首页
登录
职称英语
A major study of the grocery-buying habits of millions of Americans released
A major study of the grocery-buying habits of millions of Americans released
游客
2025-01-11
26
管理
问题
A major study of the grocery-buying habits of millions of Americans released late last year found that people using food stamps generally make the same unhealthy food choices as everyone else in America. Too many sweets, salty snacks and prepared desserts, junk food, in other words. But when it came to soda and its sugary ilk, the results were more surprising, and not in a good way. According to the USDA-funded study, shoppers using food stamps spent a larger share of their budget—9.25% to be exact—on sugar-sweetened beverages than other shoppers. Even more startling: Food-stamp shoppers bought more soda than any other single grocery item.
The new data revived an old debate about banning soda from the $71-billion food-stamp program. In February, the House Agriculture Committee held a hearing to gather testimony about the pros and cons of such a restriction. It does seem counterproductive to spend billions of taxpayer dollars in an effort to improve the nutrition of low-income Americans on a product with little or no nutritional value. It is called the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, after all. And soda had been identified as one of the prime culprits in soaring U.S. obesity and Type 2 diabetes rates.
The study and committee debate raised some of the same uncomfortable issues that have caused the proposal to languish in the past. On the conservative side, folks have worried that this type of nannystate regulation will lead to other heavy-handed health-related restrictions. Liberals, meanwhile, have been concerned that it is patronizing and punitive to tell people how to spend their government benefits. Add in the opposition from beverage industry lobby and it’s no surprise this idea hasn’t gotten very far when it’s been proposed. In recent years, a handful of states and cities have tried to impose such a requirement, but were blocked by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
The difference now is that the attitude toward soda has rapidly soured as more evidence has poured in that beverages with added sugars are making people fat and sick. The USDA has issued dietary guidelines warning people to limit their consumption of food with added sugars, the largest sources of which are sweetened beverages. This belief helped San Francisco, Philadelphia and handful of other cities push through new taxes on soda. A handful more are considering their own soda levies.
We know that there are detrimental health effects of drinking lots of soda, but we don’t know if barring SNAP recipients from spending their benefits on soda will really improve their health. It’ s worth finding out by undertaking a limited pilot program, regardless of the qualms we may have about imposing restraints on the poor that better-off Americans don’t face. The assumption is that those billions of dollars not going to buy Coke will be spent on healthier food. But that may not be the case. What if consumption of other sugary items increases? Or if SNAP recipients simply transferred their sweet drink habit ounce-for-ounce to more expensive and still sugar-laden fruit juice? Or if they spent their non-SNAP money on soda? Before making a permanent change, we need to know if it would improve nutrition or be pointlessly punitive.
But it is a good step to take to gather data. And the argument that it would be too hard on grocers to carve out sugary drinks doesn’t hold water. As the study shows, modern grocery check stand technology is sophisticated enough to easily separate out purchases by UPC code. Indeed, SNAP already comes with restrictions on alcohol, tobacco and hot foods. Grocers don’t have a problem sorting them out. The Women, Infant and Children food-assistance program is even more prescriptive, permitting only specific items to be purchased: milk, cheese, cereal and formula, for example, but absolutely nothing with added sugar or artificial sweetener. Ideally, a pilot program would also find ways to improve access to safe drinking water. Denying poor people the ability to use food aid to buy a Coke on a hot day may raise some unsettling questions. Yet the findings in the USDA’s study about excessive soda consumption shouldn’t be ignored. [br] Which of the following CANNOT be true about the SNAP?
选项
A、It is a government program involving the distribution of $71-billion food-stamps.
B、It has restrictions on the purchase of alcohol, tobacco and hot foods.
C、It targets at the American population of obesity and Type 2 diabetes patients.
D、It triggers heated argument about the use of food-stamps to purchase soda.
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3908100.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]SentenceNo.1Australiahasmillionsofsheep.Theysaytherear
[originaltext]SentenceNo.1Australiahasmillionsofsheep.Theysaytherear
[originaltext]SentenceNo.1Australiahasmillionsofsheep.Theysaytherear
Americanstodayhavedifferenteatinghabitsthantheyhadinthepast.Ther
Americanstodayhavedifferenteatinghabitsthantheyhadinthepast.Ther
Americanstodayhavedifferenteatinghabitsthantheyhadinthepast.Ther
Americanstodayhavedifferenteatinghabitsthantheyhadinthepast.Ther
Americanstodayhavedifferenteatinghabitsthantheyhadinthepast.Ther
Americanstodayhavedifferenteatinghabitsthantheyhadinthepast.Ther
Americanstodayhavedifferenteatinghabitsthantheyhadinthepast.Ther
随机试题
Thenewmoviewearegoingtoseethisevening______(据说是基于一次真实事件).issaidtob
[originaltext]Easterisamixofthreetraditions:Pagan,HebrewandChrist
壮族(theZhuangethnicminority)是中国人口最多的少数民族,约有1900万人。Withapopulationofabout1
基金业绩评价对于个人投资者而言,投资业绩的好坏可能会决定他们是否有足够的钱来支付
对于胃痛的基本病机,下列描述正确的是A.肝郁脾虚,肝气犯胃 B.胃气阻滞,胃失
左边给定的是纸盒的外表面,右边哪一项能由它折叠而成? A.如图所示 B.如图
血尿酸增高而尿尿酸降低见于A.慢性肾功能不全 B.肾前性急性肾功能不全 C.
散在湿性啰音,伴有哮鸣音呼气相延长A.支气管哮喘 B.支气管扩张 C.慢性支
输电线路跨越三级弱电线路(不包括光缆和埋地电缆)时,输电线路与弱电线路的交叉角应
板桩码头建筑物的优点是()等。A.结构简单 B.板桩抗弯能力小 C.工程造
最新回复
(
0
)