Before, whenever we had wealth, we started discussing poverty. Why not now?

游客2025-01-30 7

问题 Before, whenever we had wealth, we started discussing poverty. Why not now? Why is the current politics of wealth and poverty seemingly about wealth alone? Eight years ago, when Bill Clinton first ran for president, the Dow Jones average was under 3,500, yearly federal budget deficits were projected at hundreds of billions of dollars forever and beyond, and no one talked about the "permanent boom" or the "new economy. " Yet in that more straitened time, Clinton made much of the importance of " not leaving a single person behind. " It is possible that similar "compassionate" rhetoric might yet play a role in the general election.
But it is striking how much less talk there is about the poor than there was eight years ago, when the country was economically uncertain, or in previous eras, when the country felt flush. Even last summer, when Clinton spent several days on a remarkable, Bobby Kennedy-like pilgrimage through impoverished areas from Indian reservations in South Dakota to ghetto neighborhoods in East St. Louis, the administration decided to refer to the effort not as a poverty tour but as a "new market initiative. "
What is happening is partly a logical, policy-driven reaction. Poverty really is lower than it has been in decades, especially for minority groups. The most attractive solution to it — a growing economy — is being applied. The people who have been totally left out of this boom often have medical, mental or other problems for which no one has an immediate solution. "The economy has sucked in anyone who has any preparation, any ability to cope with modern life," says Franklin D. Raines, the former director of the Office of Management and Budget who is now head of Fannie Mae. When he and other people who specialize in the issue talk about solutions, they talk analytically and on a long-term basis: education, development of work skills, shifts in the labor market, adjustments in welfare reform.
But I think there is another force that has made this a rich era with barely visible poor people. It is the unusual social and imaginative separation between prosperous America and those still left, out... It’s simple invisibility, because of increasing geographic, occupational, and social barriers that block one group from the others’ view. [br] The main idea of the passage is that______.

选项 A、The country is enjoying economic growth
B、The poor are benefiting from today’s good economy
C、We were more aware of the poor than we are today
D、There were many more poor people than there are today

答案 C

解析主旨题型第一、二段谈及人们现在谈论贫穷(关注贫穷)比以往少了，并举例说明；第三段谈及了部分原因；第四段作者谈及自己认为几乎看不见穷人的原因；由此推断出本文主要是讲过去我们对穷人的关注比现在多，因此答案为C。

转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3935599.html

相关试题推荐

随机试题

最新回复(0)

Before, whenever we had wealth, we started discussing poverty. Why not now?

ItwasnotlongbeforeSkinners,thefamousbehaviorist,realizedthelimitation

ShetoldmethatshehasalreadygonetotheUnitedStatesfourtimesbeforeshe