital information now. [br] In Paragraph 5 and 6, the author shows his concern that______.
选项
A、principles are hard to be clearly expressed
B、the court is giving police less room for action
C、citizens’ privacy is not effectively protected
D、phones are used to store sensitive information
答案
C
解析
此题要在理解第五段之后进行推断,第五段第句话中说到“Americans should take steps to protect their digital privacy”,即应该逐步保护数据隐私是作者重点指出的问题。作者在第五、六段开始就直接指出来他所关注的问题,所以,“citizens’privacy is not effectively protected”的意思切合题意,因此选择C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/4028282.html
相关试题推荐
JusthowmuchdoestheConstitutionprotectyourdigitaldata?TheSupremeC
JusthowmuchdoestheConstitutionprotectyourdigitaldata?TheSupremeC
JusthowmuchdoestheConstitutionprotectyourdigitaldata?TheSupremeC
Agreatdealofattentionisbeingpaidtodaytotheso-calleddigitaldivid
Agreatdealofattentionisbeingpaidtodaytotheso-calleddigitaldivid
Agreatdealofattentionisbeingpaidtodaytotheso-calleddigitaldivid
Agreatdealofattentionisbeingpaidtodaytotheso-calleddigitaldivid
Agreatdealofattentionisbeingpaidtodaytotheso-calleddigitaldivid
Thepurchaserofthislorryisprotectedbythemanufacturer’swarrantythathe
Alltheworkersinthefactoryare______withprotectivehats.A、providedB、grant
随机试题
Whatistheimprovementofeachmainpointofinterestinthearea?ChooseFIVE
Parentswhobuythewatchmaydiscoverthatitisonethingforkidstotelltim
(1)IwassurethatIhadfoundatlasttheonetruecosmopolitesinceAdam,
[originaltext]Mathewlivedinabigcity,andalwayshadhishaircutbythe
B令x=rcosθ,y=rsinθ,由x>0,可得:-π/2<θ<π/2,0<r<1,则有:
2×15年1月1日,A公司为其200名中层以上职员每人授予100份现金股票增值权
属于持续整理形态的有( )。 Ⅰ.喇叭形形态 Ⅱ.楔形形态 Ⅲ.Ⅴ形形态
最早采用大都市区概念的国家是(),1980年后改称为大都市统计区。A.英国
社区矫正是让5种罪犯(管制、缓刑、假释、监外执行、剥夺政治权利)在社区里完成余刑
下列有关施工定额的说法中,正确的有( )。A.施工定额属于企业定额的性质,可用于
最新回复
(
0
)