首页
登录
职称英语
In recent years criticisms have been voiced concerning sexist bias in the En
In recent years criticisms have been voiced concerning sexist bias in the En
游客
2024-09-15
20
管理
问题
In recent years criticisms have been voiced concerning sexist bias in the English language. It has been argued that some of the vocabulary and grammar we use reflects and reinforces a traditional view of the world as one in which men are dominant and women play a secondary role.
Take the word "chairman" , for example. While this can in fact apply to people of both sexes, it appears to some people to be male-oriented as it ends in "man". In the past people taking the role of chairman were exclusively male, and the word was obviously originally a compound of "chair" and "man". Many English speakers, however, have ceased to view this word as a compound and no more feel it to be composed of two units, "chair" and "man", than they perceive "cupboard" as composed of "cup" and "board". In addition the continued use of chairman might be defended on the grounds that the final syllable is pronounced /m’n/ rather than / maen/, just like the final syllable of woman. Despite such considerations other speakers take a contrary view and are sensitive to the components of which it is made up. They clearly perceive it as a title which perpetuates traditional ideas about the place of women in society. For this reason they seek to replace it with neutral terms such as "chairperson" or "chair" , so that it is now possible to ask questions such as: "Who is chair of the committee?"
Other changes advocated include the replacement of words such as "postman", "fireman" and " policeman" with more clearly neutral terms such as "postal worker", "fire-fighter" and "police officer". There is, however, continuing controversy about how far such language changes should go. Should changes also be considered to traditional idioms such as "man in the street" and titles such as "Peking Man"? What about those words where the male meaning of "man" is no longer dominant, such as "manhandle"?
To the extent that changes have taken place, they have done so more in the written language and formal pronouncements than in everyday speech. You would be quite likely to read in the paper that "Postal workers are to receive a pay increase". But "Has the postman been?" would be most likely to be heard in informal conversation. Here "postman" remains firmly entrenched in popular usage.
The lack of a sex-neutral third-person singular in English has also attracted attention. How, for example, do we fill in the blank in the following sentence? "A good teacher always makes sure -is well prepared for the lesson." Traditionally, this would be filled in with "he". The male pronoun in such cases is clearly intended to refer to both sexes. It is still widely used in this way, but some people, especially women, dislike it. They may prefer to add the female pronoun to the male, as in "A good teacher always makes sure he or she is well prepared for the lesson". Some people, however, feel that this looks and sounds awkward. Another solution is to use the plural "they" for the singular; "A good teacher always makes sure they are well prepared for the lesson. " This is often heard in conversation, but is less frequent in formal written English. More cautious souls can avoid the problem altogether by rephrasing in the plural: "Good teachers always make sure they are well prepared for the lesson."
The extent to which language reflects and shapes attitudes and behaviors is a matter of conjecture. Chinese, Japanese, Persian and Turkish do not make the kinds of sex distinctions English makes through its system of pronouns, but it would be difficult to maintain that males who speak these languages are less sexist than males who speak English! [br] All of the following statements are CORRECT EXCEPT that______.
选项
A、Japanese does not make the kinds of sex distinctions English makes through its system of pronouns
B、Japanese are less sexist than males who speak English
C、traditionally we say "A good teacher always makes sure he is well prepared for the lesson. "
D、in order to avoid the problem we can use plural form to replace the singular
答案
B
解析
推理题. 文章最后一句…but it would be difficult to maintain that males who speak these languages are less sexist than males who speak English!明确指出,日语等代词体系中不存在性别歧视的国家并不能保证该国不存在其他形式的性别歧视,所以[B]是正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3759087.html
相关试题推荐
Thenewsitemismainlyabout______.[br][originaltext](21)Recentdiscover
Thenewsitemismainlyabout______.[originaltext](21)Recentdiscoveriesof
HowlongdoesittakefortherunnerstocrossthestartinglineinrecentMarat
HowlongdoesittakefortherunnerstocrossthestartinglineinrecentMarat
Whathasrecentresearchfoundaboutdrinking?[br][originaltext]Researche
Inrecentyears,bothAmericansandChinesehavegainedsightoftheoriginalvi
Recently,aprestigiousuniversityassigneduniversitydormitorybasedonse
[originaltext]M:Goodmorning,Faith.Inlightoftherecenteconomicdownturn,
[originaltext]M:Goodmorning,Faith.Inlightoftherecenteconomicdownturn,
SusanGreenfield’srecentcommentsabouthowmoderntechnologyandsocialme
随机试题
Inthissectiontherearefourreadingpassagesfollowedbyatotaloftwenty
StaggeringtasksconfrontedthepeopleoftheUnitedStates,NorthandSout
某四层办公楼中无隔热防火措施的排烟管道与可燃物之间的最小距离限值应为下列哪一项?
有机磷农药的主要急性毒性是( )。A.抑制胆碱脂酶的活性 B.血液系统障碍
华弗氏综合征发生于A.中毒性痢疾 B.流行性脑脊髓膜炎 C.流行性乙型
某工程承包合同总额为9000万元,主要材料及构件所占比重为60%,工程预付款为合
敌百虫中毒时,洗胃禁忌使用A.生理盐水 B.油性泻药 C.硫酸钠 D.碳酸
李女士,GIPO,妊娠28周,半夜睡醒发现自己卧在血泊之中,入院呈休克状态,最可
发行人首次公开发行股票,主承销商应在()中说明内核情况。A:发行保荐书 B:
根据马科维茨的金融证券投资理论,证券投资需要满足“有效边界”理论。证券投资的“有
最新回复
(
0
)