首页
登录
职称英语
In 1965, America’s big companies had a hell of a year. The stock market was
In 1965, America’s big companies had a hell of a year. The stock market was
游客
2025-01-12
19
管理
问题
In 1965, America’s big companies had a hell of a year. The stock market was booming. Sales were rising briskly, profit margins were fat, and corporate profits as a percentage of GDP were at an all-time high. Almost half a century later, some things look much the same: big American companies have had a hell of a year, with the stock market soaring, margins strong, and profits hitting a new all-time high. But there’s one very noticeable difference. In 1965, CEOs at big companies earned on average about 20 times as much as their typical employee. These days, CEOs earn about 270 times as much.
That huge gap between the top and the middle is the result of a boom in executive compensation, which rose 876 per cent between 1978 and 2011. In response, we’ve had a host of regulatory reforms designed to curb executive pay. The latest of these is a rule, unveiled by the SEC last month, requiring companies to disclose the ratio of the CEO’s pay to that of the median worker. The idea is that, once the disparity is made public, companies will be less likely to award outsized pay packages.
Faith in disclosure has been crucial to the regulation of executive pay since the 1930s. More recently, rules have made companies detail the size and the structure of compensation packages and have enforced transparency about the kinds of comparisons they rely on to determine salaries. The result is that shareholders today know far more about CEO compensation than ever before. There’s only one problem: even as companies are disclosing more and more, executive pay keeps going up and up.
This isn’ t a coincidence: the drive for transparency has actually helped fuel the spiralling salaries. For one thing, it gives executives a good idea of how much they can get away with asking for. A more crucial reason, though, has to do with the way boards of directors set salaries. As Charles Elson and Craig Ferrere write, boards at most companies use what’ s called " peer benchmarking. " They look at the CEO salaries at peer-group firms, and then peg their CEO’s pay to the 50th, 75th, or 90th percentile of the peer group—never lower. This leads to the so-called Lake Wobegon effect: every CEO gets treated as above average. "Relying on peer-group comparisons, the way boards do, mathematically guarantees that pay is going to go up," Elson told me.
On top of this, peer-group comparisons aren’ t always honest: boards can be too cozy with CEOs and may tweak the comparisons to justify overpaying. A recent study shows that boards tend to include as peers companies that are bigger than they are and that pay CEOs more. The system is skewed by so-called "leapfroggers," the few CEOs in a given year who, whether by innate brilliance or by dumb luck, end up earning astronomical salaries. Those big paydays reset the baseline expectations for everyone else.
This isn’t just an American problem. Nor is it primarily a case of boards being helplessly in thrall to a company’ s executives. Boards are far more independent of management than they used to be, and it’s notable that a CEO hired from outside a company—typically gets 20 to 25 per cent more than an inside candidate. The real issues are subtler, though no less insidious. Some boards remain convinced of what Elson calls "superstar theory": they think that CEOs can work their magic anywhere, and must be overpaid to stay. In addition, Elson said, "if you pay below average, it makes it look as if you’d hired a below-average CEO, and what board wants that?"
Transparent pricing has perverse effects in other fields. In a host of recent cases, public disclosure of the prices that hospitals charge for various procedures has ended up driving prices up rather than down. And the psychological causes in both situations seem similar. We tend to be uneasy about bargaining in situations where the stakes are very high: do you want the guy doing your neurosurgery, or running your company, to be offering discounts? Better, in the event that something goes wrong, to be able to tell yourself that you spent all you could. And overspending is always easier when you’ re spending someone else’ s money. Corporate board members are disbursing shareholder funds; most patients have insurance to foot the bill.
Sunlight is supposed to be the best disinfectant. But there’ s something naive about the new SEC rule, which presumes that full disclosure will embarrass companies enough to restrain executive pay. As Elson told me, "People who can ask to be paid a hundred million dollars are beyond embarrassment. " More important, as long as the system for setting pay is broken, more disclosure makes things worse instead of better. We don’t need more information. We need boards of directors to step up and set pay themselves, instead of outsourcing the job to their peers. The rest of us don’ t get to live in Lake Wobegon. CEOs shouldn’t, either. [br] According to the passage, the rapid increase in executive compensation______.
选项
A、is solidly based on their contribution to companies’ development
B、leads to the huge disparity between the top and the middle in income
C、should be immediately stopped under regulatory reforms
D、will play a more important role in promoting company’s profit margins
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3909589.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]London,theUnitedKingdomTheUKhousingmarketisseeinga
[originaltext]London,theUnitedKingdomTheUKhousingmarketisseeinga
Americaissaidtohavethemostsuccessfuleconomicsysteminhistory.But
Economicgrowthisup.Unemploymentisdown.Thehousingmarketisinrecove
Economicgrowthisup.Unemploymentisdown.Thehousingmarketisinrecove
Economicgrowthisup.Unemploymentisdown.Thehousingmarketisinrecove
In1965,America’sbigcompanieshadahellofayear.Thestockmarketwas
In1965,America’sbigcompanieshadahellofayear.Thestockmarketwas
In1965,America’sbigcompanieshadahellofayear.Thestockmarketwas
In1965,America’sbigcompanieshadahellofayear.Thestockmarketwas
随机试题
Adviceto"sleeponit"couldbewellfounded,scientistssay.Afteragood
【教学过程】 环节一:谜语导入 【提出问题】“说是宝,真是宝,动物植物离不了,看不见,摸不着,越往高处越稀少”谜底是什么? 【学生回答】空气。
设备信息查看一般分为设备查看、分类查看、分区查看三种方式。
下列做法中,不符合信贷档案管理原则和要求的是()。A.将一个信贷项目形成的文
下列关于划分产品或服务风险等级时应考虑的因素说法,错误的是()。A.经营机
小学四年级的小伟每次考试都十分紧张,明明平时可以做对的题目在考试中总是出错。小伟
1922年7月,中国共产党第二次全国代表大会制定了 A.同中国国民党建立统一战
鉴别原发性醛固酮增多症与失钾性肾病的试验是 A.高渗盐水试验B.水利尿试验C.
()是指证券所代表的权利本来不存在,而是随着证券的制作而产生,即权利的发生是以证
商店里花布的米数是白布的2倍,如果每天卖30米白布和40米花布,几天后,白布全
最新回复
(
0
)