首页
登录
职称英语
I have a plan that will raise wages, lower prices, increase the nation’s sto
I have a plan that will raise wages, lower prices, increase the nation’s sto
游客
2024-12-27
28
管理
问题
I have a plan that will raise wages, lower prices, increase the nation’s stock of scientists and engineers, and maybe even create the next Google. Better yet, this plan won’t cost the government a dime. In fact, it will save a lot of money. But few politicians are going to want to touch it. Here’s the plan: More immigration. A pathway to legal status for undocumented immigrants. And a recognition that immigration policy is economic policy, and needs to be thought of as such.
See what I meant about politicians not liking it?
Economists will tell you that immigrants raise wages for the average native-born worker. They’ll tell you that they make things cheaper for us to buy here, and that if we didn’t have immigrants for some of these jobs, the jobs would move to other countries. They’ll tell you that we should allow for much more highly skilled immigration, because that’s about as close to a free lunch as you’re likely to find. They’ll tell you that the people who should most want a path to legal status for undocumented immigrants are the low-income workers who are most opposed to such plans. And about all this, the economists are right.
There are also noneconomic considerations, of course. Integrating cultures and nationalities is difficult. Undocumented immigrants raise issues of law and fairness. Border security is important. Those questions are important. They’re just not the subject of this column.
The mistake we make when thinking about the effect immigrants have on our wages, says Giovanni Peri, an economist at the University of California at Davis who has studied the issue extensively, is we imagine an economy where the number of jobs is fixed. Then, if one immigrant comes in, he takes one of those jobs or forces a worker to accept a lower wage. But that’s not how our economy works. With more labor—particularly more labor of different kinds—the economy grows larger. It produces more stuff. There are more workers buying things and that increases the total number of jobs. We understand perfectly well that Europe is in trouble because its low birth rates mean fewer workers and that means less economic growth. We ourselves worry that we’re not graduating enough scientists and engineers. But the economy doesn’t care if it gets workers through birth rates or green cards.
In fact, there’s a sense in which green cards are superior. Economists separate new workers into two categories: Those who "substitute" for existing labor—we’re both construction workers, and the boss can easily swap you out for me; and those who "complement" existing labor—you’re a construction engineer and I’m a construction worker. Immigrants, more so than U.S.-born workers, tend to be in the second category, as the jobs you want to give to someone who doesn’t speak English very well and doesn’t have many skills are different from the jobs you give to people who are fluent and have more skills.
But that’s only half of their benefit. "Living standards are a function of two things," says Michael Greenstone, director of the Hamilton Project, which is hosting a Washington conference on the economics of immigration next week. "They’re a function of our wages and the prices of the goods we purchase. " And immigrants reduce the prices of those goods. Patricia Cortes, an economist at the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business, found that immigrants lowered the prices in "immigrant-intensive industries" like housekeeping and gardening by about 10 percent. So our wages go up and the prices of the things we want to buy go down.
We should remember, though, that the average worker isn’t every worker. A study by Harvard economists George Borjas and Lawrence Katz found that although immigrants raised native wages overall, they slightly hurt the 8 percent of workers without a high-school education and those with a college education. A subsequent study by Peri looked harder at the ways immigrant labor differed from native labor and found that all groups of workers saw a benefit from immigrants—though unskilled workers saw less of a benefit than highly skilled workers.
And unskilled workers face even tougher competition from undocumented immigrants who, because their status is so tenuous, will accept pay beneath the minimum wage. And they are unlikely to complain about safety regulations or work conditions. That takes unskilled immigrants from being a bit cheaper than unskilled natives and makes them a lot cheaper—which makes employers likelier to hire them for jobs that native workers could do better.
This suggests, first, that American workers would be better off if we figured out a way to take the 12 million undocumented immigrants and give them legal status, and second, that we might want to give them more direct help if we’re going to increase immigration. Both are possible—just politically difficult.
Our immigration policy should be primarily oriented around our national goals. And one goal is to have the world’s most innovative and dynamic economy. It’s never going to be the case that each and every one of the planet’s most talented individuals is born on American soil. But those born elsewhere could be lured here. People like living here. We should be leveraging that advantage, mercilessly roaming the globe, finding the most talented people and attracting them to our country. When we have the best talent, we have the best innovations. That’s how we landed Google, Intel, and the atomic bomb. Immigrants are about twice as likely as native-born Americans to start a small business, and they’re 30 percent more likely to apply for a patent. [br] Which of the following is NOT the benefit of immigration?
选项
A、Immigration will help the economy grow and increase the total number of jobs.
B、Immigration will increase the wages and decrease the prices of goods.
C、Immigration will make skilled native workers face even tougher competition.
D、Immigration will attract the most talented people to the country.
答案
C
解析
首先,要看清题目,找出不正确的选项。所给的三个选项A、B和D分别可从第五段、第七段和第十一段中得出均为正确的答案,而选项C与原文第九段内容不符。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3887165.html
相关试题推荐
ThenationalfloweroftheUnitedStatesis______.A、violetB、tulipC、roseD、dais
In1931,by______Canadawasformallydeclaredtobeasovereignnationandbecam
ThenationaldayofAustraliais______.A、Jan.26thB、Jan.1stC、Jan.18thD、Jan.
Adelaide,thecapitalofSouthAustralia,isinternationallyknownforits______
NewZealanderscelebratetheirnationaldayon______.A、Jan.1stB、Feb.6thC、Jun
TheflagwhichisacombinationofBritain’sthreepartsisknownasA、theUnited
Lastweekoilpricesfinallystoppedrising.Theynowhoveraround$43abar
Lastweekoilpricesfinallystoppedrising.Theynowhoveraround$43abar
Evenifpricesshootbacktoward$50abarrel,thatwon’tweantheworldfro
Evenifpricesshootbacktoward$50abarrel,thatwon’tweantheworldfro
随机试题
[originaltext]Wouldyouliketoworkhereoratourdowntownheadquarters?(A)D
与相邻房间的温差为()时,应计算通过隔墙或楼板等的传热量。A.≥6℃ B.
安全标志按其用途可分为()、警告标志、指令标志和提示标志四大类型。A.禁令
金鱼藻是一种高等沉水植物,有关研究结果如图所示(图中净光合速率是指实际光合速率与
患者男,60岁。因肝硬化并发上消化道出血,出现言语不清,举止反常,定向力和理解力
工作岗位分析对各类工作岗位所进行的系统研究,其具体研究的内容包括( )。A.
(2021年真题)医疗机构根据本单位临床需要,经批准可以配制制剂。下列符合医疗机
可能增加严重心血管疾病风险,减肥治疗的风险大于获益,已于2010年10月在我国停
P450催化的反应为( )。A.苯转化为苯酚 B.环氧化物转化为二醇化合物
根据《标准化法》的规定,按照标准的级别不同,可把标准分为()。 A.
最新回复
(
0
)