首页
登录
职称英语
Global warming is already cutting substantially into potential crop yields i
Global warming is already cutting substantially into potential crop yields i
游客
2024-10-04
43
管理
问题
Global warming is already cutting substantially into potential crop yields in some countries—to such an extent that it may be a factor in the food price (1)______ that have caused worldwide stress in recent years, researchers suggest in a new study.
Wheat yields in recent years were down by more than 10 percent in Russia and by a few percentage points (2)______ in India, France and China compared with(3)______ they probably would have been without rising(4)______, according to the study.
Corn yields were(5)______ a few percentage points in China, Brazil and France from what would have been (6)______, said the researchers, whose findings were published in Friday’s (7)______ of the journal Science.
Some countries saw small gains from the temperature increases, however. And in all countries, the(8)______ carbon dioxide that humans are (9)______ into the air acted as a (10)______ that encouraged plant growth,(11)______ some of the losses from rising temperatures caused by that same greenhouse gas.
(12)______, the study’s authors found that when the gains in some countries were weighed(13)______ the losses in other countries, the overall global(14)______ of climate change has been small so far: losses of a few percentage points for wheat and corn from what they would have been (15)______ climate change. The general impact on production of rice and soybeans was(16)______, with gains in some regions entirely counterbalancing losses in others.
(17)______ the authors of the study pointed out that temperature increases were expected to(18)______ in coming decades, making it likely that the challenges(19)______ food production will grow in a era when demand is expected to(20)_____ sharply. [br] (16)
选项
A、arguable
B、noticeable
C、negligible
D、significant
答案
C
解析
句意关系题。根据空格后的提示,可知一些地区稻米和大豆的收成和其他地区的损失相互抵消。因此这种影响是很小的,选negligible“不重要的;很小的;不值得考虑的”。根据下文提示,可以首先排除noticeable“明显的”和significant“重大的”。既然下文已经明确指出收成和损失互相抵消,所以这种影响就是可以确定的。因此排除arguable“可争论的”。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3787116.html
相关试题推荐
Globalwarmingisalreadycuttingsubstantiallyintopotentialcropyieldsi
Globalwarmingisalreadycuttingsubstantiallyintopotentialcropyieldsi
Globalwarmingisalreadycuttingsubstantiallyintopotentialcropyieldsi
Globalwarmingisalreadycuttingsubstantiallyintopotentialcropyieldsi
Globalwarmingisalreadycuttingsubstantiallyintopotentialcropyieldsi
Globalwarmingisalreadycuttingsubstantiallyintopotentialcropyieldsi
Globalwarmingisalreadycuttingsubstantiallyintopotentialcropyieldsi
Globalwarmingisalreadycuttingsubstantiallyintopotentialcropyieldsi
Globalwarmingisalreadycuttingsubstantiallyintopotentialcropyieldsi
Globalwarmingisalreadycuttingsubstantiallyintopotentialcropyieldsi
随机试题
充分发挥个体、私营等非公有制经济在促进经济增长、扩大就业和活跃市场等方面的重要作用。放宽国内民间资本的市场准入领域,在投融资、税收、土地使用和对外贸易等
[originaltext]Asaresultofrisinguniversitycosts,manystudentsarefin
[originaltext]Mr.Fosterstartedhispublishingbusinesswithonlyonemaga
A.enhanceB.equivalentC.idealD.probablyE.muchF.shortageG.cer
样本方差是总体方差的无偏估计量。()
断面面积相等的圆管与方管,管长相等,沿程摩擦压力损失相等,摩擦阻力系数也相等,它
关于司法制度与法律职业的表述,下列哪一选项不能成立?()A.为了客观、中立、公
排列于腮腺浅叶前缘的解剖结构不包括A.面神经 B.耳大神经 C.腮腺导管
关于氧化镁电缆特性的说法,错误的是( )。 A.氧化镁绝缘材料是无机物 B
属于器官非特异性自身免疫性疾病的是A、重症肌无力 B、类风湿性关节炎 C、Ⅰ
最新回复
(
0
)