首页
登录
职称英语
Supreme Court justices seemed reluctant on Wednesday to disallow a type of a
Supreme Court justices seemed reluctant on Wednesday to disallow a type of a
游客
2024-11-19
22
管理
问题
Supreme Court justices seemed reluctant on Wednesday to disallow a type of agreement between employers and unions that has become increasingly important to the labor movement as it tries to grow its ranks. The case involves neutrality agreements, which a union lawyer told the court are commonly used in organizing hotel and casino workers. Under such an agreement, an employer might remain neutral during the organizing campaign and even grant the union access to company grounds or lists of employees. In return, the union might agree to give up the right to strike or throw its support to a matter important to the company.
"Many employers and unions find agreements such as this useful to avoid conflict during organizing campaigns," lawyer Richard G. McCracken told the court at Wednesday’s arguments. He represents Unite Here, a union seeking to represent employees of a Hollywood, Fla., greyhound track and casino. "They are efficient. They avoid the hard feelings that come in many contested organizing campaigns and thereby create a good environment for collective bargaining," McCracken said.
But some business organizations and right-to-work groups say businesses often are bullied into entering into such agreements. The case before the court resulted from a lawsuit brought by Martin Mulhall, who worked for the Florida Company Mardi Gras Gaming. While other federal appeals courts have upheld such agreements, the U. S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit said the neutrality agreement at issue violated a section of the Labor Management Relations Act. It forbids an employer to "pay, lend, or deliver any money or other thing of value" to a labor union seeking to organize the company’s workers. In this case, the casino allowed the union access to its employees and agreed to election rules allowing employees to vote by checking a card in front of others rather than by secret ballot. The union made concessions as well and also agreed to spend $ 100,000 to support a 2006 referendum to allow slot machines at the casino.
The labor act bans employer payments to unions to discourage bribes and corruption. McCracken argued that the "thing of value" language wasn’t meant to cover what are routine matters of collective bargaining. Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. said access to company grounds would seem like a thing of value. And Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. said he did not see how the employer’s agreement to a "card-check" election rather than secret ballot could not be seen as a benefit. "The union organizer comes up to you and says, ’Well, here’s a card. You can check I want to join the union, or two, I don’t want a union. Which will it be?’ And there’s a bunch of your fellow workers gathered around as you fill out the card." Roberts said. Deputy Solicitor General Michael R. Dreeben, arguing for the government on behalf of Unite Here, said the court had decided in previous cases that card-check elections are legitimate.
William L. Messenger, a lawyer for the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation representing Mulhall, received tougher questioning. Messenger said it should be clear that the casino had given the union a thing of value. "If the employer gives this assistance and the union gives something in return—for example, here the $100,000 political campaign and agreement not to strike—then it becomes a payment, because the consideration shows payment," he said.
But Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said the 11th Circuit’s decision was not that neutrality agreements necessarily violated the law. It wanted a lower court to discern whether the specific agreement was corrupt. Justice Elena Kagan led Messenger through a series of accommodations she said were accepted practice in labor negotiations that he would find objectionable in a neutrality agreement. Kagan asked, did he think "the National Labor Relations Act prohibits employers from providing access to their premises, from granting a union a list of employees, or from declaring itself neutral as to a union election"? When he answered, "Yes, with caveats," Justice Anthony M. Kennedy asked Messenger if he acknowledged that his answer "is contrary to years of settled practices and understandings."
Still, both liberal and conservative justices questioned the union’s pledge to spend $100,000 on the slot machine referendum. "That $ 100,000 is troubling to me because I think what the circuit was saying is if the $100,000 bought the peaceful recognition provisions, then that’s corrupt, and that is outside the exemptions that the law provides," said Justice Sonia Sotomayor. McCracken said the money was not given to Mardi Gras, but spent in an effort to make sure the company was successful and there would be more jobs. "It was actually the union’s own exercise of its speech and petition rights as it campaigned for the passage of the initiative that would allow the company to get into business in the first place as a casino," he said. [br] In " Messenger said it should be clear that the casino had given the union a thing of value", " a thing of value" is used as a_______.
选项
A、metaphor
B、contrast
C、metonymy
D、simile
答案
C
解析
修辞题。在第五段第二句中,控方律师麦辛格说,“赌场给予了工会有价值的东西,这一点应该很清楚。”在这句话中,麦辛格用了“有价值的东西”这一说法,是为了使其与《劳动管理关系法案》中的表述一致,使案情更加明朗化,而具体到他所打的官司中,“有价值的东西”实际上是指赌场允许工会接触其雇员,并赞成其进行非匿名投票。因此,“有价值的东西”在此是借代的用法,故选[C]。暗喻是使用某词来表示另一种物品,此处没有使用这样的修辞手法,故排除[A];对比需要将两种物品的差异进行比较,文中没有使用这样的用法,故排除[B];在使用明喻这一修辞法时,通常句中会出现as,like等信号词,该句中并没有这样的词语,故排除[D]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3851705.html
相关试题推荐
OnWednesday,theTreasuryDepartmentreleasedmoredetailsofitsplantos
OnWednesday,theTreasuryDepartmentreleasedmoredetailsofitsplantos
OnWednesday,theTreasuryDepartmentreleasedmoredetailsofitsplantos
OnWednesday,theTreasuryDepartmentreleasedmoredetailsofitsplantos
SupremeCourtjusticesseemedreluctantonWednesdaytodisallowatypeofa
SupremeCourtjusticesseemedreluctantonWednesdaytodisallowatypeofa
SupremeCourtjusticesseemedreluctantonWednesdaytodisallowatypeofa
随机试题
Variationsamongstateinsurancelawscancauseproblemsforfamilies.Ify
PartⅡReadingComprehension(SkimmingandScanning)Directions:Inthispart,y
框架结构的出现为建筑设计提供了许多有利条件,以下哪些是主要的?Ⅰ.大幅度地提高建
4~6个月小儿诊断为贫血,血红蛋白(Hb)应是A.<100g/L B.<110
刘先生,50岁,有吸烟史,咳嗽2个月,咯血或痰中带血2周。胸片示左肺上叶有1.5
根据《全国建筑市场各方主体不良行为记录认定标准》,属于工程质量不良行为的有(
患者,女性,2岁,颈部淋巴结肿大伴头晕、乏力、纳差2个月。两颌下、颈部、腋窝及腹
案例一: 一般资料:求助者,男性,35岁,已婚,硕士学历,公务员。 案例介绍
根据《企业无偿划转管理暂行办法》的规定,划入方(划出方)为国有独资企业的,对于决
2019年甲公司厂区实际占地面积300平方米,其中100平方米无偿给公安机关使用
最新回复
(
0
)