首页
登录
职称英语
For nearly a century, two United States governmental agencies, the United St
For nearly a century, two United States governmental agencies, the United St
游客
2025-01-19
22
管理
问题
For nearly a century, two United States governmental agencies, the United States Army Corps of Engineers and the Bureau of Reclamation, have constructed dams to store water and to generate electricity. Building these dams provided cheap electricity, created jobs for workers, stimulated regional economic development, and allowed farming on lands that would otherwise be too dry. But not everyone agrees that big dam projects are entirely beneficial. Their storage reservoirs stop the flow of rivers and often submerge towns, farms, and historic sites. They prevent fish migrations and change aquatic habitats essential for native species.
The tide may have turned, in fact, against dam building. In 1998 the Army Corps announced that it would no longer be building large dams. In the few remaining sites where dams might be built, public opposition is so great that getting approval for projects is unlikely. Instead, the new focus may be on removing existing dams and restoring natural habitats. In 1999 Bruce Babbitt, the then United States interior secretary, said, —Of the 75,000 large dams in the United States, most were built a long time ago and are now
obsolete
and unsafe. They were built with no consideration of the environmental costs. As operating licenses come up for renewal, dam removal and habitat restoration to original stream flows will be among the options considered.
The first active hydroelectric dam in the United States to be removed against the wishes of its owners was the 162-year-old Edwards Dam, on the Kennebec River in Augusta, Maine. For many years, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service had advocated the removal of this dam, which prevented migration of salmon, shad, sturgeon, and other fish species up the river. In a precedent-setting decision, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ordered the dam removed after concluding that the environmental and economic benefits of a free-flowing river outweighed the electricity generated by the dam. In July 1999 the dam was removed and restoration work began on wetlands and stream banks long underwater.
The next dams likely to be taken down are the Elwha and Glines Dams on the Elwha River in Olympic National Park in the state of Washington. Built nearly a century ago to provide power to lumber and paper mills in the town of Port Angeles, these dams blocked access to upstream spawning beds for six species of salmon on what once was one of the most productive salmon rivers in the world. Simply removing the dams will not restore the salmon, however. Where 50-kilogram king salmon once fought their way up waterfalls to lay their eggs in gravel beds, there now are only concrete walls holding back still water and deep beds of muddy deposits. Removing the mud, uncovering gravel beds where fish spawn, and finding suitable salmon types to rebuild the population is a daunting task. Congress will have to appropriate somewhere around $300 to $400 million to remove these two relatively small dams and rehabilitate the area.
Environmental groups, encouraged by these examples, have begun to talk about much more ambitious projects. Four giant dams on the Snake River in Washington State, for example, might be removed to restore salmon and steelhead fish runs to the headwaters of the Columbia River. The Hetch Hetchy Dam in Yosemite National Park might be taken down to reveal what John Muir, the founder of the prestigious environmental organization Sierra Club, called a valley—just as beautiful and worthy of preservation as the majestic Yosemite. Some groups have even suggested removing the Glen Canyon Dam on the Colorado River. In each of these cases, powerful interests stand in opposition. These dams generate low-cost electricity and store water that is needed for agriculture and industry. Local economies, domestic water supplies, and certain types of recreation all would be severely impacted by destruction of these dams. [br] According to Paragraph 1, building dams was beneficial in each of the following ways EXCEPT________.
选项
A、increasing the amount of land that could be used for farming
B、strengthening local economies
C、increasing the availability of low-cost electricity
D、expanding the aquatic habitats of native species
答案
D
解析
第1段第2句提到水坝提供了廉价的电力,而水坝建造增加了就业机会,刺激了区域经济发展,使得原本干旱的土地也可以耕种了,因此A项“耕地面积增加”、B项“促进当地经济”和C项“提供更多廉价的电力”均是水坝的利处。另外,该段最后一句提到水库阻碍了鱼类迁徙、改变了当地物种赖以生存的水生栖息地,因此D项“扩大本地物种的水生环境”与文中表述不符,且不是水坝建造的益处,符合题意,故选。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3918980.html
相关试题推荐
TheUnitedNationshadastrong________towagingawarinIraq.A、objectB、object
Successinthetalkswillreinforcehisreputationasaninternationalstatesman
OnethirdoftheChineseintheUnitedStatesliveinCalifornia,mostlyinthe
TheIntergovernmentalPanelonClimateChange(IPCC)wassetupin1988toa
TheIntergovernmentalPanelonClimateChange(IPCC)wassetupin1988toa
TheIntergovernmentalPanelonClimateChange(IPCC)wassetupin1988toa
TheIntergovernmentalPanelonClimateChange(IPCC)wassetupin1988toa
TheIntergovernmentalPanelonClimateChange(IPCC)wassetupin1988toa
TheIntergovernmentalPanelonClimateChange(IPCC)wassetupin1988toa
IntheUnitedStates,LouisComfortTiffany(1843—1933)wasthemostnotedexpon
随机试题
Whoistheinstructionfor?[originaltext]Attention,please.Nextweek’sshi
[originaltext]Whatisthedifferencebetweenlovingdisciplineandchildab
Hecouldnotarriveontime,and__________(不得不再安排一次约定会面)withthedentist.hadto
TheWorldoftheFlat-footedFlyGeorgePoinarhasbeenfasc
故障管理的功能包括:()、建立和维护差错日志并进行分析。A.通知用户 B.
隧道爆破周边炮眼痕迹保存率对于软岩应满足()。A.>50% B.>70%
A.宫腔组织病理报告"绒毛上皮细胞增生,绒毛间质水肿,血管消失" B.子宫切除
特定对象以资产认购而取得的上市公司股份,自股份发行结束之日起()个月内不得转
对于基金交易费,以下说法不正确的是( )。A.基金交易费是指基金在进行证券买卖
医务人员对患者的态度首先会成为A.影响对症状评价的因素 B.影响求医行为的因素
最新回复
(
0
)