首页
登录
职称英语
History buffs still wax poetic about the brutal patent battles a century ago
History buffs still wax poetic about the brutal patent battles a century ago
游客
2024-12-28
22
管理
问题
History buffs still wax poetic about the brutal patent battles a century ago between the Wright brothers and Glenn Curtis, another aviation pioneer. The current smart-phone patent war does not quite have the same romance, but it could be as important. Hardly a week passes without a new case. Motorola sued Apple this month, having itself been sued by Microsoft a few days earlier. Since 2006 the number of mobile-phone-related patent complaints has increased by 20% annually, according to Lex Machina, a firm that keeps a database of intellectual-property spats in America.
Most suits were filed by patent owners who hail from another industry, such as Kodak (a firm from a bygone era that now makes printers), or by patent trolls (firms that buy patents not in order to make products, but to sue others for allegedly infringing them). But in recent months the makers of handsets and related software themselves have become much more litigious, reports Joshua Walker, the boss of Lex Machina.
This orgy for lawyers is partly a result of the explosion of the market for smart-phones. IDC, a market-research firm, expects that 270m smart phones will be sold this year: 55% more than in 2009. "It has become worthwhile to defend one’s intellectual property," says Richard Windsor of Nomura, an investment bank.
Yet there is more than this going on. Smart phones are not just another type of handset, but fully-fledged computers, which come loaded with software and double as digital cameras and portable entertainment centers. They combine technologies from different industries, most of them patented. Given such complexity, sorting out who owns what requires time and a phalanx of lawyers.
The convergence of different industries has also led to a culture clash. When it comes to intellectual property, mobile-phone firms have mostly operated like a club. They jointly develop new technical standards: for example, for a new generation of wireless networks. They then license or swap the patents "essential" to this standard under "fair and reasonable" conditions.
Not being used to such a collectivist set-up, Apple refused to pay up, which triggered the first big legal skirmish over smart-phones. A year ago Nokia lobbed a lawsuit at Apple, alleging that its American rival’s phone infringes on a number of its "essential patents". A couple of months later, Apple returned the favour, alleging that Nokia had copied some phone features. Since then both sides have upped the ante by filing additional complaints.
Lending ferocity to this legal firefight is the fact that competition in the smart phone market is not merely about individual products, but entire platforms and operating systems. These are the infrastructures that allow other firms to develop applications, or "apps", for these devices. Should any one firm gain an important lead, it might dominate the industry for decades—just as Microsoft has dominated the market for personal-computer (PC) software.
Yet there is a difference between the smart-phone war and the earlier one over PCs. There is a new type of player: firms with opera-source platforms. Google, for instance, which makes its money from advertisements, does not charge for Android (its operating system for smart-phones) and lets others modify the software. This makes life hard for vendors of proprietary platforms, such as Apple and Microsoft.
Some expect Apple and Microsoft t0 sue Google. Yet this is unlikely, because the online giant will be hard to pin down. Google does not earn any money with Android, which makes it difficult to calculate any potential damage awards and patent royalties. The frenzy of smart-phone litigation could last for years. Litigation may also make smart-phones dearer. Mr. White of Bristol York estimates that device makers already have to pay royalties for 200—300 patents for a typical smart-phone. Patent costs are 15,20-of its selling price, or about half of what the hardware components cost. "If 50 people [each] want 2% of a device’s value, we have a problem," says Josh Lerner, a professor at Harvard Business School.
Finally, there is a danger that the current intensity of litigation will become normal. Pessimists predict an everlasting patent war, much as the wider information-technology industry seems permanently embroiled in antitrust action. The Wright brothers’ legal skirmishes were put to rest only by the outbreak of the first World war. With luck, thee smart-phone patent: battles will end more quietly. [br] We can infer from the passage that smart-phones
选项
A、will prove to be outdated and short-lived.
B、used to be unpopular with mobile phone users.
C、seem to have a huge market with great potential.
D、need to be updated with more advanced technology.
答案
C
解析
推断题。第三段首句指出过去知识产权官司的情况“Most suits were filed by patent owners who hail from another industry”,之后提到现在的状况“in recent months the makers of handsets and related software themselves have become much more litigious”,第四段首句解释了手机及相关软件制造商自身变得益发热衷诉讼的原因“This orgy for lawyers is partly a result of the explosion of the market for smart-phones.”,由此可以判断智能手机前景广阔,故[C]符合文意。文中没有提到智能手机是昙花一现,排除EA];虽然第三段开始提到过去手机制造商不热衷打知识产权官司,但不能因此推出过去人们不喜欢智能手机,因为手机更新换代很快,也可能当时根本就没有智能手机,排除[B];文中没有提到对智能手机技术方面的评论,排除[D]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3887968.html
相关试题推荐
ThefirstpresidentinU.S.historywhoresignedbecauseofascandalis______
Historybuffsstillwaxpoeticaboutthebrutalpatentbattlesacenturyago
Historybuffsstillwaxpoeticaboutthebrutalpatentbattlesacenturyago
Insixteenth-centuryItalyandeighteenth-centuryFrance,waningprosperity
Withtheconstructoroftherailwaysinthe19thcentury,anewsociological
Withtheconstructoroftherailwaysinthe19thcentury,anewsociological
Withtheconstructoroftherailwaysinthe19thcentury,anewsociological
Withtheconstructoroftherailwaysinthe19thcentury,anewsociological
TheoriesofHistoryⅠ.Howmuchweknowabouthistory?A.Writte
TheoriesofHistoryⅠ.Howmuchweknowabouthistory?A.Writte
随机试题
•Youhavetoorganiseanurgentmeetingat9a.m.tomorrowwithallthestaf
UniversitiesBranchOutA)Asneverbeforeintheirlonghistory,universi
Choosethecorrectanswer,A,BorC.Camber’sThemePark[br]Accordingtothe
Foranyonewhoissetonacareerinfashionitisnotenoughtohavesuccee
某个体经营企业,属于小规模纳税人,2018年12月列支差旅费、招待费用各4000
半夏泻心汤用于()A.胃虚有热,和降失常,症见心胸烦闷,气逆欲呕,口干喜饮
假设某基金在2012年12月3日的单位净值为1.5151元,2013年9月1日的
按照我国商业银行资产负债比例管理规定,人民币存贷款比例应小于等于()。A.7
下列哪种气体不属于刺激性气体A.二氧化硫 B.光气 C.二氧化氮 D.二氧
根据《房屋建筑与装饰工程工程量计算规范》(GB50854-2013)规定,关于钢
最新回复
(
0
)