Obama’s Energy Policy While the Gulf of Mexico oil sp

游客2025-01-21 9

问题 Obama’s Energy Policy
While the Gulf of Mexico oil spill that prompted the president’s speech is an unprecedented catastrophe, it’s nothing compared to what’s ahead if we keep pretending that fossil fuels are cheap. Addressing our habits of carbon consumption isn’t just the most important possible response to this particular disaster. It’s probably the most important issue this president, or any other for the next few decades, will face. Moreover, there’s a fairly clear solution that’s already been outlined: at the moment, there’s an implicit public subsidy for carbon use that enables our reliance, so the government needs to compensate for it by jack up the price of energy somehow. A cap-and-trade system is the preferred method here in much the same way that an insurance mandate was in healthcare reform: it’s a politically palatable partial measure, but far better than nothing.
But Obama gave a lame speech by only offering vague generalities about " increasing the cost of energy," failing to lay out the case for the reform that he knows perfectly well to be the only viable one. In fact, if the president decided to take the idea of energy reform to the people, he probably still wouldn’t get legislation passed. But even in failure, there’s something to be gained from speaking clearly and honestly to the public.
Woodrow Wilson was a generally pretty detestable guy, but there’s something Obama could learn from him. At the end of World War I, Wilson expended massive, futile effort trying to convince Americans that the League of Nations was the world’s only hope for peace and stability. The Republicans who opposed Wilson over the League succeeded, in large part, because a weary country wasn’t willing to accept an intellectual president’s high-flown scheme to prevent the recent disaster from repeating.
When the feeble League failed and the crisis of the 1930s developed into World War II, it offered a kind of perverse validation to Wilson’s effort. By forcefully campaigning for the United States to take a central role in global stability, he had elucidated the choices facing the American people. After World War II, the argument of 1919 reoccurred, but it was won by Wilson’s successor, Harry Truman. The reoccurrence of global war had validated Wilson’s argument, making it much easier for Truman to sell Americans on the Marshall Plan, NATO, the United Nations and, ultimately, the Cold War itself. By being ambitious and clear, Wilson lost, but his side won out in the long term for the same reason. [br] Woodrow Wilson’s argument was supported by______.

选项 A、the failure of the League of Nations
B、the outbreak of World War II
C、the launch of the Marshall Plan
D、the occurrence of the Cold War

答案 B

解析细节题型，答案是B。题干主干为Wilson’s argument，答题者可在第四段发现原词并锁定线索：“The reoccurrence of global War had validated Wilson’s argument”，可见B为正确答案。本题核心：可通过快速阅读法根据核心关键词实现细节的定位。

转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3922124.html

相关试题推荐

随机试题

最新回复(0)

Obama’s Energy Policy While the Gulf of Mexico oil sp

Thepossibilitiesfor______energysources,includingsolarpower,windpower,ge

Thepossibilitiesfor________energysources,includingsolarpower,windpower,