首页
登录
职称英语
Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, b
Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, b
游客
2025-01-30
31
管理
问题
Municipal
bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective. But are all smoking bans equally successful?
The barkeeper and blogger who writes as "Scribbler50" was outraged when, in 2003, New York City enacted one of the first comprehensive smoking bans in bars and restaurants, "How can a guy and some board just kick us in the teeth like this? This smacks of fascism." If people are aware of the consequences of smoking or visiting places with lots of secondhand smoke, should the government really have to tell us what to do? Won’t people just vote with their feet and smoke even more when they’re at home and away from restrictions?
Scribbler50’s post inspired the physician who blogs as "PalMD" last week to look up the research on the effectiveness of smoking bans. He found several studies showing that not only did workers in restaurants and bars show improved health shortly after the bans were put in place, but smokers themselves also reduced the number of cigarettes they smoked.
Overall, however, smoking rates remain persistently high, despite the common workplace smoking bans. Can other government measures help these smokers live healthier lives, or at least prevent people from taking up the habit?
In the U.S., warning messages have been in place on cigarette packages for decades. But the messages are rather clinical, for example: "Smoking Causes Lung Cancer, Heart Disease, and May Complicate Pregnancy." What if packages contained more dramatic warnings? In January, psychologist and science writer Christian Jarrett looked at a small study of smokers’ reactions to cigarette warnings. The researchers measured self-esteem in student smokers, then showed them cigarette packages with either death-related warnings ("Smokers die earlier") or esteem-related warnings ("Smoking makes you unattractive"). Students who derived self-esteem from smoking and saw the death-related warnings later viewed smoking more positively than those who saw the esteem-related warnings. For students whose smoking wasn’t motivated by self-esteem, the effect was reversed.
So not all anti-smoking messages are equal: Depending on who the message is directed at, a morbid warning on a cigarette label may actually
backfire
.
Scribbler50, for his part, is now a convert favoring smoking restrictions, at least in his narrow limits as a bartender. His patrons who haven’t quit smoking say they smoke a lot less now that they have to go outside to get a nicotine fix. He doesn’t miss emptying ashtrays, or the holier-than-thou customers who complained every time a fellow patron lit up, or working in a smoke-filled bar all night and going home "smelling like you put out a three-alarm".
Would it be right to enact even more restrictions on smoking in the interest of public health? It’s hard to deny that banning smoking in public, indoor spaces has been a huge success. Why not try out some stronger smoking bans? Parents in some areas are already restricted from smoking in cars with children, but I haven’t seen a study that evaluates the success of those measures. Perhaps a state or municipality could try extending the ban to homes, with provisions for studying the results. It’s also possible that stronger measures would be counter-productive, like the stronger warnings on cigarette labels. Maybe we’ll decide that at some level deciding whether or not to smoke should still be an individual choice. Or maybe in a few generations, it won’t be necessary to regulate smoking: There won’t be any smokers left. [br] According to the passage, "Scribbler50" believes that______.
选项
A、people drinking in the bar do not care about others’ smoking
B、people drinking in the bar hope to ban smoking
C、people walk into the bar without knowing others’ smoking there
D、people smoking in the bar do not worry about drinking
答案
A
解析
语义推理。根据第二段“If people are aware of the consequences of smoking or visiting places with lots of secondhand smoke,should the government really have to tell us what to do”可知,去酒吧的人们不在乎他人的二手烟,故选B。【知识拓展】本题属语义推理题。原文以设问表达情绪和态度,本题用陈述句表述类似的意思,需要从疑问语气推导到陈述语气,这样,语气转换就是推导的手段。类似的还有正话反说、反话正说等。可以举一反三。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3935380.html
相关试题推荐
Somepeopleprefertoeatatfoodstandsorrestaurants.Otherpeoplepreferto
Thetermcontrolishighly—andunjustifiably—unpopular.Someofitsunpopula
TheawardwaswonbyDennisJohnson,______thecoachhighlyrespects.A、whoB、whom
Scientistshavediscoveredaclose______betweensmokingandseveralseriousdise
Ifyoudon’t______smoking,you’11nevergetbetter.A、giveoffB、giveoutC、give
Municipalbansonsmokinginrestaurantsandbarsarehighlycontroversial,b
Municipalbansonsmokinginrestaurantsandbarsarehighlycontroversial,b
Municipalbansonsmokinginrestaurantsandbarsarehighlycontroversial,b
Municipalbansonsmokinginrestaurantsandbarsarehighlycontroversial,b
Municipalbansonsmokinginrestaurantsandbarsarehighlycontroversial,b
随机试题
Womenfromthemid-30stothemid-50sarelesslikelythanAmericansoverall
PASSAGETHREE[br]Whatcountryisgoingtowitnessthebiggestincreaseincoal
[originaltext]OnthefoggynightofJuly25,1956,oneofthegreatseadis
有一肝病患者,临床表现为消化道出血,皮肤瘀斑,鼻出血,应选择哪组筛选试验为住A.
关于量取操作描述正确的是A:根据量取药物容量的多少,选择适宜的量器(量杯、量筒)
党的十六大报告指出,在社会发展阶段上,我国( ) A.已经进入小康社会 B
不属于白色血栓的是( )。A.静脉内柱状血栓的头部 B.动脉内延续性血栓的头
电泳分离蛋白质的依据是A.蛋白质紫外吸收的最大波长280nm B.蛋白质是两性
下列各项中,没有违反《会计法>规定的是()。A:某商场为了促销,向其客户提供了与
预付款担保的主要作用是()。 A.促使承包商履行合同约定,保护业主的
最新回复
(
0
)