首页
登录
职称英语
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Telephone and email h
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Telephone and email h
游客
2025-02-05
1
管理
问题
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Telephone and email have made communication between people less personal. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
选项
答案
Have telephone and email made communication between people less personal?
Some people argue that telephone and e-mail have made communication between people less personal. I both agree and disagree with this statement. Truely, telephone and email are less personal than meeting someone face-to-face. However, they on any account cannot impair the intimacy between people.
As mentioned above, using the telephone or email to communicate with others is definitely less personal than speaking with someone in person. There are many advantages of communicating with someone face to face. For example, you can read their body language. Body language, which includes facial expressions, is a key indicator of how a person is reacting to the conversation. If we are not present to be able to see these clues, there is much more room for misinterpretation. This can cause annoying misunderstandings between people, especially when having a serious discussion about an important matter.
This, however, does not mean that communication is less personal between people because of these technologies. I believe that when people need to have a serious conversation, they will use the telephone or email to set up a meeting time to discuss a topic in person. For the most part, individuals will not have an important conversation utilizing one of these methods. When viewed from this perspective, it becomes clear that the telephone and email actually enhance our ability to communicate effectively with others. Because of these technologies, we can easily access others when necessary.
In conclusion, I think that if a person is going to solely use the telephone or email as his/her primary method of communication, this communication with others will definitely be less personal. However, if the person uses these technologies to contact others, but saves important conversations for face-to-face meetings, there is no loss of connection.
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3944415.html
相关试题推荐
Doyouagreeordisagreewiththefollowingstatement?Peopleshouldreadon
Doyouagreeordisagreewiththefollowingstatement?Dancingplaysanimpo
Doyouagreeordisagreewiththefollowingstatement?Telephoneandemailh
Doyouagreeordisagreewiththefollowingstatement?Childrenshouldbegin
Doyouagreeordisagreewiththefollowingstatement?Gamesareasimportan
Doyouagreeordisagreewiththefollowingstatement?Businessesshoulddo
Doyouagreeordisagreewiththefollowingstatement?Grades(marks)encour
Doyouagreeordisagreewiththefollowingstatement?Thereisnothingthat
Doyouagreeordisagreewiththefollowingstatement?Allstudentsshouldb
Doyouagreeordisagreewiththefollowingstatement?Parentsarethebest
随机试题
(1)InasunnyroominasmallapartmentintheTokyosatellitetownofKunita
Smartphonesare______theoldonesinperformance.A、inferiorthanB、superiorto
[originaltext](3)Nigeria’ssecurityforceshavekilledmorethan150peacefulp
【L1】[br]【L9】[originaltext]Goodmorning,everyone.Firstaboutyoursecond
抛石挤淤、爆炸挤淤应依据图纸所示位置和范围,按照抛石体积的片石数量,以()
根据关系数据库规范化理论,关系数据库中的关系要满足第一范式。下面“部门”关系中,
关于砂当量试验,下列说法正确的是()。A.砂当量可以测定天然砂、人工砂所含
汽车上一般都设有“安全带指示灯”提醒驾驶员系好安全带。当安全带系好时,控制开关断
下列何种情境不属于剥夺当事人的辩论权利:()A.由于法庭案件过多最终没有组
增加致癌率的中药是A.莪术 B.芫花 C.狼毒 D.巴豆霜 E.甘遂
最新回复
(
0
)