首页
登录
职称英语
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 1-13 which are based on Reading P
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 1-13 which are based on Reading P
游客
2025-02-15
7
管理
问题
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 1-13 which are based on Reading Passage 1 below.
Going Nowhere Fast
THIS is ludicrous! We can talk to people anywhere in the world or fly to meet them in a few hours. We can even send probes to other planets. But when it comes to getting around our cities, we depend on systems that have scarcely changed since the days of Gottlieb Daimler.
In recent years, the pollution belched out by millions of vehicles has dominated the debate about transport. The problem has even persuaded California—that home of car culture—to curb traffic growth. But no matter how green they become, cars are unlikely to get us around crowded cities any faster. And persuading people to use trains and buses will always be an uphill struggle. Cars, after all, are popular for very good reasons, as anyone with small children or heavy shopping knows.
So politicians should be trying to lure people out of their cars, not forcing them out. There’s certainly no shortage of alternatives. Perhaps the most attractive is the concept known as personal rapid transit(PRT), independently invented in the US and Europe in the 1950s.
The idea is to go to one of many stations and hop into a computer-controlled car which can whisk you to your destination along a network of guideways. You wouldn’t have to share your space with strangers, and with no traffic lights, pedestrians or parked cars to slow things down, PRT guideways can carry far more traffic, nonstop, than any inner city road.
It’s a wonderful vision, but the odds are stacked against PRT for a number of reasons. The first cars ran on existing roads, and it was only after they became popular—and after governments started earning revenue from them—that a road network designed specifically for motor vehicles was built. With PRT, the infrastructure would have to come first—and that would cost megabucks. What’s more, any transport system that threatened the car’s dominance would be up against all those with a stake in maintaining the status quo, from private car owners to manufacturers and oil multinationals. Even if PRTs were spectacularly successful in trials, it might not make much difference. Superior technology doesn’t always triumph, as the VHS versus Betamax and Windows versus Apple Mac battles showed.
But "dual-mode" systems might just succeed where PRT seems doomed to fail. The Danish RUF system envisaged by Palle Jensen, for example, resembles PRT but with one key difference: vehicles have wheels as well as a slot allowing them to travel on a monorail, so they can drive off the rail onto a normal road. Once on a road, the occupant would take over from the computer, and the RUF vehicle—the term comes from a Danish saying meaning to "go fast"—would become an electric car.
Build a fast network of guideways in a busy city centre and people would have a strong incentive not just to use public RUF vehicles, but also to buy their own dual-mode vehicle. Commuters could drive onto the guideway, sit back and read as they are chauffeured into the city. At work, they would jump out, leaving their vehicles to park themselves. Unlike PRT, such a system could grow organically, as each network would serve a large area around it and people nearby could buy into it. And a dual-mode system might even win the support of car manufacturers, who could easily switch to producing dual-mode vehicles.
Of course, creating a new transport system will not be cheap or easy. But unlike adding a dedicated bus lane here or extending the underground railway there, an innovative system such as Jensen’s could transform cities.
And it’s not just a matter of saving a few minutes a day. According to the Red Cross, more than 30 million people have died in road accidents in the past century—three times the number killed in the First World War—and the annual death toll is rising. And what’s more, the Red Cross believes road accidents will become the third biggest cause of death and disability by 2020, ahead of diseases such as AIDS and tuberculosis. Surely we can find a better way to get around?
Questions 1-6
Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage 1? In boxes 1-6 on your answer sheet, write
TRUE if the statement agrees with the information
FALSE if the statement contradicts the information
NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this [br] Private cars are much more convenient for those who tend to buy a lot of things during shopping.
选项
A、真
B、假
C、Not Given
答案
A
解析
利用细节词“shopping”定位于原文第二段最后一句话“Cars,after all,are popular forvery good reasons,as anyone with small children or heavy shopping knows”。意思也就是说对于有家庭和经常要采购大量东西的人来说,“private car”是必要且“convenient”的。题目信息与原文是同意表达,所以答案为True。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3958451.html
相关试题推荐
African-Americanfilmmakersshouldbeinanenviableposition,fors
African-Americanfilmmakersshouldbeinanenviableposition,fors
African-Americanfilmmakersshouldbeinanenviableposition,fors
Aftertwominutesinthesteamchamber,sweatbegantoflowin______fromeveryh
Afool,especiallyifhehasthemisfortuneofknowinganything,should______it
QUIBBLES:OBJECTIONS::A、questions:repliesB、foibles:flawsC、estimations:
MEETING:MINUTES::A、video:imageB、report:synopsisC、seism:quiverD、perfo
Directions:Eachofthefollowingreadingcomprehensionquestionsisbasedonth
Directions:Eachofthefollowingreadingcomprehensionquestionsisbasedonth
Sendingarobotintospacetogatherinformationisaviableoption,butshould
随机试题
患者,男,40岁。恶寒发热2天,恶寒重,发热轻,肢体酸楚,苔薄白,脉浮紧。其主穴
化学课堂教学是课堂教学活动的基本组织单位。下列属于化学课堂教学基本构成要素的是(
治疗胁肋疼痛,嘈杂吞酸,呕吐口苦,舌红苔黄,脉弦数者,宜用的方剂是A:黄连解毒汤
出法核算GDP的时候,企业投资是构成总需求的一个重要部分,这里的投资包括固定资产
有人认为“巨额的国家预算赤字必然会导致巨额的国家贸易逆差”。如果这样的话,那么世
下列哪种肿瘤与遗传因素关系密切A.胃癌 B.肺癌 C.视网膜母细胞瘤 D.
以下DNA分子中哪条链以逆向平行顺序与3′-dpACGGTACp-5′碱基互补配
我国《商业银行法》规定,设立城市商业银行的注册资本最低限额为()亿元人民币。A.
(2011年)根据《水土保持法》,生产建设项目中的水土保持设施应当与主体工程同时
引起人体病变最重要的阶段A、尾蚴 B、童虫 C、成虫 D、虫卵 E、毛蚴
最新回复
(
0
)