首页
登录
职称英语
The World Bank’s Real Problem The World Bank is undeniably
The World Bank’s Real Problem The World Bank is undeniably
游客
2024-11-04
4
管理
问题
The World Bank’s Real Problem
The World Bank is undeniably in crisis. But not because its president, Paul Wolfowitz, got his girlfriend a raise.
It is the Wolfowitz saga that has been grabbing all the headlines, of course. The Iraq-war architect was plucked from the Defense Department and deposited by President George W. Bush at the World Bank in 2005 (by tradition, the U.S. President picks the bank’s chief). At the time, Wolfowitz informed the bank’s ethics committee that he was seeing Shaha Riza, a communication adviser at the bank, and the in-house ethicists told him she should be moved to another agency and given a raise for her troubles. But the size of the pay hike (from $133,000 to $180,000, tax free) and other details about Riza’s transfer raised hackles among bank staff and sparked an investigation. The bank’s board will decide any day now whether Wolfowitz stays or goes.
This dragged-out mess, though, is a distraction. The bigger issue is that the Washington-based bank and its sister organization, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), are struggling to justify their continued existence.
The situation is most pressing for the smaller IMF, which pays its bills with the profits it makes by lending money to middle-income countries in financial trouble. With hardly any such countries in trouble these days, the organization is projecting a $224 million deficit for this fiscal year and asking its member nations if they can start selling off some of the gold they deposited with it after World War II (the answer so far: no).
The World Bank isn’t that desperate, but it faces similar pressure. Both organizations were created in 1944 by the soon-to-be-victorious Allied powers. At the time, says Harvard professor and former IMF chief economist Kenneth Rogoff, "global financial markets barely existed, and domestic financial markets barely existed in Europe."
The World Bank’s initial job was to finance reconstruction in Europe. The Marshall Plan rendered that task superfluous, so the bank—in the first of several reinventions— moved on to bankroll development in other countries. The idea was to lend to governments that were creditworthy but had no access to rich-country capital markets. "Now we live in a world where there are huge global capital markets, where, if anything, investors are too willing to invest in developing countries," says Adam Lerrick, a former investment banker who teaches economics at Carnegie Mellon University. The World Bank’s net lending has plummeted over the past few years, even as it keeps shopping loans to the likes of Brazil, Turkey, Russia and China, sometimes on hugely generous terms.
This is the work of the biggest part of the World Bank, the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Member countries make deposits (the U.S. share is $2 billion down and $30 billion pledged); the bank sells bonds backed by those deposits and pledges, then lends the money out at a small profit. The other main arm of the World Bank, the International Development Association, gets regular infusions of cash from rich countries and lends funds on near giveaway terms to truly poor countries, mostly in Africa (the U.S. contribution is just under $1 billion a year, or 0.04% of federal spending).
Lerrick wants the World Bank to stop lending to middle-income countries and restructure its loans to the poorest nations as outright grants. Nancy Birdsall, a former World Banker who run a Washington think tank called the Center for Global Development, argues that the bank could have more impact on poverty by making better use of its best assets: the expertise of its staff and its ability to coordinate global action. "Lending and grantmaking at the country level should not be the end-all and be-all," she says. "It should be the vehicle for advice and constant rebuilding of the bank’s knowledge." Birdsall is a World Bank fan but agrees with critics like Lerrick that it must become smaller (it has a staff of 10,000) and less bank like to remain relevant.
Wolfowitz’s allies say he is the victim of backlash from entrenched bank staff upset that he is turning up the heat on an anticorruption campaign begun by his predecessor, James Wolfensohn. That’s probably overstating things. But the potential backlash against slashing the bank’s staff and getting it out of lending would surely be epic. Which may explain why no World Bank president, Wolfowitz included, has attempted it. [br] According to the passage, the World Bank should do the following EXCEPT________.
选项
A、reducing staff
B、coordinating global action
C、increasing the profit it makes
D、offering advice to poor countries
答案
C
解析
由第八段可知,世行应给贫穷国家提供专业知识(D),协调全球的经济运作(B),以及缩减工作人员(A)。故C为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3831489.html
相关试题推荐
PASSAGETWO[br]Accordingtotheauthor,whatistheWorldBan’srealproblem?I
TheWorldBank’sRealProblem TheWorldBankisundeniably
TheWorldBank’sRealProblem TheWorldBankisundeniably
A、Totellmathpuns.B、Tosolvemathproblems.C、Toperformtonguetwisters.D、T
PassageTwo[br]Whatcanbethebesttitleofthispassage?TheProblemwith
PassaqeTwo(1)Oneoftheobviousproblemswithpredictingthefuture
PassaqeTwo(1)Oneoftheobviousproblemswithpredictingthefuture
PassaqeTwo(1)Oneoftheobviousproblemswithpredictingthefuture
PassageTwoComplaintsandlawsuitscannotsolvetheproblemofoverregu
PassageTwoComplaintsandlawsuitscannotsolvetheproblemofoverregu
随机试题
SixSecretsofHigh-EnergyPeopleA)There’sanenergycrisis
出版物发行单位外的出版物调剂,要直接开出外部转移单。()
某企业拟进行一项存在一定风险的完整工业项目投资,有甲、乙两个方案可供选择:已知甲
计划产量与实际产量差异最大的是哪种产品?()A.氢氧化铝 B.稀土
从新型制剂技术上分类,滴丸采用的是A:包合技术B:微型包囊技术C:固体分散技
某银行为争取客户资源开发了一种新的理财产品,但该理财产品存在的设计缺陷可能给银行
T细胞分化、发育、成熟的场所是A:脾脏 B:胸腺 C:骨髓 D:淋巴结
下列建设工程进度影响因素中,属于业主因素的有()。A.提供的场地不能满足工程正
尿路感染最常见途径是A、上行感染 B、血行感染 C、直接感染 D、淋巴道感
关于要约撤销的说法,正确的是()。A.撤销要约的通知应在要约到达受要约人之前到
最新回复
(
0
)