2. 职称英语
  3. One argument used to support the idea that employment will continue to be the

One argument used to support the idea that employment will continue to be the

游客2025-01-08  26
问题    One argument used to support the idea that employment will continue to be the dominant form of work, and that employment will eventually become available for all who want it, is that working time will continue to fall. People in jobs will work fewer hours in the day, fewer days in the week, fewer weeks in the year, and fewer years in a lifetime, than they do now. This will mean that more jobs will be available for more people. This, it is said, is the way we should set about restoring full employment.
   There is no doubt that something of this kind will happen. The shorter working week, longer holidays, earlier retirement, job-sharing -- these and other ways of reducing the amount of time people spend on their jobs -- are certainly likely to spread. A mix of part-time paid work and part-time unpaid work is likely to become a much more common work pattern than today, and a flexi-life pattern of work -- involving paid employment at certain stages of life, but not at others -- will become widespread. But it is surely unrealistic to assume that this will make it possible to restore full employment as the dominant form of work.
   In the first place, so long as employment remains the overwhelmingly important form of work and source of income for most people that it is today, it is very difficult to see how reductions in employees’ working time can take place on a scale sufficiently large and at a pace sufficiently fast to make it possible to share out the available paid employment to everyone who wants it. Such negotiations as there have recently been, for example in Britain and Germany, about the possibility of introducing a 35-hour working week, have highlighted some of the difficulties. But, secondly, if changes of this kind were to take place at a pace and on a scale sufficient to make it possible to share employment among all who wanted it, the resulting situation --in which most people would not be working in their jobs for more than two or three short days a week -- could hardly continue to be one in which employment was still regarded as the only truly valid form of work. There would be so many people spending so much of their time on other activities, including other forms of useful work, that the primacy of employment would be bound to be called into question, at least to some extent. [br] The author uses the negotiations in Britain and Germany as an example to
选项 A、support reductions in employees’ working time.
B、indicate employees are unwilling to share jobs.
C、prove the possibility of sharing paid employment.
D、show that employment will lose its dominance.
答案 B
解析 作者在第三段中使用了英国和德国作为例子，在此之前，他认为it is very difficult to see  how  reductions  in  employees’working time can take place on a scale sufficiently large and at a pace sufficiently fast to make it possible to share out the available paid employment to everyone who wants it，而英、德的例子正是说明了这样一些困难，也就是说，让有工作的人放弃他赖以生活的工作机会而让别人分享在目前是不可能实现的。所以答案是B。当然，该答案是我们推理后得到的。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3903334.html
相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)