首页
登录
职称英语
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric
游客
2024-10-26
34
管理
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate—or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence "suggests a casual link" between extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields—those having very long wave-lengths—and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer, While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as "a possible, but not proven, cause of cancer in humans."
The report is no reason to panic—or even to lost sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the Bush Administration, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects, For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field, the electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilovolts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about I millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is for from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that (electromagnetic fields) present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report." Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane. [br] The view-point of the EPA is ______.
选项
A、there is casual link between electricity and cancer
B、electricity really affects cancer
C、controversial
D、low frequency electromagnetic field is a possible cause of cancer
答案
A
解析
细节理解题。答案在第二段第三句,环保署目前的结论是科学证据指出极低频电磁场——具有长波的电磁场——和白血病,淋巴瘤及脑癌之间有着难以确定的联系,从而说明电和致癌有一定的难以确定的关系。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3818773.html
相关试题推荐
Whatisthetalk’mainlyabout?[br][originaltext]Areelectriccarsthew
Whatisthetalk’mainlyabout?[originaltext]Areelectriccarsthewayof
Lungcancerhasnow______breastcancerasacauseofdeathforwomenintheU.
Everysocietyhasitsownpeculiarcustomsand______ofacting.A、waysB、behavio
Peopleinthatdistrict______useoillamps,forthereisnogasorelectricity
Canelectricitycausecancer?Inasocietythatliterallyrunsonelectric
Canelectricitycausecancer?Inasocietythatliterallyrunsonelectric
Histechniquehasdevelopedtothepoint______hecanrepairmanyoftheelectric
Thegrowingsizeofthepopulationis______majorconcernof______societynow
Theelectricfandoesnotworkbecauseofthe______ofservice.A、pauseB、break
随机试题
WearablegadgetslikesmartwatchesandGoogleGlasscanseemlikeafadtha
[originaltext]Hollywoodproducesmanydifferentkindsoffilms,includingm
集体土地所有权首次登记的申请人可以是( )。A.村集体经济组织 B.村民委员
A.桑寄生科B.三白草科C.蔷薇科D.唇形科E.豆科仙鹤草来源于
某小学少先队围绕“学雷锋”主题开展一系列少先队活动,体现了( )是少先队活动的
商业银行个人理财业务面临的主要风险有( )。A.法律风险 B.流动性风险
汇率政策中最基础、最核心的部分是()。A.促进国际收支平衡 B.确定
B正确答案是B。 提示:逐项排除。 选项A:是模拟信号,而x(t)和u(t)是原始信号,所以选项A错误。 选项B:正确。 选项C:这个是离散信号的定义,
关于吊顶工程施工工艺流程:①填充材料的安装;②吊杆安装;③安装收口压条;④龙骨安
对工程造价起着决定作用的是()。A.对特殊不良工程地质问题认识不足 B.施工
最新回复
(
0
)