首页
登录
职称英语
CROWN-OF-THORNS STARFISH AND CORAL REEFS
CROWN-OF-THORNS STARFISH AND CORAL REEFS
游客
2025-02-04
8
管理
问题
CROWN-OF-THORNS STARFISH AND CORAL REEFS
(1) The crown-of-thorns starfish, Acanthaster planet, is large, 25 to 35 centimeters in diameter, and has 7 to 21 arms that are covered in spines. It feeds primarily on coral and is found from the Indian Ocean to the west coast of Central America, usually at quite low population densities. Since the mid-1950s, population outbreaks at densities four to six times greater than normal have occurred at the same time in places such as Hawaii, Tahiti, Panama, and the Great Barrier Reef. The result has often been the loss of a 50% to nearly 100% of the coral cover over large areas.
(2) [A] A single Acanthaster can consume 5 to 6 square meters of coral polyps per year, and dense populations can destroy up to 6 square kilometers per year. [B] Acanthasters show a preference for branching corals, especially Acroporids. [C] After an outbreak in a particular area, it is common to find that Acroporids have been selectively removed, leaving a mosaic of living and dead corals. [D] In places where Acroporids previously dominated the community devastation can be almost complete, and local areas of reefs have collapsed.
(3) Areas of dead coral are usually colonized rapidly by algae and often are later colonized by sponges and soft corals. Increases in abundance of plant-eating fish and decreases in abundance of coral-feeding fish
accompany
these changes. Coral larvae settle among the algae and eventually establish flourishing coral colonies. In 10 to 15 years the reefs often return to about the same percentage of coral cover as before. Development of a four-species diversity takes about 20 years.
(4) Two schools of thought exist concerning the cause of these outbreaks. One group holds that they are natural phenomena that have occurred many times in the past, citing old men’s recollections of earlier outbreaks and evidence from traditional cultures. The other group maintains that recent human activities ranging from physical coral destruction through pollution to predator removal have triggered these events.
(5) One theory, the adult aggregation hypothesis, maintains that most species are more abundant than we realize when a storm destroys coral and causes a food shortage. The adult Acanthasters converge on remaining portions of healthy coral and feed hungrily. Certainly there have been outbreaks of Acanthasters following large storms, but there is little evidence that the storms have caused the enough reef damage to create a food shortage for these starfish.
(6) Two other hypotheses attempt to explain the increased abundance of Acanthasters after episodes of high terrestrial runoff following storms. The first hypothesis is that low salinity and high temperatures favor the survival of the starfish larvae. The second hypothesis emphasizes the food web aspect, suggesting that strong fresh water runoff brings additional nutrients to the coastal waters, stimulating phytoplankton production and promoting more rapid development and better survival of the starfish larvae.
(7) Those favoring anthropogenic (human influenced) causes have pointed to the large proportion of outbreaks that have been near centers of human populations. It has been suggested that coral polyps are the main predators of the starfish larvae.
Destruction of coral by blasting and other bad land use practices would reduce predation on the starfish larvae and cause a feedback in which increases in Acanthaster populations cause still further coral destruction.
Unfortunately, there are too few documented instances of physical destruction of coral being followed by outbreaks of Acanthasters for these hypotheses to be fully supported.
(8) Another group of hypothesis focuses on removal of Acanthaster predators. Some have suggested that the predators might have been killed off by pollution whereas others have suggested that the harvesting of vertebrate and invertebrate predators of Acanthasters could have reduced mortality and caused increased abundance of adults. The problem with this group of hypothesis is that it is difficult to understand how reduced predation would lead to sudden increases in Acanthaster numbers in several places at the same time in specific years. It seems probable that there is no single explanation but that there are elements of the truth in several of the hypotheses. That is there are natural processes that have led to outbreaks in the past, but human impact has increased the frequency and severity of the outbreaks. [br] What can be inferred from paragraph 6 about the diet of Acanthaster larvae?
选项
A、Phytoplankton is an important food source for them.
B、Storm water runoff washes away important nutrients they need.
C、When water temperature rises they have difficulty finding enough food.
D、Storms add needed salt to their diet.
答案
A
解析
本题要求根据第6段来推断与棘冠海星幼虫的饮食相关的信息。原文第6段最后一句提到,强劲的淡水径流给沿海水域带来了额外的养分,促进了浮游生物的繁殖,使棘冠海星幼虫能够更好地生存,更快地增长,由此可推断出A项“浮游植物是它们重要的食物来源”正确。B项“雨水径流冲走了它们所需要的养分”与第6段最后一句提到的“雨水带来养分”意思相悖。C项“当水温升高时,它们很难找到足够的食物”和D项“暴风雨带来了它们需要的盐分”均与原文第6段第2句“第一种假说是低盐度和高温有利于棘冠海星幼虫的存活”所给信息相悖。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3941967.html
相关试题推荐
CROWN-OF-THORNSSTARFISHANDCORALREEFS
CROWN-OF-THORNSSTARFISHANDCORALREEFS
CROWN-OF-THORNSSTARFISHANDCORALREEFS
CROWN-OF-THORNSSTARFISHANDCORALREEFS
CROWN-OF-THORNSSTARFISHANDCORALREEFS
CROWN-OF-THORNSSTARFISHANDCORALREEFS
CROWN-OF-THORNSSTARFISHANDCORALREEFS
CROWN-OF-THORNSSTARFISHANDCORALREEFS
CROWN-OF-THORNSSTARFISHANDCORALREEFS
CROWN-OF-THORNSSTARFISHANDCORALREEFS
随机试题
[originaltext]Atpresent,humanbeingshaveusedmanydevicestomeasureti
节点①中防火封堵材料厚度最少应为:() A.50 B.80
集中生活热水供应系统的第一循环管网是指()。A.热源一次热媒的循环 B.生
企业在成熟期的财务战略不具备的特点是()。A:大规模追加投资B:增加支付利润
某双车道公路隧道采用全断面法开挖掘进,对该隧道进行施工监控量测,请回答以下问题。
亚临床型维生素A缺乏诊断的方法之一是A.眼睛干燥 B.皮肤角化 C.牙釉质发
10岁的小明是四川省某小学三年级的学生。2008年5月12日汶川大地震发生时,学
( )是指美国的证券中央保管和清算机构,负责ADR的保管和清算。A.存券银行
A.百会 B.大椎 C.水沟 D.印堂 E.风府既治疗急危重症,又治疗闪
下列行为中不符合承揽合同特征的是( )。A.承揽人应当以自己的设备、技术和劳动力
最新回复
(
0
)