2. 职称英语
  3. Why do readers of New Scientist continue to get steamed up about race? After all

Why do readers of New Scientist continue to get steamed up about race? After all

游客2025-01-29  13
问题 Why do readers of New Scientist continue to get steamed up about race? After all, it can be used as an innocuous technical term by anthropologists. But all too often discussions of "race" lead to "racism", and tempers begin to fray. Before the 18th century, race merely described a group of common cultural origin, not one defined by immutable characteristics. Unfortunately, this usage changed as the Western powers colonized Asia and Africa and needed a way to characterize the peoples they subjected as not only different, but inferior.
    A long list of scientists helped to "classify" the races. Among them were some of the famous names of the 18th and 19th centuries: Linnaeus, Cuvier, Haeckel, Huxley and Buffon. Although their classifications rarely agreed, many accepted that the races were fundamentally different and could be arranged with Caucasians at the top.
    Only after the Darwinian evolution and the emergence of genetics did the notion of a league table start to crumble. By the 1940s, UNESCO could emphatically state:    "Racism falsely claims that there is a scientific basis for arranging groups hierarchically in terms of psychological and cultural characteristics that are immutable and innate."
    That groups cannot be arranged hierarchically does not mean that anthropologists cannot set up classifications which divide people into different groups, or that such classifications will not be useful, as several of our latter writers point out. For example, they can provide vital tools (along with language distribution) to reconstruct the prehistoric movements of peoples. Where genetic data are available, these reconstructions can be greatly refined.
    In other contexts, such classifications are misleading. Many of the differences they record (including facial features, skin and hair color) are most probably superficial adaptations to local climate. Although useful as indicators of the origin of different groups, they imply nothing fundamental about differences between them.
    Attempts to assess more important differences between groups (of any number of cognitive abilities, for example) always come to the same very well-known conclusion—that the differences between individuals within one racial group are much larger than the differences between the average members of two such groups.
    What this means is that it is impossible to say anything about a particular individual’s ability because of his or her race (however, defined) because the spread of variation within a race is larger than the average difference between races. Racism can thus receive no support from science, even though a classification of races can be scientifically useful.
    Lay people sometimes put more faith in the concept of race than scientists do, perhaps because they believe they can quite easily identify a person’s race or even nationality. But it’s not that easy: our correspondent from Le Vesinet, for example, identified some of the people in our recent feature ("Genes in Black and White") as Australian, Sicilian, Sumatran and Brazilian. In fact, they came from Sweden, Greece, the Central African Republic and Russia. [br] The classifications of races by anthropologists are useful in that they _____.
选项 A、divide people into different groups
B、help to define prehistoric human movements
C、contribute to language distribution
D、provide tools for the study of prehistoric human movements
答案 D
解析 本题问人类学家对种族的划分是有用的，其原因是什么。根据第4段第2句可知，种族划分能帮助重构史前人类迁徙的轨迹，因此D“为研究史前人类迁徙轨迹提供工具”正确。A“将人类划分为不同的群体”是种群划分的内涵，选A就会变成“种群划分有用就是因为种群划分”，逻辑不通。B“帮助划定史前人类运动轨迹”，相比D来讲，B夸大了种族划分的作用，D更贴合文意。C“为语言分布做贡献”。文中没有提及划分种群对语言的作用。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3933273.html
相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)