首页
登录
职称英语
The main idea of these business-school academics is appealing. In a world wh
The main idea of these business-school academics is appealing. In a world wh
游客
2024-12-21
25
管理
问题
The main idea of these business-school academics is appealing. In a world where companies must adapt to new technologies and source of competition, it is much harder than it used to be to offer good employees job security and an opportunity to climb the corporate ladder. Yet it is also more necessary than ever for employees to invest in better skills and sparkle with bright ideas. How can firms get the most out of people ff they can no longer offer them protection and promotion?
Many bosses would love to have an answer. Sumantra Ghoshal of the London Business School and Christopher Bartlett of the Harvard Business School think they have one: "Employability." If managers offer the right of training and guidance, and change their attitude towards their underlings, they will be able to reassure their employees that they will always have the skills and experience to find a good job—even ff it is with a different company.
Unfortunately, they promise more than they deliver. Their thoughts on what an ideal organization should accomplish are hard to quarrel with: encourage people to be creative, make sure the gains from creativity are shared with the pains of the business that can make the must of them, keep the organization from getting stale and so forth. The real disappointment comes when they attempt to show how firms might actually create such an environment. At its nub is the notion that companies can attain their elusive goals by changing their implicit contract with individual workers, and treating them as a source of value rather than a cog in a machine.
The authors offer a few inspiring example of companies—they include Motorola, 3M and ABB—that have managed to go some way towards mating such organizations. But they offer little useful guidance on how to go about it, and leave the biggest questions unanswered, How do you continuously train people, without diverting them from their everyday job of making the business more profitable? How do you train people to be successful elsewhere while still encouraging them to make big commitments to your own firm? How do you get your newly liberated employees to spend their time on ideas that create value, and not simply on those they enjoy? Must of their answers are platitudinous, and when they are not they are unconvincing.
选项
A、had job security and opportunity of promotion
B、had to compete with each other to keep his job
C、had to undergo training all the time
D、had no difficulty climbing the corporate ladder
答案
A
解析
本题是推理题。从第一段的句子“... it is much harder than it used to be to offer good employees job security and an opportunity to climb the corporate ladder.”可以看出,过去一个好的职员很容易获得工作保障和晋升的机会,工作上的竞争并不残酷,所以B“必须和别人竞争”不对,C“必须总是接受培训”没有提及,D故意曲解了句子的意思。因此答案应该是A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3878759.html
相关试题推荐
随机试题
[originaltext]Mostpeopleareconvincedthatthecreativepersonissomeone
FriedchipsIngredients
早期故障期,指新机械运转初期或大修后投人使用初期,故障率较低。
分隔道路上对向行驶的交通流的标线为何种颜色()。A.橙色标线 B.蓝色标
男性,60岁。心前区阵发性疼痛1个月,多在夜间发作,与活动无关。每次发作15分钟
无菌环境下配制的要素饮食,其有效时间应小于()。A.12小时 B.24小时
在某两个场地的两个钻孔内的同样深度上进行做标贯试验,用国标《建筑抗震设计规范》(
研究表明,遗忘进程是不均衡的,表现为()。 A.时快时慢 B.不快不慢 C
属于第二类疫苗的是A.省级人民政府在执行国家免疫规划时增加的疫苗 B.由公民自
房间室形指数RI为()。A.1.25B1.35;C.1.52;
最新回复
(
0
)