首页
登录
职称英语
[originaltext] Formula One is under fire again. The safety debate is ragin
[originaltext] Formula One is under fire again. The safety debate is ragin
游客
2025-01-06
11
管理
问题
Formula One is under fire again.
The safety debate is raging a consequence of volunteer official Graham Beveridge’s death during the Australian Grand prix in Melbourne this month.
It is a debate the sport is well used to: It began with Jackie Stewart in the late 1960s. It reappeared in 1994 with the deaths of Ayrton Senna and Roland Ratzenberger on one terrible weekend at Imola.
This time however, the focus has changed--Beveridge was not a driver, but a volunteer official. And the concern now is not how to protect the sports stars, but to ensure the safety of the thousands of people who line the track at each race.
The grand prix authorities and teams have spent billions of dollars ever the past two decades trying to make drivers invincible to any accident, no matter what the speed. Today’s drivers are cocooned in a bulletproof shell, which, judging by the four heavy crashes in Melbourne, means they can survive even the worst - looking incident.
However, according to some respected members of the grand prix stable, the sense of security that drivers now feel may be the very reason there were so many serious crashes in Australia. They increased the threat to marshals and spectators.
And quicker speed can only make it increasingly dangerous for spectators and officials, particularly at the older circuits where more compromises are made on from where in the speedway they will watch.
Max Mosley, president of the Federation International Automobile (FIA), has already admitted that, because of the newly rejoined "tyre war" between Bridgestone and Michelin, speeds have increased too much.
Mosley has promised further actions to force speeds down, but now may be the moment for the FIA to tackle one of grand prix racing’s most controversial topics: engines. Since 1994, engine power has been allowed to edge upwards without any rule restrictions. In an effort to attract more major car manufacturers into the sport, the current rules permit- ting three-litre V10 cylinder engines have been guaranteed until 2007.
There is, however, a growing feeling in that these 820-- horsepower engines should be replaced by high-revving 25 -litre V6 -cylinder milts, which would add more than four seconds a lap to current times. All agree that Mosley has a delicate balancing act to perform during the next few weeks. Should there be any more incidents in Malaysia or Brazil, the next two world championship rounds, the cries for change may grow louder.
选项
A、further actions to force speeds up
B、further actions to force speeds down
C、no further actions to force speeds up
D、no further actions to force speeds down
答案
B
解析
A进一步采取行动迫使速度提高;B.进一步采取行动迫使速度降低,与A正相反。有原文,故选B;C.不进一步采取行动迫使速度提高;D不采取进一步的强制性行动来降低速度。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3900938.html
相关试题推荐
Mikebegantoplaybaseballat______.[originaltext]INTERVIEWER:Onthematter
Mike______thatplayingbaseballisalifetimecareer.[originaltext]INTERVIEWE
[originaltext]A:Goodmorning,Mr.Pitt.Dositdown.B:Thankyou.A:Firstof
[originaltext]A:Goodmorning,Mr.Pitt.Dositdown.B:Thankyou.A:Firstof
[originaltext]Atwenty-threedaysearchoperationthatbeginsThursdaywill
[originaltext]VoiceOne:MayoisoneofthewildestofIreland’scounties.I
[originaltext]VoiceOne:MayoisoneofthewildestofIreland’scounties.I
[originaltext]Schoolgoverningorganizationsinthreestatesandthenation’
[originaltext]Martin:Hithere,Pat.Howareyou?Pat:Fine,thanks,Martin.I
[originaltext]Martin:Hithere,Pat.Howareyou?Pat:Fine,thanks,Martin.I
随机试题
[originaltext]Peter:(19)ThelawontaxisisveryinterestingandIknowinLon
What’sthenewsabout?[br][originaltext]Whenyouheartheword"biodegrada
Newpressureoncollegestodisclosegraduates’earningsJoy
[originaltext][22]Britishpolicesayasecondmanhasbeenarrestedinconn
二巯丙醇用于解救()A:汞中毒 B:三唑仑中毒 C:有机磷中毒 D:氰化
患者,男性,20岁。反复排黏液稀便和血便1年,行纤维结肠镜检发现全结肠和直肠遍布
某钢管桩外径为0.90m,壁厚为20mm,桩端进入密实中砂持力层2.5m,桩端
广泛用于非贸易结算,或贸易从属费用的收款的托收方式为()。A.光票托收
某医生用甲药治疗某病患者13例,治愈8人;乙药治疗11例,治愈3人,比较两种药物
《建设工程质量管理条例》规定,施工单位未对建筑材料、建筑构(配)件、设备和商品混
最新回复
(
0
)