首页
登录
职称英语
(1) A couple of years ago a group of management scholars from Yale and the U
(1) A couple of years ago a group of management scholars from Yale and the U
游客
2024-11-20
20
管理
问题
(1) A couple of years ago a group of management scholars from Yale and the University of Pittsburgh tried to discover if there was a link between a company’s success and the personality of its boss. To work out what that personality was, they asked senior managers to score their bosses for such traits as an ability to communicate an exciting vision of the future or to stand as a good model for others to follow. When the data were analyzed, the researchers found no evidence of a connection between how well a firm was doing and what its boss was like. As far as they could tell, a company could not be judged by its chief executive any better than a book could be judged by its cover.
(2) A few years before this, however, a team of psychologists from Tufts University, led by Nalini Ambady, discovered that when people watched two-second-long film-clips of professors lecturing, they were pretty good at determining how able a teacher each professor actually was. At the end of the study, the perceptions generated by those who had watched only the clips were found to match those of students taught by those self-same professors for a full semester.
(3) Now, Dr Ambady and her colleague, Nicholas Rule, have taken things a step further. They have shown that even a still photograph can convey a lot of information about competence—and that it can do so in a way which suggests the assessments of all those senior managers were poppycock.
(4) Dr Ambady and Mr. Rule showed 100 undergraduates the faces of the chief executives of the top 25 and the bottom 25 companies in the Fortune 1,000 list. Half the students were asked how good they thought the person they were looking at would be at leading a company and half were asked to rate five personality traits on the basis of the photograph. These traits were competence, dominance, likeability, facial maturity (in other words, did the individual have an adult-looking face or a baby-face) and trustworthiness.
(5) By a useful (though hardly unexpected) coincidence all the businessmen were male and all were white, so there were no confounding variables of race or sex. The study even controlled for age, the emotional expression in the photos and the physical attractiveness of the individuals by obtaining separate ratings of these from other students and using statistical techniques to remove their effects.
(6) This may sound like voodoo. Psychologists spent much of the 20th century denigrating the work of 19th-century physiognomists and phrenologists who thought the shapes of faces and skulls carry information about personality. However, recent work has shown that such traits can, indeed, be assessed from photographs of faces with a reasonable accuracy.
(7) And Dr Ambady and Mr. Rule were surprised by just how accurate the students’ observations were. The results of their study, which are about to be published in Psychological Science, show that both the students’ assessments of the leadership potential of the bosses and their ratings for the traits of competence, dominance and facial maturity were significantly related to a company’s profits. Moreover, the researchers discovered that these two connections were independent of each other. When they controlled for the "power" traits, they still found the link between perceived leadership and profit, and when they controlled for leadership they still found the link between profit and power.
(8) These findings suggest that instant judgments by the ignorant (nobody even recognized Warren Buffett) are more accurate than assessments made by well-informed professionals. It looks as if knowing a chief executive disrupts the ability to judge his performance.
(9) Sadly, the characteristics of likeability and trustworthiness appear to have no link to company profits, suggesting that when it comes to business success, being warm and fuzzy does not matter much (though these traits are not harmful). But this result also suggests yet another thing that stock market analysts might care to take into account when preparing their reports: the physiognomy of the chief executive. [br] Which of the following personality traits does NOT contribute to the success of a company according to Dr Ambady and Nicholas Rule’s study?
选项
A、Competence.
B、Dominance.
C、Trustworthiness.
D、Facial maturity.
答案
C
解析
最后一段第l句所说likeability与trustworthiness与公司利润似乎没有联系,可知本题答案为C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3854202.html
相关试题推荐
Managementjargoncanalienatestaffandleavebosseslookinguntrustworthy
Managementjargoncanalienatestaffandleavebosseslookinguntrustworthy
Managementjargoncanalienatestaffandleavebosseslookinguntrustworthy
Managementjargoncanalienatestaffandleavebosseslookinguntrustworthy
Managementjargoncanalienatestaffandleavebosseslookinguntrustworthy
[originaltext]Now,listentoPartOneoftheinterview.Ml:Same-sexcouplesma
[originaltext]Now,listentoPartOneoftheinterview.Ml:Same-sexcouplesma
[originaltext]Now,listentoPartOneoftheinterview.Ml:Same-sexcouplesma
(1)AcoupleofyearsagoagroupofmanagementscholarsfromYaleandtheU
(1)AcoupleofyearsagoagroupofmanagementscholarsfromYaleandtheU
随机试题
Thetreewascut______.A、downB、inC、offD、ontA树被砍倒了。cutin意为“插嘴”;cutof
投保人甲以其成年子女乙为被保险人,向X保险公司投保意外伤害保险,死亡保险金额为1
脊柱转移性肿瘤影像学上表现()。A.不会涉及椎体附件 B.多不侵及椎间盘
除家庭架构、预期寿命、退休年龄外,影响退休养老规划的因素还有很多,以下不属于影响
以下概念不正确的是A:髂棘间径:两侧髂前上棘外缘的距离 B:坐骨结节间径:两坐
(2015年真题)在会计核算的基本前提中,界定会计核算空间范围的是()。A.持
男性,30岁,劳力性呼吸困难5年,双下肢浮肿一月,少尿一周而住院,查体:血压12
根据《建设工程安全生产管理条例》,施工单位主要负责人依法对本单位的安全生产工作全
下列关于工程项目策划的论述,正确的是()。A.工程项目策划旨在为项目建设的建设和
属于项目风险评估工作的是()。A.确定风险因素 B.收集与项目风险有关的信息
最新回复
(
0
)