Behind the brewing war over protecting patients’ records in an age of HMOs and

游客2024-12-31 19

问题 Behind the brewing war over protecting patients’ records in an age of HMOs and online medicine.
  Technology is a two-edged sword. Rarely is this as clear as it is in the realm of health care. Technology allows doctors to test their patients for generic defects--and then to turn around and spread the results throughout the world via the Internet. For someone in need of treatment, that’s good news. But for someone in search of a job or an insurance policy, the ridings can be all bad.
  Last week President Bill Clinton proposed a corollary to the patients’ bill of rights now before Congress: a right to medical privacy. Beginning In 2002, under rules set to become law in February, patients would be able to stipulate the conditions under which their personal medical data could be divulged. They would be able to examine their records and make corrections. They could learn who else had seen the information. Improper use of records by a caregiver or insurer could result in both civil and criminal penalties. The plan was, said Clinton, "an unprecedented step toward putting Americans back in control of their own medical records."
  While the administration billed the rules as an attempt to strike a balance between the needs of consumers and those of the health-care industry, neither doctors nor insurance companies were happy. The doctors said the rides could actually erode privacy, pointing to a prevision allowing managed-care plans to use personal in- formation without consent if the purpose was "health-care operations." That, physicians said, was a loophole through which HMOs and other insurers could pry into the doctor-patient relationship, in the name of assessing the quality of care. Meanwhile, the insurers protested that the rules would make them vulnerable to lawsuits. They were especially disturbed by a provision holding them liable for privacy breaches by "business partners" such as lawyers and accountants. Both groups agreed that privacy protections would drive up the cost of health care by at least an additional $ 3.8 billion, and maybe much more, over the next five years. They also complained about the increased level of federal scrutiny required by the new rules’ enforcement provisions.
  One aim of the rules is to reassure patients about confidentiality, thereby encouraging them to be open with their doctors. Today various cancers and sexually transmitted diseases can go untreated because patients are afraid of embarrassment or of losing insurance coverage. The fear is real: Clinton aides noted that a January poll by Princeton Survey Research Associates found that one in six U.S. adults had at some time done something unusual to conceal medical information, such as paying cash for services.  [br] From the article we can learn that

选项 A、American government will tighten its control over the use of patients’ personal information
B、doctors and insurers are both against the rules for the same reasons
C、patients are entitled to have complete control of their medical information
D、the new rules put insurers in a very disadvantageous position

答案 D

解析细节题。文章中提到保险公司的反对意见时，引用了保险公司的说法：the rules would make them vulnerable to lawsuits. 由此可见答案应该是D。A项中提出的政府加强对病人私人信息的控制的说法是不正确的，因为保险公司抗议的是政府要加强对法规实施情况的审查(the increased level of federal scrutiny required by the new rules enforcement provisions)。

转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3892777.html

相关试题推荐

随机试题

最新回复(0)

Behind the brewing war over protecting patients’ records in an age of HMOs and

Shoulddoctorseverlietobenefittheirpatients--tospeedrecoveryortoco

[originaltext]Interviewer:Richard,you’reoneofVirginia’spatients.Richard:

[originaltext]Interviewer:Richard,you’reoneofVirginia’spatients.Richard:

[originaltext]Interviewer:Richard,you’reoneofVirginia’spatients.Richard:

Shoulddoctorseverlietobenefittheirpatients—tospeedrecoveryortocon