首页
登录
职称英语
Spot the differenceA Taxonomic history has been ma
Spot the differenceA Taxonomic history has been ma
游客
2025-02-18
9
管理
问题
Spot the difference
A Taxonomic history has been made this week, at least according to the World Wildlife Fund (WWF), a conservation group. Scientists have described a new species of clouded leopard from the tropical forests of Indonesia with spots (or "clouds", as they are poetically known) smaller than those of other clouded leopards, with fur a little darker and with a double, as opposed to a "partial double"—stripe down its back.
B However, no previously unknown beast has suddenly leapt out from the forest. Instead, some scientists have proposed a change In the official taxonomic accounting system of clouded leopards. Where there were four subspecies there will likely now be two species. A genetic analysis and a closer Inspection of museum specimens’ coats published in Current Biology has found no relevant difference between three subspecies described 50 years ago from continental Asia and from the Halnan and Taiwan islands. The 5000-11000 clouded leopards on Borneo, the 3000-7000 on Sumatra, and the remaining few on the nearby Batu Islands can now, the authors say, claim a more elevated distinction as a species.
C What this actually means is fuzzy and whether it is scientifically important is questionable. In any case, biologists do not agree what species and subspecies are. Creatures are given Latin first and second names (corresponding to a genus and species) according to the convention of Carl yon Llnné, who was born 300 years ago this May. But Linnaeus, as he Is more commonly known, thought of species as perfectly discrete units created by God. Darwinism has them as mutable things, generated gradually over time by natural selection. So delineating when enough variation has evolved to justify a new category is largely a matter of taste.
D Take ants and butterflies. Ant experts have recently been waging a war against all types of species subdivision. Lepidopterists, on the other hand, cling to the double barrel second names from their discipline’s 19th century tradition, and categorise many local subclasses within species found over wide areas. Thus it would be futile if one were so inclined—to attempt to compare the diversity of ant and butterfly populations.
E The traditional way around the problem is to call a species all members of a group that share the same gene pool. They can mate together and produce fertile offspring. Whether Indonesian clouded leopards can make cubs with continental ones remains unknown but seems probable. Instead, the claim this week is that genetics and slight differences In fur patterning are enough to justify re-branding the clouded leopard as two significant types. Genetically, that makes sense if many DNA variations correlate perfectly between members of the two groups. The authors did find some correlation, but they looked for it in only three Indonesian animals. A larger sample would have been more difficult.
F One thing Is abundantly clear: conservationists who are flying to stop the destruction of the leopards’ habitat in Borneo and Sumatra see the announcement of a new species of big cat as a means to gain publicity and political capital. Upgrading subspecies to species is a strategy which James Mallet, of University College London, likes to call species inflation. It is a common by-product of genetic analysis, which can reveal differences between populations that the eye cannot, Creating ever more detailed genetic categories means creating smaller and increasingly restricted populations of more species. The trouble is that risks devaluing the importance of the term species.
G The problem of redefining species by genetics is the creation of taxonomic confusion, a potentially serious difficulty for conservationists and others, Take for example the recent proposal to add the polar bear to the list of animals protected under America’s Endangered Species Act. That seems all well and good. However, study the genetics and it transpires that polar bears are closer to some brown bears, than some brown bears are to each other. Go by the genes and it seems that the polar bear would not count as a species in its own right (and thus might not enjoy the protection afforded to species) but should be labelled a sub-species of the brown bear. [br] *
选项
答案
F
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3961697.html
相关试题推荐
SpotthedifferenceATaxonomichistoryhasbeenma
SpotthedifferenceATaxonomichistoryhasbeenma
SpotthedifferenceATaxonomichistoryhasbeenma
SpotthedifferenceATaxonomichistoryhasbeenma
SpotthedifferenceATaxonomichistoryhasbeenma
ThepassageendsbynotingthatourviewofhistoryisbiasedbecauseA、wefailt
Comparedwithtoday’smuseums,thoseofthepastA、didnotpresenthistoryinad
TheHistoryoftheGuitarTheword’guitar’wasbroughtintoEnglishasanadapt
TheHistoryoftheGuitarTheword’guitar’wasbroughtintoEnglishasanadapt
TheHistoryoftheGuitarTheword’guitar’wasbroughtintoEnglishasanadapt
随机试题
TheEuropeanCourtofHumanRightsruledTuesdaythatAbuQatada,aradical
Thisbrandofmotorcycleis(economy)______offuel.economical
NationalpartiesintheUnited’Stateshavegenerallybeenweakinstructureand
为了履行自己在人力资源管理方面新承担的职责,扮演好诸多重要角色,组织的高层管理者
把实践证实的理论看成是永恒不变的绝对真理,并当成检验其他一切认识是否正确的标准,
根据预测,依托全球能源互联网,到2050年全球能源碳排放为2013年的()。A
“没有无义务的权利,也没有无权利的义务。”这表明()。A.公民的权利与义务相互
教师的角色属于()。 (A)成就角色(B)规定性角色 (C)表现型角色
祖父母、外祖父母属于第二顺序继承人,享有继承权,其继承方式不包括( )。A.法
企业持有交易性金融资产期间,对于被投资单位宣告发放的现金股利,应借记“交易性金融
最新回复
(
0
)