首页
登录
职称英语
Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but
Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but
游客
2025-01-28
18
管理
问题
Municipal
bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective. But are all smoking bans equally successful?
The barkeeper and blogger who writes as "Scribbler50" was outraged when, in 2003, New York City enacted one of the first comprehensive smoking bans in bars and restaurants, "How can a guy and some board just kick us in the teeth like this? This smacks of fascism." If people are aware of the consequences of smoking or visiting places with lots of secondhand smoke, should the government really have to tell us what to do? Won’t people just vote with their feet and smoke even more when they’re at home and away from restrictions?
Scribbler50’s post inspired the physician who blogs as "PalMD" last week to look up the research on the effectiveness of smoking bans. He found several studies showing that not only did workers in restaurants and bars show improved health shortly after the bans were put in place, but smokers themselves also reduced the number of cigarettes they smoked.
Overall, however, smoking rates remain persistently high, despite the common workplace smoking bans. Can other government measures help these smokers live healthier lives, or at least prevent people from taking up the habit?
In the U.S., warning messages have been in place on cigarette packages for decades. But the messages are rather clinical, for example: "Smoking Causes Lung Cancer, Heart Disease, and May Complicate Pregnancy." What if packages contained more dramatic warnings? In January, psychologist and science writer Christian Jarrett looked at a small study of smokers’ reactions to cigarette warnings. The researchers measured self-esteem in student smokers, then showed them cigarette packages with either death-related warnings ("Smokers die earlier") or esteem-related warnings ("Smoking makes you unattractive"). Students who derived self-esteem from smoking and saw the death-related warnings later viewed smoking more positively than those who saw the esteem-related warnings. For students whose smoking wasn’t motivated by self-esteem, the effect was reversed.
So not all anti-smoking messages are equal: Depending on who the message is directed at, a morbid warning on a cigarette label may actually
backfire
.
Scribbler50 for his part, is now a convert favoring smoking restrictions, at least in his narrow limits as a bartender. His patrons who haven’t quit smoking say they smoke a lot less now that they have to go outside to get a nicotine fix. He doesn’t miss emptying ashtrays, or the holier-than-thou customers who complained every time a fellow patron lit up, or working in a smoke-filled bar all night and going home "smelling like you put out a three-alarm".
Would it be right to enact even more restrictions on smoking in the interest of public health? It’s hard to deny that banning smoking in public, indoor spaces has been a huge success. Why not try out some stronger smoking bans? Parents in some areas are already restricted from smoking in cars with children, but I haven’t seen a study that evaluates the success of those measures. Perhaps a state or municipality could try extending the ban to homes, with provisions for studying the results. It’s also possible that stronger measures would be counter-productive, like the stronger warnings on cigarette labels. Maybe we’ll decide that at some level deciding whether or not to smoke should still be an individual choice. Or maybe in a few generations, it won’t be necessary to regulate smoking: There won’t be any smokers left. [br] What’s the assumption of the author about smoking restriction according to the last paragraph?
选项
A、People can try out some gentler smoking bans.
B、The municipality could try to extend smoking bans to homes.
C、It will not be a personal choice to decide whether or not to smoke.
D、It is still necessary to restrict smoking after several generations.
答案
B
解析
最后一段第5句说到,在结果可评估的情况下,可考虑将禁烟措施延申到家庭领域,故选B“市政当局可以尝试把禁烟令延申到家庭”。A“人们可以尝试更温和的禁烟措施”,最后一段无提及。C“吸烟与否不会是个人选择问题”和倒数第二句的文意相反。D“几代之后,仍有必要禁烟”,作者在最后一句推测可能几代之后就不需要禁烟了,因为没人吸烟了,故排除D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3933066.html
相关试题推荐
Inspiteofrelativelycostly,thedieselengineishighlyefficientandneedss
Municipalbansonsmokinginrestaurantsandbarsarehighlycontroversial,b
Municipalbansonsmokinginrestaurantsandbarsarehighlycontroversial,b
Municipalbansonsmokinginrestaurantsandbarsarehighlycontroversial,b
Municipalbansonsmokinginrestaurantsandbarsarehighlycontroversial,b
Sallyappearsbeingahardtimeconvincingherhusbandtogiveupsmoking.A、tob
Thegoosequillpenhasagreatsentimentalappealintoday’shighlymechanized
Anyonetryingtobreakabadhabit—whetheritbesmoking,drinking,overeatingo
Begivenenoughresources,evenahighlyradioactivesitecanbedecontaminated
Sallyappearsbeingahardtimeconvincingherhusbandtogiveupsmoking.A、tob
随机试题
Itgoeswithoutsaying,then,thatlanguageisalsoapoliticalinstrument,mea
在出版物发行活动的构成要素中,( )是发行活动产生和发展的原动力。A.出版单位
建筑施工企业主要负责人对建筑施工企业日常生产经营活动和安全生产工作全面负责、具有
J2EE应用系统支持五种不同类型的构件模型,包括( )。 A.Apple
下列哪项是温脾汤和理中丸中均含有的药物A.干姜、附子、甘草 B.干姜、附子、人
站用交流电源系统验收细则中,站用交流电源柜内的欠压脱扣应设置一定延时,防止因站用
2019年8月17日,中国人民银行宣布,改革完善贷款市场报价利率(LPR)形成机
根据民事诉讼法及相关的司法解释,下列选项对于执行措施的说法错误的有:()
患者,男性,30岁。右颞下颌关节无痛性弹响3个月,检查:开口度50mm,两侧关节
下列产生费用偏差的原因中,属于业主原因的有()。A.增加内容 B.建设手续不全
最新回复
(
0
)