2. 职称英语
  3. To compare the lighting-fast genius of playwright Tom Stoppard with the pedestri

To compare the lighting-fast genius of playwright Tom Stoppard with the pedestri

游客2025-02-25  0
问题 To compare the lighting-fast genius of playwright Tom Stoppard with the pedestrian efforts of some of his contemporaries is to compare the exquisite bouquet of a fine wine with that of ordinary grape juice.
选项 A、To compare the lighting-fast genius of playwright Tom Stoppard with the pedestrian efforts of some of his contemporaries is to compare the exquisite bouquet of a fine wine with that of ordinary grape juice.
B、To compare the lighting-fast genius of playwright Tom Stoppard with the pedestrian efforts of some of his contemporaries is comparing the exquisite bouquet of a fine wine with that of ordinary grape juice.
C、Comparing the lighting-fast genius of playwright Tom Stoppard with the pedestrian efforts of some of his contemporaries is to compare the exquisite bouquet of a fine wine with ordinary grape juice.
D、Comparing the lighting-fast genius of playwright Tom Stoppard with the pedestrian efforts of some of his contemporaries is like comparing the exquisite bouquet of a fine wine with ordinary grape juice.
E、To compare the lighting-fast genius of playwright Tom Stoppard with the pedestrian efforts of some of his contemporaries is to compare a fine wine’s bouquet with ordinary grape juice’s bouquet.
答案 A
解析 本题题干很长，全划线。不要慌，耐着性子，先把题干看一遍，发现它是属于动词不定式中提到的to do is to do的结构，只不过其中to do的内容较长而已。第一步抓住此条主线，不要去理会细节，仅看每个选项的大结构就可排除B、C。D暂不讨论。A、E均符合此结构；第二步对A、E进行细致分析，发现差异在于第二个to compare之后的内容：A中是theexquisite bouquet of a fine wine with that of ordinary grape juice；而E中是a fine wine’s bouquetwith ordinary grape juice’s bouquet。单独来看，两者都符合可比性原则，句意也是正确的。那么，怎么办呢?别着急，找参照物：往回看句首的第一个to compare后的比较物的形式。此处对比物均采用n．of n．的结构，由此再根据比较中所提到的尽可能对称原则，可断定A最优，E中的结构是n．’s n.，与A相比，形式上不佳。但不要慌着去“点”答案，再查看一下D(刚才未讨论)。有了上面的基础，很容易就会发现，第二个comparing之后的比较对象同样不具可比性(bouquet与orange juice)，从而可确认A为最终答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3972196.html
相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)