Since 1975 advocates of humane treatment of animals have broadened their goa

游客2025-03-27 16

问题 Since 1975 advocates of humane treatment of animals have broadened their goals to oppose the use of animals for fur, leather, wool, and food. They have mounted protests against all forms of hunting and the trapping of animals in the wild. And they have joined environmentalists in urging protection of natural habitats from commercial or residential development. The occasion for these added emphases was the publication in 1975 of "Animal Liberation: A New Ethics for Our Treatment of Animals" by Peter Singer, formerly a professor of philosophy at Oxford University in England.
This book gave a new impetus to the animal rights movement. The post-1975 animal rights activists are far more vocal than their predecessors, and the organizations to which they belong are generally more radical. Many new organizations are formed. The tactics of the activists are designed to catch the attention of the public. Since the mid-1980s there have been frequent news reports about animal right organizations picketing stores that sell furs, harassing hunters in the wild, or breaking into laboratories to free animals. Some of the more extreme organizations advocate the use of assault, armed terrorism, and death threats to make their point. Aside from making isolated attacks on people who wear fur coats or trying to prevent hunters from killing animals, most of the organizations have directed their tactics at institutions. The results of the protests and other tactics have been mixed. Companies are reducing reliance on animal testing. Medical research has been somewhat curtailed by legal restrictions and the reluctance of younger workers to use animals in research. New tests have been developed to replace the use of animals. Some well-known designers have stopped using fur. While the general public tends to agree that animals should be treated humanely, most people are unlikely to give up eating meat or wearing goods made from leather and wool. Giving up genuine fur has become less of a problem since fibers used to make fake fur such as the Japanese invention Kanecaron can look almost identical to real fur. Some of the strongest opposition to the animal rights movement has come from hunters and their organizations. But animal rights activists have succeeded in marshaling public opinion to press for State restrictions on hunting in several parts of the nation. [br] It seems that the author of this article

选项 A、is strongly opposed to the animal rights movement
B、is in favor of the animal rights movement
C、supports the use of violence in animal protection
D、hates the use of fake fur for clothes

答案 B

解析综合分析题。从全文可以看出作者支持the animal rights movement，所以选B；作者并没有表现出支持violence in animal protection，也没有说憎恨the use of fake fur for clothes, 所以C，D错误；A则更不符合全文的观点。

转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/4015153.html

相关试题推荐

随机试题

最新回复(0)

Since 1975 advocates of humane treatment of animals have broadened their goa

Thispeer-reviewedjournalhasaspecificemphasisoneffectivetreatmentofacu

Humansarebeginningtorealizethatraisingfoodanimalscontributessubstantia

Nowadays,ourgovernmentadvocatescredittowhateverwedoorwhoeverwecontac