首页
登录
职称英语
Give the Senate some credit: in shaping the current immigration-reform bill,
Give the Senate some credit: in shaping the current immigration-reform bill,
游客
2024-11-26
29
管理
问题
Give the Senate some credit: in shaping the current immigration-reform bill, it has come up with one idea that almost everybody hates. That’s the plan to create a new class of "guest workers"— immigrants who would be allowed to work in the U.S. for three two-year stretches, at most, provided that they return home for a year after each visit. Conservatives dislike the plan because they believe that the guest workers won’t return home after their visas expire. Liberals dislike it because they believe the program will depress American wages and trap guest workers in a state of serfdom. The only vocal supporters of the provision are businesses that rely heavily on immigrant labor, and they’re presumably just looking out for themselves.
History appears to give credence to the plan’s opponents. Think about Germany’s Gastarbeiter problem. Beginning in the early nineteen-sixties, Germany admitted immigrants from Turkey on short-term work visas. Many of these workers, instead of returning home, put down permanent roots, despite having no obvious way of becoming citizens. They were neither deported nor assimilated, and today they’re a sizable minority in many cities and, in some sense, a society unto themselves.
In the U. S. , the guest-worker experience has often been one of abuse and mistreatment, most notably during the infamous bracero program. It was started during the Second World War as a way of bringing in a small number of experienced farmworkers to harvest crops in California. But farm owners quickly came to rely on imported labor, and in time more than four hundred thousand braceros a year were crossing the border, only to end up being used as strikebreakers, forced to live in grim migrant camps, and paid less than they’d been promised.
Given this record, and the broader concerns about the effects of illegal immigration, the hostility to the new plan is understandable. It’s also misguided. However imperfect, the guest-worker program is better than any politically viable alternative. Opponents of immigration sometimes imply that adding workers to a workforce automatically brings wages down. But immigrants tend to work in different industries than native workers, and have different skills, and so they often end up complementing native workers, rather than competing with them. That can make native workers more productive and therefore better off. According to a recent study, between 1990 and 2004 immigration actually boosted the wages of most American workers. And if by increasing the number of legal guest workers we reduced the number of undocumented workers, the economy would benefit even more.
Guest workers are also, paradoxically, less likely than illegal immigrants to become permanent residents. Mexican workers, contrary to popular belief, do not, generally, intend to live their entire lives in the U.S. Instead, as the sociologists Douglas Massey and Jorge Durand concluded after a comprehensive study of immigrant attitudes and behavior, most want to work "for short periods to generate an alternative source of household income or to buy a house in Mexico.
The new guest-worker plan is not a reprise of the bracero program. Guest workers would no longer be tied to a single employer within certain limits, they’d be able to change jobs if they wanted and would be guaranteed all the protections that the law extends to native workers, including the freedom to join a union. These protections would not necessarily insure fair treatment, especially given the Bush Administration’s poor record of enforcing labor laws. But guest workers would have more by James Surowiecki rights than illegal workers, and be better treated. They’d also be paid better -better than they would as illegals, and far better than if they had to stay at home.
In fact, whatever benefits the guest-worker program brought to the U. S. economy or to particular businesses, the biggest winners would be the workers themselves. When a good made by a foreign worker enters this country, the worker gets only a tiny slice of what we pay. But when the worker himself comes into this country his earnings can rise by a factor of ten or more. But the program’s costs to American workers are negligible, the gains for the guest workers are enormous, and the U.S. economy will benefit. This is that rare option which is both sensible and politically possible. Congress should take it. [br] Guest workers should be encouraged for the following reasons EXCEPT
选项
A、they won’t compete with native workers.
B、they may benefit native workers in some way.
C、richer source of labor may low down wages.
D、they may help the society economically.
答案
C
解析
推断题。第四段第四句是作者转述反对者的论调,作者在后一句就驳斥了这个观点:“But immigrants…rather than competing with them”说明外来入境务工者不会对本国人形成竞争,继而第六句更进一步肯定他们会让本国人经济状况更好,[C]与原文表述不符,故选[C]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3861300.html
相关试题推荐
GivetheSenatesomecredit:inshapingthecurrentimmigration-reformbill,
GivetheSenatesomecredit:inshapingthecurrentimmigration-reformbill,
Currently,eachcitizencanconfirmothers’personalinformationbypayingf
WhatisthecurrentsituationofjobmarketintheUS?[br][originaltext]
WhatisthecurrentsituationofjobmarketintheUS?[originaltext](7)US
ThecurrenttitleofTracyis______.[br][originaltext]Jack(M)Tracy(W)M:Hi,
ThecurrenttitleofTracyis______.[originaltext]Jack(M)Tracy(W)M:Hi,Tracy!
Acreditcardthatonlyworkswhenithearsitsowner’svoicehasbeendevel
Acreditcardthatonlyworkswhenithearsitsowner’svoicehasbeendevel
Acreditcardthatonlyworkswhenithearsitsowner’svoicehasbeendevel
随机试题
Thenewlymarriedcouplehasn’tdecidedwhichhotel_________.A、tostayB、tosta
X为一家大型建筑企业,在保险经纪公司Y的引荐下,X与一家财产保险公司Z签订了一份
以下哪种因素与无关。()A.温度 B.外加电压 C.大气压强
A.昆仑 B.肝俞 C.承山 D.膈俞 E.委中上列腧穴中,常用于治疗头
Astudentfindsitdifficulttolearnth
(2014中)某企业从二级市场购入面值总额为800000元的公司债券,购买价款为
单母线接线的10kV系统发生单相接地后,经逐条线路试停电查找,接地现象仍不消失是
各种运输方式内外部的各个方面的构成和联系,就是( )。 A.运输系统
全过程集成化管理服务内容包括()。A.参与生产试运行及工程保修期管理 B
图示槽形截面杆,一端固定,另端自由。作用在自由端角点的外力F与杆轴线平行。该杆将
最新回复
(
0
)