首页
登录
职称英语
For nearly a century, two United States governmental agencies, the United St
For nearly a century, two United States governmental agencies, the United St
游客
2025-01-19
22
管理
问题
For nearly a century, two United States governmental agencies, the United States Army Corps of Engineers and the Bureau of Reclamation, have constructed dams to store water and to generate electricity. Building these dams provided cheap electricity, created jobs for workers, stimulated regional economic development, and allowed farming on lands that would otherwise be too dry. But not everyone agrees that big dam projects are entirely beneficial. Their storage reservoirs stop the flow of rivers and often submerge towns, farms, and historic sites. They prevent fish migrations and change aquatic habitats essential for native species.
The tide may have turned, in fact, against dam building. In 1998 the Army Corps announced that it would no longer be building large dams. In the few remaining sites where dams might be built, public opposition is so great that getting approval for projects is unlikely. Instead, the new focus may be on removing existing dams and restoring natural habitats. In 1999 Bruce Babbitt, the then United States interior secretary, said, —Of the 75,000 large dams in the United States, most were built a long time ago and are now
obsolete
and unsafe. They were built with no consideration of the environmental costs. As operating licenses come up for renewal, dam removal and habitat restoration to original stream flows will be among the options considered.
The first active hydroelectric dam in the United States to be removed against the wishes of its owners was the 162-year-old Edwards Dam, on the Kennebec River in Augusta, Maine. For many years, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service had advocated the removal of this dam, which prevented migration of salmon, shad, sturgeon, and other fish species up the river. In a precedent-setting decision, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ordered the dam removed after concluding that the environmental and economic benefits of a free-flowing river outweighed the electricity generated by the dam. In July 1999 the dam was removed and restoration work began on wetlands and stream banks long underwater.
The next dams likely to be taken down are the Elwha and Glines Dams on the Elwha River in Olympic National Park in the state of Washington. Built nearly a century ago to provide power to lumber and paper mills in the town of Port Angeles, these dams blocked access to upstream spawning beds for six species of salmon on what once was one of the most productive salmon rivers in the world. Simply removing the dams will not restore the salmon, however. Where 50-kilogram king salmon once fought their way up waterfalls to lay their eggs in gravel beds, there now are only concrete walls holding back still water and deep beds of muddy deposits. Removing the mud, uncovering gravel beds where fish spawn, and finding suitable salmon types to rebuild the population is a daunting task. Congress will have to appropriate somewhere around $300 to $400 million to remove these two relatively small dams and rehabilitate the area.
Environmental groups, encouraged by these examples, have begun to talk about much more ambitious projects. Four giant dams on the Snake River in Washington State, for example, might be removed to restore salmon and steelhead fish runs to the headwaters of the Columbia River. The Hetch Hetchy Dam in Yosemite National Park might be taken down to reveal what John Muir, the founder of the prestigious environmental organization Sierra Club, called a valley—just as beautiful and worthy of preservation as the majestic Yosemite. Some groups have even suggested removing the Glen Canyon Dam on the Colorado River. In each of these cases, powerful interests stand in opposition. These dams generate low-cost electricity and store water that is needed for agriculture and industry. Local economies, domestic water supplies, and certain types of recreation all would be severely impacted by destruction of these dams. [br] According to Paragraph 4, why would removing the Elwha and Glines dams not be enough to restore salmon to the Elwha River?
选项
A、They are not the only dams on the Elwha River.
B、The lumber and paper mills in Port Angeles also block access to upstream spawning beds.
C、Too many species of salmon are competing for survival in one river.
D、The dams have left the river’s spawning beds in an unusable condition.
答案
D
解析
根据第4段最后两句可推测有三个主要原因:一是河床都是淤泥、恢复其原貌很困难:二是寻找合适的鲑鱼种类;三是恢复生态环境。D项对应原因一,为正确答案。A、B、C三项在文中均未被提及,故都予以排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3918986.html
相关试题推荐
In1870,theUnitedStatesBureauoftheCensusofficiallydistinguishedthenat
Theoceanbottom—aregionnearly2.5timesgreaterthanthetotallandarea
Theoceanbottom—aregionnearly2.5timesgreaterthanthetotallandarea
Theoceanbottom—aregionnearly2.5timesgreaterthanthetotallandarea
TheUnitedStatesFoodandDrugAdministrationhasshownitselftobeparticular
AcenturyaftertheGerman-bornscientistformulatedhisfamoustheoryofrelati
NearlyeveryoneinBritainwouldliketoowntheirownhomeand,whethertheydo
OfalltheemployedworkersintheUnitedStates,12.5millionarepartofa
OfalltheemployedworkersintheUnitedStates,12.5millionarepartofa
OfalltheemployedworkersintheUnitedStates,12.5millionarepartofa
随机试题
WhichofthefollowingisNOTthefunctionoflanguage?A、Metalingualfunction.B
4Ω电阻、1H电感和1F电容串联二阶电路的零输入响应属于()情况。A.过
审计人员对被审计单位的材料采购业务进行实质性测试,审查的内容有()。A.材
下列哪项是“方从法出”的含义A.方剂体现治法 B.先有法后有方 C.根据治法
A.肠产毒型大肠埃希菌B.肠致病型大肠埃希菌C.肠侵袭型大肠埃希菌D.肠出血型大
“搭便车”现象是对下列各项中( )的一种形象的比喻。A.社会福利问题 B.市
关于模板支架刚度验算要求的说法错误的有()。A.梁的底模板荷载组合需要考虑混凝
为了达到大城市中心职能疏解的目的,往往需在城市的部分重点地区新建一些反磁力中心的
职业健康安全技术措施是以预防工伤事故为目的,应包括()。A.防护装置 B.保险
某安装公司承接一高层商务楼的通风空调安装工程,该商务楼位于沿海城市的闹市中心,周
最新回复
(
0
)