首页
登录
职称英语
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric p
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric p
游客
2025-04-03
24
管理
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate—or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence " suggests a casual link" between extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields—those having very longwave-lengths—and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer. While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as " a possible, but not proven, cause of cancer in humans. "
The report is no reason to panic—or even to lost sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the Bush Administration, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects. For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field. The electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilovolts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is for from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that(electromagnetic fields)present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report. " Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane. [br] It can be inferred from physical phenomenon______.
选项
A、the force of the electromagnetic field is too weak to be harmful
B、the force of the electromagnetic field is weaker than the electric field that the cells generate
C、electromagnetic field may affect health
D、only more powerful radiation can knock electron out of human body
答案
A
解析
由文章第四段第二,三句可知,当电流通过电缆,产生磁场,对周围物体产生(影响)力。许多年来,科学家把任何有关“这些力可能有害的想法”置于一边(不予考虑),主要是因为它们(所产生的力)非常弱。因此是磁场力太弱不会产生有害作用。故选A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/4024230.html
相关试题推荐
OfcourseI’mnot______toassociatingwithsocietypeoplelikeyou.A、accustome
Thesteamcan______electricitybyturninganelectricgenerator.A、causeB、grow
The______ofelectricalenergyintothermalenergyisaprocessthatiseasilyc
Concernedpeoplewantto______theriskofdevelopingcancer.(2002年春季上海交通大学考博试题)
Someteenagersharborageneralizedresentmentagainstsociety,which______the
Whenasocietyispolarized,the______LeftconfrontstheextremeRightandthe
Thesupplyofelectricpowertothecityanditsneighboringdistrictshashadt
Languagehasalwaysbeen—asthephrasegoes—themirrortosociety.Englishis
ThebasicaimofthisInstitutionisthe______ofcancer.A、treatmentB、fightC、c
______muchhasbeenknownaboutmammarycancer,theprecisewaytocureofitst
随机试题
Oneofthemostextensiverecentstudiesoffamilyviolence,conductedbyth
ThepresidentoftheUnitedStateshasoneofthetoughestjobsintheworld
WhyWomenAreSuchBadNetworkersThechampagneisnotworki
下列说法符合《关于做好企业信用信息尽职调查工作的通知》相关要求的有( )A.保
下列药物不属于木香槟榔丸处方中的药的是A.木香B.槟榔C.枳壳D.陈皮E.天仙子
护理甲亢危象患者高热时,应禁用A.异丙嗪 B.酒精擦浴 C.温水擦浴 D.
按照政府补助准则的规定,与企业日常活动相关的政府补助,应当按照经济业务实质,计入
关于辞退福利的表述中正确的有()。A.辞退福利包括在职工劳动合同尚未到期前,不
根据《中华人民共和国土壤污染防治法》,关于有土壤污染风险的建设用地地块变更为住宅
使有害物随生产过程或设备本身产生或诱导的气流直接进入罩内的局部排风罩为()
最新回复
(
0
)