首页
登录
职称英语
"The Heredity Versus Environment Debate"P1 The past cen
"The Heredity Versus Environment Debate"P1 The past cen
游客
2025-02-05
25
管理
问题
"The Heredity Versus Environment Debate"
P1 The past century has seen heated controversy about whether intelligence, which relates strongly to school achievement, is determined primarily by heredity or by environment. A When
IQ
tests were undergoing rapid development early in the twentieth century, many psychologists believed that intelligence was determined primarily by heredity. B
P2 Environmentalist view. By the middle of the twentieth century, numerous studies had counteracted the hereditarian view, and most social scientists took the position that environment is as important as or even more important than heredity in determining intelligence. C Social scientists who stress the environmentalist view of intelligence generally emphasize the need for continual compensatory programs beginning in infancy. Many also criticize the use of IQ tests on the grounds that these tests are culturally biased. D
P3 James Flynn, who collected similar data on other countries, found that "massive" gains in the IQ scores of the population in fourteen nations have occurred during the twentieth century. These improvements, according to Flynn’s analysis, largely stemmed not from genetic improvement in the population but from environmental changes that ied to gains in the kinds of skills assessed by IQ tests. Torsten Husen and his colleagues also have concluded, after reviewing large amounts of data, that improvements in economic and social conditions, and particularly in the availability of schooling, can produce substantial gains in average IQ from one generation to the next. In general, educators committed to improving the performance of low-achieving students find these studies encouraging.
P4 Hereditarian view. The hereditarian view of intelligence underwent a major revival in the 1970s and 1980s, based particularly on the writings of Arthur Jensen, Richard Herrnstein, and a group of researchers conducting the Minnesota Study of Twins. Summarizing previous research as well as their own studies, these researchers identified heredity as the major factor in determining intelligence—accounting for up to 80 percent of the variation in IQ scores.
P5 Jensen published a highly controversial study in the Harvard Educational Review in 1969. Pointing out that African-Americans averaged about 15 points below whites on IQ tests, Jensen attributed this gap to a genetic difference between the two races in learning abilities and patterns. Critics countered Jensen’s arguments by contending that a host of environmental factors that affect IQ, including malnutrition and prenatal care are difficult to measure and impossible to separate from hereditary factors. IQ tests are biased, they said, and do not necessarily even measure intelligence. After his 1969 article, Jensen has continued to cite data that he believed link intelligence primarily to heredity. His critics continue to respond with evidence that environmental factors, and schooling in particular, have a major influence on IQ.
P6 Synthesizers’ view. Certain social scientists have taken a middle, or "synthesizing," position in this controversy. The synthesizers’ view of intelligence holds that both heredity and environment contribute to differences in measured intelligence. For example, Christopher Jencks, after reviewing a large amount of data, concluded that heredity is responsible for 45 percent of the IQ variance, environment accounts for 35 percent, and interaction between the two ("interaction" meaning that particular abilities thrive or wither in specific environments) accounts for 20 percent. Robert Nichols reviewed all these and other data and concluded that the true value for heredity may be anywhere between 0.40 and 0.80 but that the exact value has little importance for policy. In general, Nichols and other synthesizers maintain that heredity determines the fixed limits of a range; within those limits, the interaction between environment and heredity yields the individual’s intelligence. In this view, even if interactions between heredity and environment limit our ability to specify exactly how much of a child’s intelligence reflects environmental factors, teachers (and parents) should provide each child with a productive environment in which to realize her or his maximum potential.
Glossary
IQ: intelligence quotient; a numerical value for intelligence [br] The word data in the passage is closest in meaning to
选项
A、experts
B、advice
C、arguments
D、information
答案
D
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3944226.html
相关试题推荐
"TheHeredityVersusEnvironmentDebate"P1Thepastcen
"TheHeredityVersusEnvironmentDebate"P1Thepastcen
"TheHeredityVersusEnvironmentDebate"P1Thepastcen
"TheHeredityVersusEnvironmentDebate"P1Thepastcen
"TheHeredityVersusEnvironmentDebate"P1Thepastcen
ReconstructingAncientEnvironmentsP1:Archaeologyisparticularlyimportantfo
ReconstructingAncientEnvironmentsP1:Archaeologyisparticularlyimportantfo
ReconstructingAncientEnvironmentsP1:Archaeologyisparticularlyimportantfo
ReconstructingAncientEnvironmentsP1:Archaeologyisparticularlyimportantfo
ReconstructingAncientEnvironmentsP1:Archaeologyisparticularlyimportantfo
随机试题
Ifa1=0,an=an-1/2+4,whichofthefollowingisapproximatelytoa100?A、16B、4C
Toomuchtelevisioncanbedetrimentalforkids’development,evenwhenthey
讲英语的人听到别人赞扬,一般说“谢谢”,表示接受,说明自己认为对方的赞扬是诚心诚意的,所赞扬的事是值得赞扬的。因此不应“假装自卑”或“故作谦虚”。但是,
大华公司生产A、B两种产品,有关年产销量、批次、工时和成本等的资料如下表所示
渗流变形取决于()。A.土的颗粒组成 B.土的颗粒级配 C.细粒土的含量
Web组件是Web开发过程中常用的一个软件单元,有些组件是为完成一个特定功能而存
患儿9个月,因呕吐、腹泻2天入院,初步诊断为婴儿腹泻伴脱水。如患儿需要静脉补钾,
以划拨方式取得土地使用权,转让房地产时,可以不办理土地使用权出让手续,但将转让房
就潜在损失的程度而言,()是首要的银行风险,少数重要客户的违约可能会给银行带
设定企业发展目标要考虑以下( )因素。A.考虑存量变化 B.以盈利为最终目的
最新回复
(
0
)