首页
登录
职称英语
Jan Hendrik Schon’s success seemed too good to be true, and it was. In only
Jan Hendrik Schon’s success seemed too good to be true, and it was. In only
游客
2025-01-19
5
管理
问题
Jan Hendrik Schon’s success seemed too good to be true, and it was. In only four years as a physicist at Bell Laboratories, Schon, 32, had co-authored 90 scientific papers—one every 16 days-detailing new discoveries in superconductivity, lasers, nanotechnology and quantum physics. This output astonished his colleagues, and made them
suspicious
. When one co-worker noticed that the same table of data appeared in two separate papers—which also happened to appear in the two most prestigious scientific journals in the world, Science and Nature—the jig was up. In October 2002, a Bell Labs investigation found that Schon had falsified and
fabricated
data. His career as a scientist was finished. Scientific scandals, which are as old as science itself, tend to follow similar patterns of due reward.
In recent years, of course, the pressure on scientists to publish in the top journals has increased, making the journals much more crucial to career success. The questions are whether Nature and Science have become too powerful as arbiters of what science reaches to the public, and whether the journals are up to their task as gatekeepers.
Each scientific specialty has its own set of journals. Physicists have Physical Review Letters, neuroscientists have Neuron, and so forth. Science and Nature, though, are the only two major journals that cover the gamut of scientific disciplines, from meteorology and zoology to quantum physics and chemistry. As a result, journalists look to them each week for
the cream of the crop
of new science papers. And scientists look to the journals in part to reach journalists. Why do they care? Competition for grants has gotten so fierce that scientists have sought popular renown to gain an edge over their rivals. Publication in specialized journals will win the
acclaims
from academics and satisfy the publish-or-perish imperative, but Science and Nature come with the added bonus of potentially getting your paper written up in The New York Times and other publications.
Scientists tend to pay more attention to the big two than to other journals. When more scientists know about a particular paper, they’re more apt to cite it in their own papers. Being oft-cited will increase a scientist’s "Impact Factor", a measure of how often papers are cited by peers. Funding agencies use the "Impact Factor" as a rough measure of the influence of scientists they’re considering supporting. [br] The expression the cream of the crop in Paragraph 3 most likely means "________".
选项
A、the most of all
B、the best of all
C、the recently released
D、the widely spread
答案
B
解析
the cream of the crop是英文俚语,意思为“(某物的)精华”,也就是“最好的”,因此选B项。A项“最多的”、C项“最新发布的”和D项“广泛传播的”均不符合要求。故排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3919096.html
相关试题推荐
Theamazingsuccessofmanasa【C1】________istheresultoftheevolutionary
Theamazingsuccessofmanasa【C1】________istheresultoftheevolutionary
Theamazingsuccessofmanasa【C1】________istheresultoftheevolutionary
Theamazingsuccessofmanasa【C1】________istheresultoftheevolutionary
Theamazingsuccessofmanasa【C1】________istheresultoftheevolutionary
Theamazingsuccessofmanasa【C1】________istheresultoftheevolutionary
Theamazingsuccessofmanasa【C1】________istheresultoftheevolutionary
Theamazingsuccessofmanasa【C1】________istheresultoftheevolutionary
Theamazingsuccessofmanasa【C1】________istheresultoftheevolutionary
Theamazingsuccessofmanasa【C1】________istheresultoftheevolutionary
随机试题
(1)Thewinnertakesall,asiswidelysupposedincomputingcircles.Indeed,
WriteonANSWERSHEETTWOacompositionof200wordsonthefollowingtopic:
Whatisthepassagemainlyabout?[br]Whichofthefollowingstatementsabout"
可以翻转肾上腺素的升压作用的是A:M受体阻断药 B:N受体阻断药 C:β受体
电力系统穿越功率较小的场合适用于外桥接线。()
早期发现宫颈癌最简单而最重要的方法是A、子宫颈黏液检查 B、诊断性刮宫 C、
顾某乘坐某公司长途客车从山东前往河南,在途中其随身携带的手机被他人秘密窃取,等
影响乳剂稳定性的因素包括A.乳化剂的性质与用量 B.分散相的浓度 C.乳化及
根据《物权法》,建筑区划内不能直接界定为业主共有部分的是()。A.电梯间 B.
破伤风患者的治疗原则是A.预防和抢救休克 B.早期行气管切开术 C.高压氧治
最新回复
(
0
)