首页
登录
职称英语
In a windowless room on the University of California, Berkeley, campus, two
In a windowless room on the University of California, Berkeley, campus, two
游客
2024-11-29
1
管理
问题
In a windowless room on the University of California, Berkeley, campus, two undergrads are playing a Monopoly game that one of them has no chance of winning. A team of psychologists has rigged it so that skill, brains, savvy, and luck- those ingredients that ineffably combine to create success in games as in life- have been made immaterial. Here, the only thing that matters is money.
One of the players, a brown-haired guy in a striped T-shirt, has been made "rich. " He got $ 2,000 from the Monopoly bank at the start of the game and receives $ 200 each time he passes Go. The second player, a chubby young man in glasses, is comparatively impoverished. He was given $ 1,000 at the start and collects $ 100 for passing Go. T-Shirt can roll two dice, but Glasses can only roll one, limiting how fast he can advance. The students play for fifteen minutes under the watchful eye of two video cameras, while down the hall in another windowless room, the researchers huddle around a computer screen, later recording in a giant spreadsheet the subjects’ every facial twitch and hand gesture.
T-Shirt isn’t just winning; he’s crushing Glasses. Initially, he reacted to the inequality between him and his opponent with a series of smirks, an acknowledgment, perhaps, of the inherent awkwardness of the situation. "Hey," his expression seemed to say, "this is weird and unfair, but whatever." Soon, though, as he whizzes around the board, purchasing properties and collecting rent, whatever discomfort he feels seems to dissipate. He’s a skinny kid, but he balloons in size, spreading his limbs toward the far ends of the table. He smacks his playing piece(in the experiment, the wealthy player gets the Rolls-Royce)as he makes the circuit- smack, smack, smack ending his turns with a board-shuddering bang! Four minutes in, he picks up Glasses’s piece, the little elf shoe, and moves it for him. As the game nears its finish, T-Shirt moves his Rolls faster. The taunting is over now: He’s all efficiency. He refuses to meet Glasses’s gaze. His expression is stone cold as he takes the loser’s cash.
For a long time, primatologists have known that chimpanzees will act out social dominance with a special ferociousness, slapping hands, stamping feet, or "charging back and forth and dragging huge branches," as Jane Goodall once wrote. And sociologists and anthropologists have explored the effects of hierarchy in tribes and groups. But psychology has only recently begun seriously investigating how having money, that major marker of status in the modern world, affects psychosocial behavior in the species Homo sapiens. By making real people temporarily very affluent, without regard to their actual economic circumstances and within the controlled environment of a psych lab, the Berkeley researchers aim to demonstrate the potency of that one variable. "Putting someone in a role where they’re more privileged and have more power in a game makes them behave like people who actually do have more power, more money, and more status," says Paul Piff, the psychologist who designed the experiment. The Monopoly results, based on a year of watching inequitable games between pairs like Glasses and T-Shirt, have not yet been released. But Piff believes that they will support and amplify his previous provocative research.
Earlier this year, Piff, who is 30, published a paper in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences that made him semi-famous. Titled "Higher Social Class Predicts Increased Unethical Behavior," it showed through quizzes, online games, questionnaires, in-lab manipulations, and field studies that living high on the socioeconomic ladder can, colloquially speaking, dehumanize people. It can make them less ethical, more selfish, more insular, and less compassionate than other people. It can make them more likely, as Piff demonstrated in one of his experiments, to take candy from a bowl of sweets designated for children. "While having money doesn’t necessarily make anybody anything," Piff says, "the rich are way more likely to prioritize their own self-interests above the interests of other people. It makes them more likely to exhibit characteristics that we would stereotypically associate with, say, assholes."
These findings, in combination with a researcher eager to promote them, reverberated online. On message boards, detractors accused Piff of using his lab to promote a leftist agenda; that his home base was Berkeley only fueled those suspicions. Piff’s e-mail box is filled with messages calling him a "liberal idiot" and his work "junk science." "I would wager," says Wharton business-school psychologist Philip Tetlock, "that a congressional committee chair who favors redistribution of wealth would be far more likely to call these experts in as witnesses than would a committee chair who opposes redistribution."
It is easy to see Piff’s research as ideologically motivated. The point is to "shed light on some of the consequences of social class," he says. But whatever his goal is, the "results are apolitical," he says, and the data point in a clear direction. "Would I be less excited if we found that higher-status people were more generous?" he asks. "I’d probably be less excited, but that’s not what we found." [br] According to the article, a Monopoly game
选项
A、is designed by psychologists who are the only people to win the game.
B、is played by undergraduates with skills, brains, savvy and luck.
C、makes the winner rich and loser impoverished in their lives.
D、determines who will win the game at the very beginning.
答案
D
解析
细节题。由题干中的Monopoly game定位至第一段首句,其中提到“…two undergrads are playing aMonopoly game that one of them has no chance of winning.”,这句话是说两人中的一人永远没有获胜的机会,也就间接地告诉读者在游戏一开始就决定了谁胜谁负。在第三段第二句中,又提到“Initially,he reactedto the inequality between him and his opponent…”,从initially和inequality两词可以判断,游戏一开始就是不公平的,因为胜负已经事先决定了,故选[D]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3866392.html
相关试题推荐
InawindowlessroomontheUniversityofCalifornia,Berkeley,campus,two
InawindowlessroomontheUniversityofCalifornia,Berkeley,campus,two
InawindowlessroomontheUniversityofCalifornia,Berkeley,campus,two
InawindowlessroomontheUniversityofCalifornia,Berkeley,campus,two
NowadaysvisitstoprestigiousuniversitieslikePekingUniversityaregaini
ThelargestuniversityinCanadais______A、UniversityofToronto.B、McGillUniv
A:WhereisPaul?B:Somewhereinouruniversity.Inthisdialogue,B’sanswerv
Undertheincreasingpressureofhuntingjobs,alargenumberofuniversity
InawindowlessroomontheUniversityofCalifornia,Berkeley,campus,two
InawindowlessroomontheUniversityofCalifornia,Berkeley,campus,two
随机试题
[originaltext]Moreandmorepeoplearoundtheworldareusingwirelessormobil
[originaltext]SteveNicholshasawaywithbirds.ThefounderoftheUK’sN
Throughouthistorythebasicunitofalmosteveryhumansocietyhasbeenthe
生物膜的不对称性仅指膜蛋白的定向排列,膜脂可做侧向扩散和翻转扩散,在双分子层中的
某混凝土面板堆石坝建于弱风化的花岗岩上,最大坝高150m,主堆石区为花岗岩块石。
中国古代园林的特色包括有( )。A.造园艺术,师法自然 B.分隔空间,融于自
无论是清晨、中午还是傍晚,我们都会把中国的国旗看做是鲜红色的,这是知觉的(
于1967年提出社会工作价值观体系的是()。A.戈登 B.比斯台克 C.泰
根据教学中使用的主要方法划分课的种类,可分为()。 A.新授课 B.讲授课
tRNA的结构特点不包括A.含甲基化核苷酸 B.5,末端具有特殊的帽子结构
最新回复
(
0
)