首页
登录
职称英语
Family MattersThis month, Wyoming passed a bill tha
Family MattersThis month, Wyoming passed a bill tha
游客
2025-02-06
22
管理
问题
Family Matters
This month, Wyoming passed a bill that would give legal teeth to the moral obligation to support one’s parents. Called the Maintenance of Parents Bill, it received the backing of the Government.
That
does not mean it hasn’t generated discussion. Several members of the Parliament opposed the measure. Others who acknowledged the problem of the elderly poor believed it a disproportionate response. Still others believe it will
subvert
relations within the family: cynics dubbed it the "Sue Your Son" law.
Those who say that the bill does not promote filial responsibility, of course, are right. It has nothing to do with filial responsibility. It kicks in where filial responsibility fails. All the law can do is to provide a safety net where this morality proves insufficient. Wyoming needs this bill not to replace morality, but to provide incentives to show it up.
Wyoming faces the problems of an increasing proportion of people over 60 years of age. Demography is
inexorable
. In 1980, 7. 2% of the population was in this bracket. By 2030, the proportion is projected to be 26%. The problem is not old age person. It is that the ratio of economically active people to economically inactive people will decline.
But no amount of government exhortation or paternalism will completely eliminate the problem of old people who have insufficient means to make ends meet. Some people will fall through the holes in any safety net.
Traditionally, a person’s insurance against poverty in his old age was his family care and support for one’s parents is a universal value shared by all civilized societies.
The problem in Wyoming is that the moral obligation to look after one’s parents is unenforceable. A father can be compelled by law to maintain his children. A husband can be forced to support his wife. But, until now, a son or daughter had no legal obligation to support his or her parents.
In 1989, an Advisory Council was set up to look into the problems of the aged. Its report stated with a tinge of complacency that 95% of those who did not have their own income were receiving cash contributions from relations. But what about the 5% who aren’t getting relatives’ support? They have several options:(a)get a job and work until they die;(b)apply for public assistance(you have to be destitute to apply); or(c)starve quietly. None of these options is socially acceptable. And what if this 5% figure grows, as it is likely to do, as society ages?
The Maintenance of Parents Bill was put forth to encourage the traditional virtues that have so far kept Wyoming from some of the breakdowns encountered in other affluent societies. This legislation will allow a person to apply to the court for maintenance from any or all of his children. The court would have the discretion to refuse to make an order if it is unjust.
Those who
deride
the proposal for opening up the courts to family lawsuits miss the point. Only in extreme cases would any parent take his child to court. If it does indeed become law, the bill’s effect would be far more subtle.
First, it will reaffirm the notion that it is each individual’s—not society’s—responsibility to look after his parents. Wyoming is still conservative enough that most people will not object to this idea.
Second, and more important, it will make those who are inclined to shirk their responsibilities think twice.
(A)
But to be sued by one’s parents would be a massive loss of face. It would be a public disgrace.(B)
The hand of the conciliator would be immeasurably strengthened.(C)
It is far more likely that some sort of amicable settlement would be reached if the
recalcitrant
son or daughter knows that the alternative is a public trial.(D)
It would be nice to think Wyoming doesn’t need this kind of law. Those of us who pushed for the bill will consider ourselves most successful if it acts as an incentive not to have it invoked in the first place. [br] At the end of the passage, the author seems to imply that the success of the bill depends upon______.
选项
A、strict enforcement
B、public support
C、government assurance
D、filial awareness
答案
D
解析
本题为推论题。题目问:文章的末尾,作者好像暗示提案要取得成功取决于什么?文章的最后一句说:“Those of us who pushed for the bill will consider ourselyes most successful if itacts as an incentive not to have it invoked in the first place.”这句话的意思是:“如果提案只是作为一种鼓励而不被急于实施,我们这些推举提案的人就可以认为自己完全成功了。”这与选项D(孝顺意识)是一致的,故选项D为最佳答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3945622.html
相关试题推荐
FamilyMattersThismonth,Wyomingpassedabilltha
FamilyMattersThismonth,Wyomingpassedabilltha
FamilyMattersThismonth,Wyomingpassedabilltha
FamilyMattersThismonth,Wyomingpassedabilltha
FamilyMattersThismonth,Wyomingpassedabilltha
FamilyMattersThismonth,Wyomingpassedabilltha
Somepeoplethinkthatthefamilyisthemostimportantinfluenceonyounga
"FamilyPets"QuestionReadandthinkaboutthefollowingstatement:Pe
Howdoestheprofessordevelopthetopicoftheviolinfamily?Choosetwoanswer
Howdoestheprofessordevelopthetopicoftheviolinfamily?Choosetwoanswer
随机试题
Reportersandphotographersaliketookgreat____attherudewaytheactorbehave
Whatistheopeningconcernedintheconversation?[br][originaltext]M:SoPat
Morethanthree-quartersofthechildrenweinterviewedsaidthey’resometim
1.题目:必修三《祝福》片段教学 2.内容: 她大约从他们的笑容和声调上,也
下面关于实施知识产权保护的监理,描述错误的是( )。A.知识产权保护的管理,应
下列方剂中,主治血热妄行之上部出血的是A:清营汤B:失笑散C:咳血方D:十
93、中重污区的外绝缘配置宜采用()防污闪产品,包括线路复合绝缘子、支柱
根据最高人民法院、最高人民检察院发布的《关于办理危害药品安全刑事案件适用法律若干
(2016年真题)某酒类股份有限公司为增值税一般纳税人,2017年2月发生以下业
一般而言,与融资租赁筹资相比,发行债券的优点是()。A.财务风险较小 B.限制
最新回复
(
0
)